How about the Oilers #1 and #2 d-men?
Klefbom(25) + Larsson(26)
for
Seth Jones
How about our #1 and #2 center for McDavid?
Dubois (20) + Wennberg (24)
For
Mcdavid
That's not a comparable bud.
How about the Oilers #1 and #2 d-men?
Klefbom(25) + Larsson(26)
for
Seth Jones
If you can get Hall back for Larsson, then how about Kelfbom, Hall, and Draisaitl for Jones?
Any thoughts on picking up Charlie Coyle from The Wild?
Draisaitl for Jones would be equal value.
How about the Oilers #1 and #2 d-men?
Klefbom(25) + Larsson(26)
for
Seth Jones
Not happening.Draisaitl for Jones would be equal value.
Keep telling yourself that. Like Johansen for Jones is or was equal value.
Look at where the 2 teams stand. Why is your defense SO BAD with Klefbom and Larsson and ours is so good with Jones?
The NHL isn't points only fantasy hockey.
How bout this then, dude....
Draisitl for Larsson and Klefbom
Our record before and after Klefbom got injured was pretty significant and we were trending to be a playoff team.
Sure it is. Dubois and Wennberg would actually be helpful to Edmonton 'cause y'all lack scoring, while we're stacked on the blueline - particularly at LD - and so wouldn't be able to make much use of those guys. That more than offsets any difference between McDavid and Jones.That's not a comparable bud.
Draisaitl for Jones would be equal value.
Sabres fan here. Noting the post on page one from @visqi it’s clear the Sabres and CBJ aren’t ideal trade partners. Both teams are looking for a Center.
Assuming CBJ makes a move for a Center and still has Wennberg around, what could work from the Sabres for Wennberg?
2nd rounder plus ?
Thanks in advance!
The proposal is assuming a context in which we've already gotten another center by trading other assets.We would need an upgrade at center if we’re trading Wennberg. A 2nd round pick doesn’t accomplish that.
Have said it before, but will say again - I like the idea of having him on this team, but I suspect he would be costly to acquire (because we're in-division and the Rangers really like him) and costly to retain (because he's already paid a lot and would be looking for a raise). Worth looking into, but be prepared for potential disappointment.Kevin Hayes would buy us some time as a rental and would be an upgrade to Wenny
Moe, I never said that the non-Wennberg line up I posted was a Cup contender. I was merely illustrating that we can get by without Wennberg. Thus, Wennberg is tradeable independent of whether we acquire Duchene or someone like him. Frankly, our current lineup, even with Bread, is not, imho, a Cup contender because we do not have a viable second scoring line.