Value of: Toronto - Calgary (Nylander + Hamilton)

Brock Radunske

안양종합운동장 빙상장
Aug 8, 2012
16,787
4,701
This is the problem discussing value with some Leaf fans. Their 60 point player for some reason has 80 point value. Not that there isn’t potential left in Nylander but the same can be said for the defenseman who is only 2 years older.
This is the problem with discussing the value of Leafs fans with people who have an agenda.
They assume that a player who has been in the league for two seasons won't improve to fit their flawed narrative
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Man with a Plan

CraigsList

In Conroy We Trust
Apr 22, 2014
19,201
6,980
USA
Here we go again with the overrating of Nylander.

And no, Hamilton isn’t on the block. Not sure how many times it’ll take to get into everyone’s heads that we’re just listening and will only, ONLY trade him if we’re getting overpayment.

Additionally, Hamilton has been getting better and better every year, with 3 years left on a steal of a deal contract. You best believe you’d be adding. And don’t think you can’t get him without Nylander or Marner. We don’t want your crap prospects/late 1st as the base.
 

X66

114-110
Aug 18, 2008
13,578
7,445
And the very first post is why Leaf fans will never be taken seriously. Nylander is not going to be worth more than Hamilton. This would be like me saying Tkachuk by next year could be worth more than Matthews alone, you just have to hold onto him until then.

Matthews is on another level than Nylander, Tkachuk and Hamilton, no point in including him in this conversation.

The point is, when you're trading an elite asset in Nylander, and very good Dman + a 1st round pick, that is a lot to gut out of organization.

Nylander is already tracking very well, it would be silly to overlook his potential.

Hamilton is a solid piece to add to any team, but not at that cost, not today at least.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rockmorton

Liferleafer

TSN Scrum Lurker
Feb 9, 2011
39,848
13,005
And the very first post is why Leaf fans will never be taken seriously. Nylander is not going to be worth more than Hamilton. This would be like me saying Tkachuk by next year could be worth more than Matthews alone, you just have to hold onto him until then.
Ok, so "maybe" Hamilton is worth more than Nylander....is he worth a 52 point Dman+1st more??
 

Flamesjustwin

Registered User
Oct 8, 2010
2,529
438
London ON
This is the problem with discussing the value of Leafs fans with people who have an agenda.
They assume that a player who has been in the league for two seasons won't improve to fit their flawed narrative
Nobody is saying that. Even if Nylander becomes a 70-80 point winger he is a pure offensive winger and still won't have the value of a 24 year old also improving RHD man who led the NHL in goals scored by a D man without hardly any PP time. So when all is said and done and both develop to their potential you have a 70-80 point offensive winger vs a 60-70 point two way RHD. In no universe does the forward have more value.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Haatley

CraigsList

In Conroy We Trust
Apr 22, 2014
19,201
6,980
USA
Ok, so "maybe" Hamilton is worth more than Nylander....is he worth a 52 point Dman+1st more??

At least Hamilton can play defense, Gardiner just costed you a game in the series. So put that 52 point narrative away, he’s not a forward. Gardiner at this point is just a throw in, you guys don’t even want him anymore. Maybe a team will throw a 2nd rounder for him.
 

Liferleafer

TSN Scrum Lurker
Feb 9, 2011
39,848
13,005
NHL works a lot on precedent when negotiating trades and contracts. If we use the most recent Duchene trade as an example.

Duchene

for

OTT 2019 1st
NSH 2nd
OTT 3rd-
Shane Bowers (1st)
Vladislav Kamanev (2nd)
Sam Girard (2nd)
Looking for a 22 year old back to back 60+pont player...nope.
Looking for a 52 point Dman.....nope.
Well, you did get the 1st rounder in there.

And no, i can guarantee you that if Calgary called Dubas with this offer, Dubas wouldn't say "well, because of the Duchene trade, i have to do yhis".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brock Radunske

Liferleafer

TSN Scrum Lurker
Feb 9, 2011
39,848
13,005
At least Hamilton can play defense, Gardiner just costed you a game in the series. So put that 52 point narrative away, he’s not a forward.

Gardiner played a bad game??? Like 1 whole bad game??? Well blow me down, i guess you're right, those 52 points mean nothing!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atomos2

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
Nobody is saying that. Even if Nylander becomes a 70-80 point winger he is a pure offensive winger and still won't have the value of a 24 year old also improving RHD man who led the NHL in goals scored by a D man without hardly any PP time. So when all is said and done and both develop to their potential you have a 70-80 point offensive winger vs a 60-70 point two way RHD. In no universe does the forward have more value.
???? Hamilton played 2 minutes and 40 seconds of PP a game.
 

