sawchuk1971
Registered User
- Jun 16, 2011
- 1,493
- 508
Another example of why a lot of vets don't like playing for him.
Would you do me a favor and list these players? Is this number higher or lower than other coaches in the league. Generally speaking, if you are a veteran, you aren't getting the type of critiques that Duclair received. Why? Well because you've actually hung around long enough to become a veteran. You kind of had to be doing something right.
I'll be honest. this felt like a last ditch effort to get Duclair's attention. I'm not sure Torts is that calculating, I tend to think he's just frustrated. Having said that, I'm not sure there was anything all the outrageous in what he said, it's just that he said them in public. I've certainly heard for more objectionable rants.
I'm not sure I'm ready to move on with Duclair, we'll see if the franchise is. Savard does not have a great deal of hockey sense (not much really), but with all the hard work the coaching staff has done they've turned him into a somewhat competent instinctual player. Basically they've substituted hockey sense with a great deal of repetition. I haven't really watched as much hockey this season as I've had, but what I've seen of Duclair he doesn't look hopeless. He certainly has more tools than Savard has.
As far as the future of Torts, he's our second best coach we've had. I wonder what GG could have done if we had given him more of a chance. Having said that, I'm not a fan of how he manages players during the game and he does it out coached on regular basis. Having said that most of the know coaches that would be better have been scooped up by other teams. With us being at the beginning of our window, this actually might be a decent time to take a chance on a more of an unknown - you can always find a pretty good veteran coach if things don't work out.
Dubi admitted so when he was hired here. J Johnson on his way to Pittsburg. Panarin in one of his interviews said they were trying to work on their relationship. Those were 3 during his time here where vets admitted they didn't like him (Dubi was referring to his time previous).
That's because people don't have the ability or desire to comprehend the nuance in "good guy" versus "plays the right way on the ice". If you don't play the right way, it must be because you hate your teammates, and certainly not because of ingrained reflexive bad habits.The other main problem I have with the comments is, truth and/or effectiveness aside, people are now thinking of Duclair as a locker room cancer or real troublemaker. That’s not fair to him.
Either Svoboda or Hedger asked multiple CBJ players about him a couple days ago. “Awesome teammate” was the response. If a player didn’t want to rock the boat, he could have said, “good teammate” or something like that. Using the word “awesome” implies he, truly, is a really good teammate. But now you have people all over the place disparaging Duclair’s character. (And, in particular with the obvious elephant in the room involving Duclair, that’s really unfair.)
That's because people don't have the ability or desire to comprehend the nuance in "good guy" versus "plays the right way on the ice". If you don't play the right way, it must be because you hate your teammates, and certainly not because of ingrained reflexive bad habits.
I think he does realize that, and that it's why he doesn't resort to this soft of thing all that often. Duclair's obviously been trying, but... well, as I've noted more than a few times, he's just got this "fish out of water" look to him any time he's in the defensive zone. He's hearing what's being said but it's not getting internalized. So at this point, maybe something radical is needed. I got a "I'm trying and he's trying but something isn't working" vibe from Torts in that video, so...I’m not saying those are Torts’s thoughts (in fact, I think quite the opposite). What I am saying is he should realize others will interpret it that way. As a coach, I think he needs to recognize that and be more wary of protecting his player from unnecessary scrutiny (both simply because it’s the right thing to do AND because I imagine it’s now a distraction for Duclair how people are talking about him).
Dubi admitted so when he was hired here. J Johnson on his way to Pittsburg. Panarin in one of his interviews said they were trying to work on their relationship. Those were 3 during his time here where vets admitted they didn't like him (Dubi was referring to his time previous).
Dubi admitted so when he was hired here. J Johnson on his way to Pittsburg. Panarin in one of his interviews said they were trying to work on their relationship. Those were 3 during his time here where vets admitted they didn't like him (Dubi was referring to his time previous).
Listen he's one of those guys that current players don't like. After time (reflection) a lot of guys understand what he was doing and appreciate him. But he's rough, blunt and accountable (some of those are good traits, others are very old school).
And being the 2nd best coach in history of one of the 10 worst franchises in North America isn't something to brag about (especially since only been in existence for 20 years). Like being the tallest midget.
Much like Hitch he had some success here and success in past with other teams.
Finally I disagree with "beginning of our window". Window may be closing losing 2 of 3 most decorated players. Guess we'll see next season what the core actually is, but I don't think many observors outside of area code 614 will see us as more than a #3 or Wild Card team next year even if we add Ducehene or Stone.