BohemianRhandomly
Registered User
What the Chief brought was an "Us versus Them" mentality that I sorely miss. He wasn't an observational analyst like Engblom, you could feel what was happening out on the ice by both what he said, and how he subcommunicated it. I learned to hate or love certain players through him, or feel the momentum/what was happening in the game by how he acted. I remember coming home, turning on the television, and knowing something was amiss the night Stamkos broke his leg, simply by hearing the tonality of his voice.
I'm not the type of guy who wants to just see a play happen and acknowledge it, I want to experience it through the eyes of the play by play guy and color analyst. It's that type of empathy that Engblom lacks. You don't have to be a blind homer, but I want to experience a full range of emotions during a game from the point of view of my team. Also, I don't want to see Engblom go, he brings a lot of insight and is good, but he needs to add this element.
Well said. That's the thing: Engblom can analyze with the best of them, but he lacks a crucial human element that a lot of people now miss. I think what I'd like to see from him is not necessarily homerism, but at least a sense that he's invested in the Lightning and their success, and I have yet to feel that from him. He's so carefully neutral that it comes across as somewhat unnatural, given that so many of us - as passionate fans - tend to feel emotional involvement during the games. There's a disconnect there.
In previous seasons, I always disliked when our games were broadcast on national networks rather than Sunsports precisely because the extreme neutrality was boring to me. It was always a welcome relief to me when the next game was aired, and we had our own local commentators back, who actually cared if we won or how our players fared. This year, with Engblom's influence, it's almost as if every game is on national television. Just doesn't feel the same.