His last season in Nashville he was paid $1.25 million and scored 6 goals and had 24 assists while averaging a little over 13 minutes a night.
Nystrom who is being paid $2.5 million scored 15 goals and had 6 assists while averaging 14:51 a night.
Gaustad who is being paid $3.25 million scored 10 goals and had 11 assists while averaging 13:48 a night.
So I'll ask the question, do we value goals more, assists more, overall point production, salary per point, point per minute, etc? Cause at the end of the day, I see 30 points versus 21 points and I see half the salary in one case and almost see 2/3 the salary in the other case and wonder, wow, was the production that far off? Nystrom and Goose play the PK but the PK hasn't been that great as of late so they're not helping there. Goose does well in the faceoff dot, he was 4th in the league last year, his percentage was only 5% higher than the 30th best faceoff guy in the league. That's 5 more faceoff wins out of 100 that he gets than a guy at 53%. Is his salary worth that much more?
Detroit overpaid for him no doubt but to sit and bash his contributions while looking at numbers of others who are way more overpaid than he is is foolish IMO. And while fighting is leaving the game, there is still a need for a guy who can go and we have no one like that on our team and other teams have taken advantage of that. A guy that can pot 30 points and defend his teammates is worth as much as what Nystrom and/or Goose brought to the team last year IMO. I get it, Goose does his thing, but so did Toots. Different things that they brought to the table but we could've had an entire 4th line for what we're paying Goose. I'd bring back Toots in a heartbeat if he wanted to come back.