Edmonton East
BUT the ADvaNCEd STatS...
- Nov 25, 2007
- 6,491
- 2,447
I'll remind you of the context that started this conversation:Dude go back and read my post again. I don't think you absorbed a single word of it. Doubled down? I agreed that it was irrational.
Here, I'll say it for you. THEY ARE NOT EXACTLY THE SAME. THEY ARE DIFFERENT. THEY ARE STILL BOTH BAD. ARE YOU HAPPY NOW?
Former Vancouver Canuck Todd Bertuzzi arrested for DUI: Report | Toronto Sun
Hmm... is this going to to be just another NHLer with a DUI or is he a mess? "Swerving all over the road" is way different than getting nabbed at a check stop, especially for a 46 year old man who should be beyond stupid mistakes. Makes me wonder how he's doing overall after...everything.
No. I hope that nobody in here needs to hear this, but driving drunk is unacceptable regardless of your level of inebriation. Driving drunk is a huge danger to yourself and to other motorists, whether you'd blow a .081 or a .24. Don't do it for f***'s sakes.
While I obviously agree about not drunk driving and am strict about it myself, it's a little ridiculous to compare a DUI within margin of error of legal limit to DOUBLE and TRIPLE the legal limit.
Pretty absurd actually. You can't accidentally be 2x+ the legal limit. You can, however, be closer to .08 than you realize. Especially when you consider different body types and a variety of health factors.
^ This is where you should have dropped it...but you doubled down as if anything I said was wrong....
Accidental criminal behaviour is still criminal. .08 is a danger to everyone on the road. It is perfectly reasonable to compare all levels of drunken driving as dangerous.
I struggle to care about the distinction between recklessly operating a vehicle and super duper recklessly operating a vehicle. People shouldn’t f***in do it, full stop. Being pedantic about one level or another is not a meaningful contribution and arguing that people can “get close without realizing” outside of a medical context is dangerously close to excusing reckless behaviour.
I know that you do not intend to say those things. But arguing the semantics of which criminal behaviour is worse than the other is tasteless and unhelpful.