- Oct 31, 2007
- 17,949
- 16,856
Pretty decent explanation here:
That's really interesting.
I hope they are getting paid a ton from NHL teams, scouting bureaus, and the like. Because, holy smokes is that a labor intensive effort.
Pretty decent explanation here:
Poor Krug. He gets mauled. He seems to lose it, and appears almost on the verge of taking a bad penalty on Perron. He controls himself, gets composure and lands a huge, clean hit on Thomas. A hit that certainly appeared to charge up the crowd and the bench."It’s not often you see a guy throw a hit like that without a helmet on, especially a small person like that." --63
Good,bad,good,bad
He and Gryz are always the tale of 2 performances in one game,good and bad,the passing is half terrible.wasn't his best game
but prior to tonight, the Bruins were on a 7 game winning streak
come on
He and Gryz are always the tale of 2 performances in one game,good and bad,the passing is half terrible.
He wasn't tremendous last night, but he wasn't bad. I certainly wouldn't put him anywhere near the negative 3 stars on the night.
If his bad days are he is Bostons 3rd best defenseman on the night, while I can live with that
Who would you say was better than Krug last night? I'm genuinely curious. I don't really think anyone had a great game on the backend, but Krug was the only player that could get the puck out of the zone and had some really nice stretch passes to get into the offensive zone.
wasn't his best game
but prior to tonight, the Bruins were on a 7 game winning streak
come on
Fair enough, maybe McAvoy was better. Maybe Carlo. I think ultimately we are making the same point, that Krug wasn't the problem last night. He wasn't the wrecking ball he was in game 1, but was surprised to see people call him out after that game.
It's just maddening when he makes some great plays,and then many of his passes absolutely suck. Gotta take him shift by shift.He wasn't tremendous last night, but he wasn't bad. I certainly wouldn't put him anywhere near the negative 3 stars on the night.
If his bad days are he is Bostons 3rd best defenseman on the night, while I can live with that
It's just maddening when he makes some great plays,and then many of his passes absolutely suck. Gotta take him shift by shift.
Gryz is even worse,some great stuff mixed in with some awful stuff.exactly, he tries to make plays that most of the B`s other D-men don`t attempt, risk-reward type plays
Gryz is even worse,some great stuff mixed in with some awful stuff.
Yeah Carlo was struggling big time.Absolutely not Carlo.
Gryz is even worse,some great stuff mixed in with some awful stuff.
both have their plus and minuses
but I prefer Grz ability to retrieve and bring out the puck out of the zone
it is a thing of a beauty
exactly, he tries to make plays that most of the B`s other D-men don`t attempt, risk-reward type plays
Gotta keep this guy, he isn't gonna break the bank he will be respectful to the bruins winning culture like bergy, marchy and pasta.