Their iss rankings are complete wrong. Or not the neweset one...
Yep. Those must be their second last rankings (they are the same apparently forgotten below the weights in their guide)
they start to be different from #26 on..
Bob M. said: "There has NEVER been a year like this, where players ranked as low as 50 by some teams are getting serious first round consideration from others".
I think Bob is vastly underestimating the situation here. Although there may be more variation this year, it is extremely common for players that one team has rated about #50 to go to another team in the first round.
That caught my attention as well.
I have an hard time believing Bob is not aware of what you rightly excepted, so i thought more of an understatement by his part..
like
"There has NEVER been a year like this, where players ranked as low as 50 by some teams are
getting serious first round consideration from others"
translates into something like
" There has NEVER been a year like this, where players ranked as low as 50 by some teams are
getting serious top 15 consideration from others"
that sounds more like what he actually had in his mind or what he was implying..
For those of you saying stuff like "Bobby Mac is out to lunch on this one (Sutter)...", Bob's top prospects on TSN are usually the best prognostication of what actually transpires on draft day.
yeah, here comes something i'm never too sure about while reading TSN draft rankings:
-how much is this just a consensus list?
-how much is it a prediction? (the mock draft should be for it, but maybe this is more of Bob prediction out of some scouts' consensus while the mock is more of TSN's as a whole?)
- bottom line, how much, if any, Bob's own opinion and judgement is involved in this ranking?