HockeyGuruPitka

Registered User
Jan 27, 2010
6,123
367
Toronto
why should the Leafs use a bad trade as a model for what they would do exactly? I guess we should move Liljegren (Forsberg) for Brouwer (Erat) next

a reactionary trade where the Leafs give up way too much value just because you're sad that the Leafs lost in the playoffs isn't smart, sorry.

I assume you are one of the Dermott is the saviour people? Lets be patient? Leafs are built like the pens and hawks? Keep dreaming and maybe your dreams will come true.
 

TS Quint

I can see!
Sep 8, 2012
7,860
5,170
This is the problem with discussing the value of Leafs fans with people who have an agenda.
They assume that a player who has been in the league for two seasons won't improve to fit their flawed narrative
Maybe your “agenda” is getting in the way of your reading. I said there is potential with Nylander. The poster doesn’t want to give the 24 year old defenseman who he considers already a top pair the same credit.
 

Liferleafer

TSN Scrum Lurker
Feb 9, 2011
39,848
13,005
I assume you are one of the Dermott is the saviour people? Lets be patient? Leafs are built like the pens and hawks? Keep dreaming and maybe your dreams will come true.
Correct. f*** your optimism Leafs fans....this guy knows the truth!!! The Leafs are doomed!!!

These threads are such a blast...."You don't like my lopsided proposal??? Well your team sucks anyways!!!".
 

CantLoseWithMatthews

Registered User
Sep 28, 2015
49,694
59,401
I assume you are one of the Dermott is the saviour people? Lets be patient? Leafs are built like the pens and hawks? Keep dreaming and maybe your dreams will come true.
yes, being patient is smarter than rushing to lose a trade like this and citing other bad trades as evidence for it being the right thing to do

let's try something around Marner (Hall) for Hamonic (Larsson). Leafs did lose in the first round so it's time for a shakeup
 
  • Like
Reactions: Liferleafer

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
At least Hamilton can play defense, Gardiner just costed you a game in the series. So put that 52 point narrative away, he’s not a forward. Gardiner at this point is just a throw in, you guys don’t even want him anymore. Maybe a team will throw a 2nd rounder for him.
Lol so deluded...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SteadyFreddie

rent free

Registered User
Apr 6, 2015
20,427
6,114
Nobody is saying that. Even if Nylander becomes a 70-80 point winger he is a pure offensive winger and still won't have the value of a 24 year old also improving RHD man who led the NHL in goals scored by a D man without hardly any PP time. So when all is said and done and both develop to their potential you have a 70-80 point offensive winger vs a 60-70 point two way RHD. In no universe does the forward have more value.
you are delusional if you think hamilton will be a 60-70 point two way D. he doesn't have the ability to do it and he's a weak defender that may possibly get better in his own zone, unlikely though.
 

Liferleafer

TSN Scrum Lurker
Feb 9, 2011
39,848
13,005
They really don’t if he can’t even half-ass play defense.
Translation, i have never watched Jake Gardiner play. Question, Hamilton ever have a bad game? Or is he the second coming of Bobby Orr? Because if your pathetic reasoning to knock Jake Gardiner down is a bad game 7 in the playoffs....then maybe someone might ask if Hamilton is so much better, why exactly wasn't he in the playoffs?
 

Ziggdiezan

Registered User
Apr 10, 2015
10,847
5,676
They really don’t if he can’t even half-ass play defense.
I would wager you didn't even watch the leaf Boston series and probably don't watch the Leafs play much during the regular season. Instead you just peddle some BS narrative you heard from others.

Gardiner's poor defensively abilities are extremely overblown on this website. I doubt if he was as bad as people say he would have lead the Leafs in ATOI at even strength while having tougher zone usage than guys like Hamilton.
 

Flamesjustwin

Registered User
Oct 8, 2010
2,529
438
London ON
you are delusional if you think hamilton will be a 60-70 point two way D. he doesn't have the ability to do it and he's a weak defender that may possibly get better in his own zone, unlikely though.
Like I am remotely going to take anything you say seriously given your posting history.
 

HockeyGuruPitka

Registered User
Jan 27, 2010
6,123
367
Toronto
Here we go again with the overrating of Nylander.

And no, Hamilton isn’t on the block. Not sure how many times it’ll take to get into everyone’s heads that we’re just listening and will only, ONLY trade him if we’re getting overpayment.

Additionally, Hamilton has been getting better and better every year, with 3 years left on a steal of a deal contract. You best believe you’d be adding. And don’t think you can’t get him without Nylander or Marner. We don’t want your crap prospects/late 1st as the base.

This i fully understand, and wonder if my original proposal "Nylander, Gardiner + 1st" was enough of an over payment from your perspective.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad