RANGERS13ADL
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2020
- 127
- 27
I still think the leafs move kap/aj /Kerfoot+ for a dmen at some point, then make a move for Ritchie to replace which ever piece they lose.
AGREED
I still think the leafs move kap/aj /Kerfoot+ for a dmen at some point, then make a move for Ritchie to replace which ever piece they lose.
Ya I think his expectations are higher due to the 37 pont seasons(which was really more of an outlier) … and hes trying to replicate that.
He just needs to simplify his game again... play physical, smart and within your lane.
Ducks fan just suggested Ritchie...don't hate that either.We need more tbh. Clifford and Muzzin are a start. Kapanen looked more physical too after seeing CLifford do his thing last night
Whether it's a TOp 4 D-man or a back-end D-man...I hope whoever we acquire has grit/physicality to their game.
A top 9 Powerforward type of player would go along way too. Marcus Foligno for example would be great
Ducks fan just suggested Ritchie...don't hate that either.
Ducks fan just suggested Ritchie...don't hate that either.
Yeah dont mind Ritchie either.
Ever since his contract negotiation taking long, and BM having a history of not keeping players like that... ive had a feeling hed end up in Toronto.
Yeah dont mind Ritchie either
Would be a good add with the extra year on his contract. Leafs should have room for both
Would Bracco and a 5th/6th work? This is a straight up Q and not my beliefs of a even trade for all the crazies out there.. Im simply asking the cost of Ritchie
The hard part of moving Ritchie is he is cost control, brings a phyiscal/edgieness to his game, and still has more offensive potential.
So far in his career hes been a physical 30 point guy... he had a season where he paced at 40 point.
Obviously the market has a lot of influence in a Ritchie move.... not even sure how many teams will be looking for a player like him. idk what a a realistic deal for Ritchie would be, personally I don't have much desire for bracco. And id hope the ducks were at least aiming at a 2nd round pick, or 3rd + prospect.
Ooopsie...I just want a nice boring 3rd....after our last 2 games, i could live without the excitment...lol
Yup! Already into the liquid medications preparing for tonight!!!Ooopsie...
I'm worried, did you survive ?
Than you have a reading problem (past vs. present) and I would also say NO.I do like the kings fans saying "hes not an awful fighter, he just doesn't use defense"
wouldn't that be a sign of an awful fighter? lol
LolThan you have a reading problem.
Besides, if you go all in and win fair and square, does that make you a poor fighter ?
Was Mike Tyson a poor fighter because he couldnt handle more than three rounds ?
I see nothing to “lol” about.
A former Leaf executive used to say: "The team that ends up with the best player always wins the trade".
So I'd like to ask you:
Who wins the trade? Who is the best player in the deal?
A former Leaf executive used to say: "The team that ends up with the best player always wins the trade".
So I'd like to ask you:
Who wins the trade? Who is the best player in the deal?
No kidding, Einstein.Lol
Clifford isnt the mike tyson of the nhl
I do like the kings fans saying "hes not an awful fighter, he just doesn't use defense"
wouldn't that be a sign of an awful fighter? lol
Statistically i assume people that dont fight with defense in mind generally lose a decent amount of fights.No? Colton Orr, for example, didn't know the meaning of the word defence in a fight.
A former Leaf executive used to say: "The team that ends up with the best player always wins the trade".
So I'd like to ask you:
Who wins the trade? Who is the best player in the deal?
Statistically i assume people that dont fight with defense in mind generally lose a decent amount of fights.
Orr could be an outlier, clifford isnt tho
Clifford used to tune a load fighters up when he first came into the league by just throwing, after he got tagged by Reaves he became more defensive.