You really think that is the explanation for Eberle's playoff "performance"? Really? Did you not watch the games?
I see no reason to not point it out. It's true.
He had 16 goals and 47 points against actual real NHL competition followed up by 2 points in 13 playoff games.
Even with these moves next summer as in 12 months from now (NOT 2 years from now), we are likely capped out or close to it.
At the lower end of expectations, with McDavid at 10 and Draisaitl at 7.5, I have the Oilers at 74 million in salary minimum for 18-19 and that assumes Maroon walks for nothing and Caggiula at a cheap 2 mill per is his replacement effectively. Also assumes we somehow clear Pouliot's salary without taking any back.
It's true that he scored 4 points in 2 games against the canucks, yes. But he also did that against other teams. Should we scrape through the reasons why he was lucky enough to score 2 points against other teams? Were they playing their backup? Take those out of his total. Secondary assists? Probably just had the puck hit his leg - take those off. This is a stupid, arbitrary argument that you're using that you can't possibly stand behind because if you take his points away for that, you have to take all points every player got against them. Therefore you reduce the overall points in the league and his 47 points are prorated to be just as good as his 51 overall. You just can't take only his points away and compare him to the rest of the league that way.
The reaction to an Eberle trade is forecasting to be worse than Hall's.
If he ends up staying I don't want to see any of his supporters complaining on here when he's coasting by November 1st.
Both aging and more than likely regressing and declining. I'd prefer the young player who outscored all but 20 RWs while getting 2nd line, no top PP time, and not playing with a offensively gifted center. We can get rid of cap in other ways, or just get rid of him next year. Why make our team worse now when you don't have to? That's the mindboggling part, because we WILL NOT be stuck with Eberle next year. Even if GMs play hardball next year, who gives a **** if all you want is cap space to sign those aging vets?
Strome now vs picks/prospects next year. What's the difference? Hell, those picks and prospects could turn out better than Strome anyways.
It was the last 2 games where the Canucks were dressing their 3rd string goalie, a bunch of AHL guys, and their veterans might as well have been on the golf course already. Those two games were laughers with basically nothing at stake but McDavid hitting 100.
20% of his entire regular season + playoff goal scoring came in those two useless games, I don't think it's wrong to point it out.
I don't get this crusade against Eberle at all. Makes zero sense to move him for "cap space" at this point.
We can trade Ebs for picks and prospects. Then sign Eaves and Williams. Both players compliments Drai and McDavid and can play up and down the lineup. Exactly the opposite of Ebs.