Ok, but which strategy do you think has a higher probability of yielding a championship?
Adding Dobson, Newhook, Byram, + gives us areally solid prospect pool. Then tanking over the next couple years should give us an elite talent. An elite talent plus a really solid all around prospect pool is a good combination imo.
I have super strong reservations about tanking. We "tanked" twice in the past 8 years - whether it's actual tanking or just luck at lotto - point is we had 3rd pick twice. Galch was a major disappointment - Kotka looks ok and should have potential I hope - but i don't know that he'll necessarily be some big impact player. More like a decent second line guy maybe. That's picking 3rd.
What does tanking guarantee? What does tanking even mean? Are both Anaheim and LA tanking these past two years? I would think most people would say yes.
LA had a
horrible season last year - finished 2nd to last. All they got was the 5th overall pick for it. This year they're also 2nd to last - but could theoretically still pass a couple of teams by end. They may get another 4th-8th pick with bad luck.
Anaheim is 5th from last this year, last year they finished 8th from last. Looking at last year's record - they won their last 3 games (6 points). Remove those 6 points, and they're passed by 4 teams. Anaheim ended up with the 9th pick last year. Good chance they end up picking in that range again this year - maybe ~6-10 or so.
Now picking 5th overall - or even top 10 - that's certainly not bad. But that might get you a Sergachev, or Drouin, or Galchenyuk, or Kotka. In fact - it almost certainly will. It's possible you might absolutely luck out and get a Matthews, McDavid, Dahlin, Eichel level talent instead - but odds are against you.
Based on this description of odds and likelihood of actually getting an absolute top draft pick - i'd rather take my chances on keeping Price/Weber and go for the retool. Vs getting rid of both Price/Weber (two still excellent players who can help us win) and risk ending up with a bunch of Galchenyuks and Kotka's but no Price nor Weber 3 years from now - and in a much worst off position to compete for a cup. Maybe we do luck out with this approach and end up with a Dahlin/Matthews level talent - but odds are very much against it.
I'm not super familiar with Dobson, Newhook and Byram. I'm fine trading guys like Tatar, Petry, Kovalchuk, etc. You suggested those 3 for Newhook and Bryam - assuming that's good value for us, sure. It's just going the extra distance of also trading Weber and especially Price that I disagree with, especially if it's just to "tank and try to get lucky at draft". If we trade Weber/Price for super good returns - that might be more tempting, but i doubt they're even worth as much as we'd like.