Confirmed with Link: [TOR/FLA] TOR acquires G Michael Hutchinson for 2020 5th Round Pick

Discussion in 'Toronto Maple Leafs' started by Cor, Dec 29, 2018.

  1. A1LeafNation

    A1LeafNation Tavares Strong!!!

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2010
    Messages:
    14,491
    Likes Received:
    3,396
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Lol did you just compare Mac to gio??
     
  2. Kiwi

    Kiwi Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2016
    Messages:
    10,864
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    The Naki
    Hutchinson had been brutal in Florida this season, that's why he got through

    While Sparks looks terrible technically his record is good, his numbers are OK and his HDCA number is excellent, he's also mid 20’s with a great minor league career, he's got every opportunity of being grabbed

    So your plan for our goalie depth is Kaskisou not sucking all of a sudden?

    Salt, I've got to say I'm not understanding your position on this, as soon as we picked Sparks at the start of the season we were stuck with him this year, we're committed and potentially ******* the goalie depth again after our #3G just played 5 games in a row because of injury makes my brain hurt
     
    Jozay likes this.
  3. saltming

    saltming Fan Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    15,206
    Likes Received:
    2,119
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Hutch playing in fla and here are 2 different things. Not fair to judge him that way.
    If we look at the 2 just in their games with us, the only thing sparks has is the win record, and that's due to the team in front of him. Also, I was talking career numbers.
    Also our goalie depth only takes a hit IF sparks gets picked up. it's a calculated risk. Name a team that would be fine if their starter and their backup went down. I'm sure there might be a couple teams, but the general consensus would likely be no.

    None of sparks' AHL numbers mean squat when his NHL numbers don't reflect he can make the jump to the NHL.
    So you mention sparks' HDCA %, what about his LDCA%?
    And why are we stuck with him?
     
  4. Notsince67

    Notsince67 Papi and the Lamplighters

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    4,266
    Likes Received:
    1,910
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Gender:
    Male
    Let's do this again. How do you conclude that I am comparing the two with my statement "Not really. That kind of logic would support keeping Zaitsev over Giordano". Only somebody with grade school reading comprehension would paint my words as anything but a comparison of contrasts. Read slower next time.
     
  5. Kiwi

    Kiwi Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2016
    Messages:
    10,864
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    The Naki
    I'm not allowed to judge him in Florida? Why's that exactly? If I say he sucked there and that's why he cleared waivers I hardly see that as controversial

    Sparks was playing the back half of b2b, he didn't get a consistent run of games that Hutchinson is getting right now, that also needs to be taken into account as well as Sparks win record and his HDCA%

    Guess what? We don't have a depth issues if we don't put Sparks on waivers, no risk involved and why would you put yourself in a position where you don't have an actual #3 in case of emergency? Thats not particularly smart now is it if we just traded a 5th to get one 2 weeks ago

    We choose Sparks as the backup, putting him on waivers now for Hutchinson is dumb
     
  6. Suntouchable13

    Suntouchable13 Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    29,927
    Likes Received:
    2,309
    Trophy Points:
    231
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Thornhill, ON
    But then you hold his numbers on a last place team in 2016 against him? Why can't we ignore those but ignore Hutch's numbers in Florida this season? All numbers should count. You can't just cherry pick what is most convenient.
     
    Kiwi likes this.
  7. Kiwi

    Kiwi Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2016
    Messages:
    10,864
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    The Naki
    You used one of the worst comparisons in the history of comparisons and still didn't get down to debunking the asset management narrative I was forwarding

    That's some effort
     
  8. socko

    socko Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2013
    Messages:
    3,405
    Likes Received:
    1,286
    Trophy Points:
    109
    Location:
    Martinez, GA
    Doubling down on your mistakes is a sign of a guy who wasn't ready for the job. Hutch is better.
     
  9. saltming

    saltming Fan Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    15,206
    Likes Received:
    2,119
    Trophy Points:
    141
    I understand the logic of not exposing sparks so we can lay that to rest.
    Why should we evaluate a sub par goalie playing on a sub par team vs a sub par goalie playing on a top team when we can evaluate them both on the same team? That evens the playing field. If we are going to be looking at the 2 of them, that seems the fair way to do it to me. Either that or career records. Anything else to me seems like cherry picking because we have the opportunity to evaluate both under the same conditions.
     
    RLF likes this.
  10. Kiwi

    Kiwi Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2016
    Messages:
    10,864
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    The Naki
    I think Hutchinson could be the better player, it still makes zero sense to waive Sparks however so he can be the backup
     
  11. saltming

    saltming Fan Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    15,206
    Likes Received:
    2,119
    Trophy Points:
    141
    I'm not. I'm saying it's fair to evaluate both in the same situation because we can. Also I'm not omitting Hutchenson's time with Florida when I've said let's look at their career stats, nor did I say let's just look at sparks' stats from the tank year.
    Also I do not evaluate goalies on win loss record as imo that's a team stat. Sv% is what I use. So either we level the playing field, judge them on the same team in the same system or look at their career numbers.
    I would think cherry picking would be choosing a scenario which would be solely beneficial for my point, I'm looking for equality.
     
  12. saltming

    saltming Fan Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    15,206
    Likes Received:
    2,119
    Trophy Points:
    141
    I do understand and see the logic of that thought train, but I also think the NHL is about winning and therefore the best team should play.
    For me, the cost of losing sparks, if that happened, would be negligible. Finding a backup is tricky, but there are many of them flying around the league.
     
    DarkKnight likes this.
  13. Maple Leafs

    Maple Leafs Toronto

    Joined:
    May 11, 2017
    Messages:
    7,591
    Likes Received:
    1,949
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Leafs need 3 goalies in the system that can start an NHL game, Sparks will stay to seasons end unless Dubas trades for another and then spatks gets waived
     
  14. Notsince67

    Notsince67 Papi and the Lamplighters

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    4,266
    Likes Received:
    1,910
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Gender:
    Male
    You submitted a binary factor which was age without acknowledging any difference in skill. I pointed out a perfect example that shows that a 35 year old player can be more desirable than a person in his 20s. I actually smashed your position quite handily. Mcbackbup is better and age shouldn't have been the sole consideration for so so called good asset management position. Stop digging a hole
     
  15. DarkKnight

    DarkKnight Opinions

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    Messages:
    8,496
    Likes Received:
    6,141
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Occupation:
    Luge
    Location:
    Ontario
    How impressive is McBackup now 11-5-1 on a non playoff team.
     
  16. Polaris1010

    Polaris1010 Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2017
    Messages:
    2,212
    Likes Received:
    442
    Trophy Points:
    79
    Occupation:
    washing dishes
    Location:
    grandma's cellar
    LoL!

    Well there we go.

    Whoever made the decision to get rid of McElhinney for two guys who are not as good, deserves a beating!

    This is the point here.

    Whoever made this minor decision to get rid of McElhinney, ****ed it up.

    Now lets see how that person handles a major decision, will it be ****ed up too?

    The chances are good that it will be ****ed up too.

    :deadhorse
     
    DarkKnight likes this.
  17. Kiwi

    Kiwi Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2016
    Messages:
    10,864
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    The Naki
    Our starter has just missed 3 weeks with a groin injury and you want to potentially lose Sparks to waivers just as he gets back?

    What happens if Andersen relapses? Or we get any other goalie injury?
    Are we trading picks for another #3G?

    Are we tanking in that situation? Looks a bit like it

    Age plays a large part, that also gets tied to potential upside if Sparks works out, that's a major part of the asset management angle, 6-2-1 in his first NHL season as a backup

    McBackup is what he is, an old and very average backup that's having a couple of good years, big ******* deal, hfboards Leafs where any 35 year old plug will be looked on fondly if it means we don't actually have to feel a little pain as we try to develop our own talent

    Spare me the Gio McBackup justification, Get better examples or just leave it out, I can kill off my own brain cells I don't need you helping it along
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2019
  18. Kiwi

    Kiwi Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2016
    Messages:
    10,864
    Likes Received:
    3,012
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Location:
    The Naki
    So? Why should we care, he's not Leafs property anymore
    Are you going to quote Carrick and Leivo's numbers as well or just his?
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2019
  19. DarkKnight

    DarkKnight Opinions

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    Messages:
    8,496
    Likes Received:
    6,141
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Occupation:
    Luge
    Location:
    Ontario
    I thought winning records were all that mattered when accessing things? I would have mentioned save percentage and goals against too but felt that would be piling on. And it's funny, because if Mc was struggling I suspect they'd be posted here. Hmmmm.

    And since you mentioned it, getting a pulse for Leivo, losing Carrick so Holl can rot, not exactly feathers in our caps as it's turning out.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2019
  20. saltming

    saltming Fan Addict

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Messages:
    15,206
    Likes Received:
    2,119
    Trophy Points:
    141
    If any team loses there starter and backup they are in trouble.
    If Andersen goes down again, I would rather Hutch fill in than sparks. If Hutch goes down we are screwed weather or not sparks is still in to organization or not.
     
    DarkKnight likes this.
  21. Notsince67

    Notsince67 Papi and the Lamplighters

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2018
    Messages:
    4,266
    Likes Received:
    1,910
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Gender:
    Male
    Spare me the smarmy dismissal. The stupidity of your theories clearly has no bounds. Congratulations on doubling down yet again on a poorly thought out position. Your brain cells are clearly on their way.
     
  22. Cor

    Cor Most Likes Received By HFW Poster - 2018

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Messages:
    51,641
    Likes Received:
    9,432
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Ottawa, ON
    I actually agree with @Kiwi that waiving Sparks right now doesn’t make sense. I would leave him on the bench, and bring Hutch up for the back-to-back games. At least for a bit, as Andy gets back to being comfortable. But for the playoffs. Hutch should be the backup.


    However he’s off on McBackup. It’s fairly clear, even factoring in age, that he should of been kept. We still end up trading for Hutch most likely, which kinda just shows how easy it is to replace Sparks.


    I just don’t know what people are expecting from Sparks. He’s won games, so I’m okay with him on the roster right now, but getting rid of better goalies to develop a guy into a backup role, when you can find backups on waivers or free agency, or minor trades, seems like it’s counterproductive.

    It’s giving up the boat for the mystery box, because the mystery box.... well it could even be a boat, and we’ve always wanted one of those.
     
    saltming likes this.
  23. diceman934

    diceman934 Help is on the way.

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Messages:
    14,922
    Likes Received:
    2,066
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    NHL player factory
    Wrong.

    We did not need to put two goalies on Waivers at all one was the only one we needed to ask waivers on. It was among the worse roster decisions we have made in a while. We not only kept the worse goalie we shouod have kept two of them to then see just who was the better goalie. Sparks will not be in the NHL for long in my opinion. Then to have to use a draft pick to get another goalie makes it worse. The fact we have two 4th picks is not part of the equation at all.

    I highly doubt Sparks gets claimed but if he does so what he is horrid. And you think it is no big deal to spend assests to get another one any way.

    Babs will not comply as easy this time.
     
    DarkKnight likes this.
  24. DarkKnight

    DarkKnight Opinions

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    Messages:
    8,496
    Likes Received:
    6,141
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Occupation:
    Luge
    Location:
    Ontario
    Good idea, with the exception you've just killed whatever confidence Sparks has by doing that, clearly shows the team doesn't have confidence in him. So, we are at the same end game I envision. Cutting him loose.

    I don't think Hutch is amazing, and I actually expect a stinker coming. Still better than Sparks imho.
     
  25. DarkKnight

    DarkKnight Opinions

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2017
    Messages:
    8,496
    Likes Received:
    6,141
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Occupation:
    Luge
    Location:
    Ontario
    I know one thing for sure, you won't get a 5th for him...and really doesn't that say it all.
     
    diceman934 likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"