Rumor: Trade Rumors/Proposals/Free Agents 2017-2018 ‎part deux the sequel

[Micklebot]

recent topics of interest,

- Trade for Giroux
- Re-sign Stalberg
- What number would Jagr wear if we signed him
- do these pants make me look fat?
- what my horoscope said and why I hate you now.

Click to read more...

 

[HSF]

doesnt make sense to move ceci now that Meth is gone

he is a lock to stay on the roster imo

 

[YouGotAStuGoing]

Could be worse on the pants issue, Micklemachine. You could be rocking Cooperalls.

 

[BUCKLE UP]

Jagr takes 66 for the lols

 

[Sun God Nika]

I'll really be disappointed if stalberg isn't signed

 

[Big Papi]

I'll really be disappointed if stalberg isn't signed

Dude you always seem disappointed with anything the sens do lol

 

[trentmccleary]

doesnt make sense to move ceci now that Meth is gone

he is a lock to stay on the roster imo

Methot gone.
Ceci 2nd in mins played on the team.
Karlsson UFA eligibility in 2 years.
Phaneuf is older.

Look at what Montreal has done in a year. Subban, Emelin, Beaulieu, Sergachev and possibly Markov gone. It looks very old all of a sudden and not as deep, unless they re-sign Markov (who makes them even older). If they have a d-man under 30 playing for them this season, it'll probably be 1 guy on the bottom pair. What will their d-corps look like in 3 years?

Things could change pretty quick and having the stability of a Ceci through this time is very important.

 

[trentmccleary]

I'll really be disappointed if stalberg isn't signed

I liked Stalberg, but why?
Will he play over;
- young emerging Dzingel?
- highly paid Burrows?
- Teacher's pet Pyatt?
- top prospect White?

...and there's only 3 starting jobs for those players.

 

[Langdon Alger]

It makes little sense to sign Stalberg unless we move a forward in a trade. Right now, we have 12 forwards on one way deals (including Pageau and Dzingel).

Is it possible Dzingel gets traded if he asks for too much money? If he does, it would make sense to bring back Stalberg.

 

[Tundraman]

On Friday, didn't Dorion say they'd know about Stalberg that day or Saturday? He then said: (paraphrasing...) "ok maybe for you guys going to the cottage I'll say Monday at the latest". They announce the signings but not the non-signings so can we say no official statement means no signing? Yes? Is it end of story?

 

[YouGotAStuGoing]

On Friday, didn't Dorion say they'd know about Stalberg that day or Saturday? He then said: (paraphrasing...) "ok maybe for you guys going to the cottage I'll say Monday at the latest". They announce the signings but not the non-signings so can we say no official statement means no signing? Yes? Is it end of story?

Day's not over... but I'd be inclined to agree that it's probably not looking good.

 

[UnHappyDude]

We totally don't need StahlBergo. we have a full roster without considering the call ups eg. white

 

[Micklebot]

We totally don't need StahlBergo. we have a full roster without considering the call ups eg. white

Agreed.

Not doing this by expected lines, but:

Hoffman-Turris-Ryan
MacArthur-Brassard-Stone
Smith-Pageau-Burrows
Dzingel-Thompson-Pyatt

I don't see us signing Stalberg to be our 13th forward, or push one above to be our 13th forward. Then we have Paul, White, Didomenico and McCormick. No need to re-sign him even though I wanted to, Thompson replaced him.

 

[HSF]

I wouldn't mind bringing him back just cause I think his speed can be used on some nights. Boucher likes to have options and depth depending on who we play and White is an unknown he could start in AHL after Brass comes back.


Fairly indifferent though. Would be happy to have him back but isn't a big loss if he isnt

 

[Langdon Alger]

We totally don't need StahlBergo. we have a full roster without considering the call ups eg. white

StahlBergo

 

[Lenny the Lynx]

I feel like it wouldnt be much fun to play blackjack with dorion because he'd get to like 12 and decide to stand and see what happens

 

[danielpalfredsson]

The writing with Stalberg is on the wall.

Once Dzingel/Pageau are dealt with and Turris is extended, we'll have at least 12 forwards on 1 way deals this season and 13 next season when McCormick's 1 way kicks in.

Now a trade is possible, but 13 forwards on 1 way deals is a log jam. I would guess we prioritized getting a C, and with Pyatt willing to sign for relatively cheap, Pyatt and Thompson pushed Stalberg and Wingels out.

If there is a deal on the table for Stalberg, my guess is it is something to the effect of "look this is what we can do, if you want it, let us know". It's probably a low ball 1 year 750k type deal. We're at 65M in salary right now with Dzingel, Pageau, and a 23rd forward having to be paid, o I can't see us dropping 1.5M on Stalberg at this point when we already have 12 forwards on 1 way deals. I especially can't see us giving another bottom 6 player 2 years unless there's a big trade we are ready to pull the trigger on that'll move some bodies out.

 

[IranCondraAffair]

Only way I see Ottawa re-signing Stalberg is if we somehow package Dzingel + Defenseman for a proven top-4 guy.

 

[MaxTheLimit]

Was this ever confirmed?



EDIT: It seems fake. Can't find any corroboration from other sources. Just some dude.

 

[YouGotAStuGoing]

Was this ever confirmed?

Looks like a fan account. Not reliable at all.

 

[danielpalfredsson]

Was this ever confirmed?

Unless there is a mix up and it is a 3 year 2.7M contract with a 900k AAV rather than a 3 year 2.7M AAV contract....there's no way that's legit. If it is legit....

 

[Super Cake]

Was this ever confirmed?



EDIT: It seems fake. Can't find any corroboration from other sources. Just some dude.

Fake

 

[Super Cake]

Looks like a fan account. Not reliable at all.

Is he a fan though.

His summary when you click on his account pretty much says he is a partisan to the death of the Ottawa Senators.

Seems more like a troll than anything else.

 

[TheNewEra]

Stalberg as our 12/13th forward would be great but considering Thompson took a spot I don't want him as badly

 

[edguy]

Stalberg as our 12/13th forward would be great but considering Thompson took a spot I don't want him as badly

Thompson shouldnt effect Stalberg at all.. Thompson is Kellys replacement not Stalbergs.

The decision here is Dzingel v Stalberg.. The coach clearly preffered Stalberg for the last half of last year (and playoffs). And I would argue he is a better player for our bottom 6.