Top 3 Goalies of the 2010s

[tsujimoto74]

Think harder..... More recently

He managed 1 good run with Vegas. That was literally the first time in 10 years he'd been good in the playoffs. He tanked the Pens cup hopes for years by being a trainwreck in the post-season.

 

[Gurglesons]

Think harder..... More recently

A losing effort where his numbers were sub .900 when he got to the finals?

 

[JaegerDice]

Lundqvist is in a tier all his own.

After that, I went Price and Crawford, though I think strong arguments could be made for Rask and Bobrovsky.

 

[M2Beezy]

Bishop
Miller
Schnieder

 

[North Cole]

Think harder..... More recently

This is Fleury in relation to the poll, but the sword is playoff hockey, rather than DeBoer.

 

[amnesiac]

A losing effort where his numbers were sub .900 when he got to the finals?

gimme a break, he carried an expansion team to the SCF that had no business being there. They got beat by the better team, thats it. Diminish it all you want.

 

[amnesiac]

He managed 1 good run with Vegas. That was literally the first time in 10 years he'd been good in the playoffs. He tanked the Pens cup hopes for years by being a trainwreck in the post-season.

yes he was awful for 3 years from 2011-13.

And after that:
13-14: 13GP 915 SV%
14-15: 5GP 927 SV%
16-17: 15GP 924 SV%
17-18: 20GP 927 SV%

so youre way off when you say "first time in 10 years".... thats 53 playoff games of having around 923 SV%.

and Im not even saying he should be top 3, but to exclude him as one of the options is just absolutely dumb.

@slapKing why dont you add him?

 

[Northern Avs Fan]

Fleury can’t crack the top-3 here because he was worse than Luongo.

 

[amnesiac]

Fleury can’t crack the top-3 here because he was worse than Luongo.

dunno bout that... didnt play nearly as much as Flower

Fleury
545GP
318-160-45
916 SV%

playoffs
84GP
43-39-11
911 SV%


Lu
432GP
219-138-26
919 SV%

playoffs
36GP
17-18-4
918 SV%

 

[Northern Avs Fan]

dunno bout that... didnt play nearly as much as Flower

Fleury
545GP
318-160-45
916 SV%

playoffs
84GP
43-39-11
911 SV%


Lu
432GP
219-138-26
919 SV%

playoffs
36GP
17-18-4
918 SV%

Longer career I guess, but I think when both were in their primes most would have considered Luongo a better goaltender. Fleury won a shit ton of games because he played on Pit. Obviously he was a good goalie, but I never viewed him as big of a difference maker as Luongo.

 

[amnesiac]

Longer career I guess, but I think when both were in their primes most would have considered Luongo a better goaltender. Fleury won a shit ton of games because he played on Pit. Obviously he was a good goalie, but I never viewed him as big of a difference maker as Luongo.

Ill take Lu in his prime over FLeury, no question.... but this is 2010-19

 

[tsujimoto74]

yes he was awful for 3 years from 2011-13.

And after that:
13-14: 13GP 915 SV%
14-15: 5GP 927 SV%
16-17: 15GP 924 SV%
17-18: 20GP 927 SV%

so youre way off when you say "first time in 10 years".... thats 53 playoff games of having around 923 SV%.

and Im not even saying he should be top 3, but to exclude him as one of the options is just absolutely dumb.

@slapKing why dont you add him?

From 2010-2020, MAF's playoff GSAA is -16.25, and his QS% is sub .500. He's just not very good.

 

[Fatass]

Did Quick win both Cup in LA? I like guys who are multiple Cup winners. But King, and Price sure had great decades, even though they didn’t win.