I think you could make a case for Lehkonen as our top prospect tbh, the season he had against men is quite impressive to say the least.
None of the prospects we had showed much signs of improving to compete with Sergachev.
I think you could make a case for Lehkonen as our top prospect tbh, the season he had against men is quite impressive to say the least.
Let's check back on Sergachev after Sylvain Lefebvre works his magic
Our prospect depth is not enviable
Sly may never get his hands on Sergachev......
I think you could make a case for Lehkonen as our top prospect tbh, the season he had against men is quite impressive to say the least.
Let's check back on Sergachev after Sylvain Lefebvre works his magic
Our prospect depth is not enviable
I think you could make a case for Lehkonen as our top prospect tbh, the season he had against men is quite impressive to say the least.
Sergachev is first.I think you could make a case for Lehkonen as our top prospect tbh, the season he had against men is quite impressive to say the least.
You don't know at this point. He is going to turn 21 in July.I disagree. Lehtonen could develop into a very nice player for us, but so far, even after his great season, you can't think of him as a future 1rst liner, more likely to end up as a good second line winger.
A lot of scouts said of Sergachev that he has every thing to develop into a #1 Def.
Let's check back on Sergachev after Sylvain Lefebvre works his magic
Our prospect depth is not enviable