DrunkUncleDenis
Condra Fan
- Mar 27, 2012
- 11,820
- 1,682
Are you including Mac's contract that Melnyk will not be paying?They're spending at least $10-12M by mid august on Stone and Ceci.. After signing the RFA's it would put us 10-12th in the league in salaries next season perhaps a bit lower.
Our current salary for next year is about 60M. 10th in salary cap next year is currently Chicago with about 73M and a 77M projected salary. I don't see us getting into that kind of range.They're spending at least $10-12M by mid august on Stone and Ceci.. After signing the RFA's it would put us 10-12th in the league in salaries next season perhaps a bit lower.
I stated that the priority should be to sign the #1C and D.Aren't you the poster who suggested trading Stone to free up cash to sign Duchene and Karlsson? And then suggested that Stone was just a top six player, implying that he isn't an elite or significant player?
I stated that the priority should be to sign the #1C and D.
Stone is a top line winger, but has less value than EK by a large margin.
I want all three signed.
If they can only afford two, then I want Karlsson and Duchene, as they play the more important position.
I voiced zero concern with those who do not share my opinion.
Karlsson is the ONLY player we should never consider trading.Okay, I don't know the full extent of what was previously posted or your disagreements so I speculated based on what I knew.
To your first point my response is that it isn't as simple as that. It is a good rule of thumb but in certain contexts it isn't the best strategy. EK is certainly an elite number 1 d man so him being a priority. But when it comes to Duchene vs Stone it isn't as clear. Stone is already a 1A winger and he has the upside to be one of the best wingers in the league. Duchene can play number 1 C but at this point he is more of a 1B or 2A centre. He has some high upside but it isn't so sure whether he will achieve it. In some ways it is kind of like comparing Ovechkin to Backstrom. They are both very valuable players but arguably Ovechkin is more important.
As for your second point you haven't factored in variables such as RFA rights and interest/willingness to play for the Senators. Karlsson may be the more valuable player but if he doesn't want to play here then it is a waste to trade Stone to try to keep him. Also if I was Karlsson I would be even less inclined to sign with the Sens if they traded Stone, it would just suggest the team is moving in the wrong direction.
I am also surprised that you even considered moving Stone. Stone is one of the only players we shouldn't be trading. If salary or cap space was the issue we have a bunch of contracts we could get rid of. It just doesn't make sense to move Stone in any scenario.
It just sounds like you really underrate Mark Stone as a player. One interesting thing worth noting is he has barely played with any other 1st line player in his NHL career and has still put up strong offensive numbers. He barely played with Spezza when Spezza played with the Sens. Turris is a 2A centre and MacArthur is a 2nd/3rd line winger and he helped them both put up strong nunbers. Brassard is arguably a 3A centre or maybe a 2B centre. Pageau and Smith are 3rd liners at best and he made them both look like top six players. The only legitimate 1st liner he has played with is Duchene and he barely plays with him at all. Stone has proven he is an elite player and he even produced at slightly over a point per game this year when the team sucked.
Give Stone some stars or elite players to play with and watch him dominate.
I had us at $61,813,333 as of today on cap friendly. Then just added 12M to that for $73,813,333. Would put us at 13th in the league. So yeah 12M for them is around the max, or lower than that...we could be middle of the pack in cap and that's pretty good too.Our current salary for next year is about 60M. 10th in salary cap next year is currently Chicago with about 73M and a 77M projected salary. I don't see us getting into that kind of range.
Your 10-12M for Stone and Ceci is probably pretty close. I highly doubt we'll be spending over 70M so cuts are gonna be made somewhere.
I don't really know anything about their contract details like that but am assuming they're taken care of.Are you including Mac's contract that Melnyk will not be paying?
Are you including Gaborik's contract that Melnyk will likely not be paying?
Salary cap hit and actual salary outlay are quite different for the Sens.
Ottawa is cheap and pathetic, they’ve spent the least in the league this off season ($5.35M) where the top teams spent over $100M.
www.puckpedia.com/salary-cap/signings-team
This is a terrible metric.
No it doesn't. It shows that we cleared salary to re-sign our RFA's. Or doesn't include that yet more or less.It shows that the owner refuses to spend any money. It’s no coincidence they’ve spent the least this off season
Ottawa is cheap and pathetic, they’ve spent the least in the league this off season ($5.35M) where the top teams spent over $100M.
www.puckpedia.com/salary-cap/signings-team
Wasn’t there just a release renovations weee being done to the arena. Could be wrongIt shows that the owner refuses to spend any money. It’s no coincidence they’ve spent the least this off season
Ottawa is cheap and pathetic, they’ve spent the least in the league this off season ($5.35M) where the top teams spent over $100M.
www.puckpedia.com/salary-cap/signings-team
No it doesn't. It shows that we cleared salary to re-sign our RFA's. Or doesn't include that yet more or less.
This doesn't seem to be a correct interpretation. If that were the case both Stone and Ceci would have their extensions signed.
Both are correct. Our owner is cheap and we are trying to clear money to sign our RFAs under the current strict budget. Hooray unity!No it doesn't. It shows that we cleared salary to re-sign our RFA's. Or doesn't include that yet more or less.
This doesn't seem to be a correct interpretation. If that were the case both Stone and Ceci would have their extensions signed.
There is little chance of that being correct unfortunately. These are the typical silent days of summer.With the lack of activity by the Senators management group this offseason it seems highly probable that Melnyk is in active negotiations to sell the team. It is pure speculation but at the same time it also seems like the only logical way to explain what is going on currently. The alternative just doesn't make any sense to me. If Melnyk spends to the cap floor then attendance will be very low right from the start of the season because there will be no real reason to go to the games. Both Karlsson and Duchene are UFA's at the end of the year and if the Senators can't coordinate a deal with Stone and have to rely on the arbitrator's decision then he will be a UFA at the end of the year as well. If Melnyk continues to own the team and spends to the cap floor then it seems highly likely that all three of Stone, Duchene and Karlsson would walk in free agency. The Senators GM Pierre Dorion has already proven his questionable ability to make competent trades which in turn will make the fans nervous as whatever return he could get. Losing all three would be absolutely devastating and would just anger and upset the fans which would in turn lead them to quit spending money on the team.
Melnyk and Dorion took the time to have those town hall meetings and it opens up the questions of what the point of that was given what they have done since. Even the season ticket packages prices have gone up which seems impossible to justify. There has also been speculation that the season ticket package purchases are way down. The Senators have spent the least of all NHL teams this offseason and basically sat out of free agency. Melnyk seems pretty cheap but it comes across as unlikely that he would risk giving up tens of millions of dollars to give an F U to Ottawa and the fans. He must know that attendance will only drop if they don't ice a higher quality roster. Also even with the risk of losing Stone, Karlsson and Duchene will make both Dorion and Melnyk universally hated in Ottawa and they will find it terrible to live here because the fans will basically chase them out of town.
It just seems much more likely that Melynk is holding back giving out contracts to sell the team. Why would he even want to own the team anymore? He is hated in Ottawa, he is losing money and he will lose more money if he spends less and if he trades Karlsson and loses Stone he won't be able to set foot in the city without being berated by angry fans. Why not cut his losses and just sell the team?
It just makes more sense that the team is in the process of being sold than the alternative of Melnyk burning his own money.