Since the start of last season, only Carlson (0.99) and Burns (0.86) have a higher PPG average than Krug (0.83).
That man is getting paid this summer, especially considering it's a weak UFA class, supply and demand will also inflate his price. There will no doubt be GMs out there under pressure from ownership to make a big acquisition. Love Krug but I can see him beginning to price himself out of Boston.
Carlson and Burns both make 8.0 per. Lesser players than Krug like Trouba and Subban make 8.0 and 9.0 respectively. I think a rival GM offers Krug 8.0 per for 7 years without blinking. It's not so much a question that is Boston willing, but can they afford to pay him that with their cap situation as it currently stands.
Coyotes' trade for Taylor Hall a cautionary tale with deadline on horizon - Sportsnet.ca
PK Subban is absolutely atrocious in his own end. krug looks like Rod Langway compared to him.Offensive yes he’s as good as those guys but he doesn’t come remotely close to them in the defensive zone.
PK Subban is absolutely atrocious in his own end. krug looks like Rod Langway compared to him.
Brett Burns also isn't much better than PK in his own end. He's big, but he gets caught out of position way too often, I'd take Krug in the defensive zone over those two.
He's going to get paid upward of 8mil per if he chooses to leave Boston.
Offensive yes he’s as good as those guys but he doesn’t come remotely close to them in the defensive zone.
Meanwhile, if Krug hits July 1st you can be guaranteed that there will be several GMs lined up to offer him 8 million per over 7 years. I can tell you right here, right now, NHL GMs would chase Krug over Subban right here today and it's not even close IMO.
Burns isn't that strong in his own zone. Hence one reason he played as a winger a lot during the 1st half of his career. Subban isn't much defensively either, and his offense has dropped off.
Trouba is better defensively but can't carry Krug's jock in the offensive side of the game and overall is a very overrated player.
The only one who is in Krug's realm offensively and I would consider much better defensively is Carlson, who doesn't get enough credit for his defensive play.
Back to Subban, look at it this way. The Predators wanted to move him out and could only find one team willing to take on his entire 9.0 million per salary. Every other GM wanted the Preds to eat some salary. And they return on the trade was basically nothing.
Meanwhile, if Krug hits July 1st you can be guaranteed that there will be several GMs lined up to offer him 8 million per over 7 years. I can tell you right here, right now, NHL GMs would chase Krug over Subban right here today and it's not even close IMO.
Now that the Bruins have cleared the Cap space, assuming they resign Krug , I wonder what kind of term and $$.
he`s not nearly as "bad" defensively as some make it soundAs bad as Krug is defensively he's still miles better than Morgan Rielly in the D zone
I've actually liked Krug's defense this year.
I've actually liked Krug's defense this year.
He has definitely improved back there. For a long time he was an absolute train wreck in his own end. One thing he can't overcome is lack of size/strength though.
he`s not nearly as "bad" defensively as some make it sound
He has his deficiencies but most of those come from something he can`t control and that`s size. I see the same with Grizz
He has definitely improved back there. For a long time he was an absolute train wreck in his own end. One thing he can't overcome is lack of size/strength though.
Well this is right, size matters here and skill is only going to take you so far playing D. Same with Gryz and I have never been or will for that matter , be comfortable with two smallish D , especially in the PO's. I don't give Krug much more than what he's already making and watch the term as well because he'll likely breakdown early too. 6M max 5 years my best offer.
Another concern when re-uping Krug is the expansion draft. Who do you protect?