Here's the thing....Eriksson is owed 18 million dollars over the next 3 seasons. How much talent do you think Vancouver will give away to rid themselves of that contract?
Now look at our situation. We are deep in high end D prospects. We are deep inG prospects. We are very deep in F prospects.what we are missing is really high end F prospects.
Do you think you can extract enough really high end F talent from Vancouver for this to make any sense? For us to spit out 18 million dollars when we are already going to struggle to pay Chabot, Tkachuk etc?
This deal will never happen but not for the reason you are alluding to.
So I live in Vancouver and the media here has dragged this story on and on and on about an Eriksson deal even before those comments he made to a Swedish news outlet. Couple things they keep repeating:
1) Vancouver is in a place now where they put together a depth chart of forwards and not have Loui factor into the top 12. That hasn't happened since they signed him. They also have enough capable forwards that can fill in where Loui was (PK, checking line, more goals etc.)
2) It's hard for anyone to imagine him showing up to the Canucks training camp this year given how the last 6 months have transpired. Travis Green has alluded in interviews that he would rather give someone else Eriksson ice time for a number of reasons. If that scenario does happen, there is a real possibility that they bury him in Utica until they find something that works.
3) Jake Virtanen's name has constantly been brought up as the sweetener to any Eriksson deal now that the Lucic swap won't be happening.
From a Sens POV I don't think this makes any sense. Taking on Eriksson may get them Virtanen as well but it looks like Benning doesn't want to do that, at least for another year.
Best case scenario would be getting a young project as the add on but there are better deals out there if all you want back is another teams project.