southpaw24
Registered User
Bettman has no say in what ASG does with the sale in regards to selling 1,2 or 3 pieces at a time.
Bettman has no say in what ASG does with the sale in regards to selling 1,2 or 3 pieces at a time.
Wow is this sale even going to happen? Come ON!!
I saw on the ticker yesterday that the deal was not completed, that's all. I just want this to be over.You just had one of the Thrashers owners come out and exactly where the deal is (80% done) and when he expects it to be completed (next week). What exactly is making you so impatient?
Bettman comments today.....
"Maybe at some point there will be a deal, maybe there will never be a deal"
"I'm not in Winnipeg," Bettman said to clarify. "I haven't been in Winnipeg.
We respect the importance of Atlanta as a city. It's a big market, but this is a franchise that's got a problem in that market."
But the issue, if there's a problem that's unsolvable, despite the grass roots hockey, despite all of the corporate headquarters, is there somebody, if it gets to this point where the current owners don't want to own it anymore, is there somebody who wants to own this franchise in Atlanta?
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=563978
Gearon's flippant statement that he doesn't know anything about hockey damages the reputation/image of the league on many levels.
Bettman is going to make this as painful as possible for ASG if it happens.
It's also odd that ASG is saying that if they just had two or three partners step up with $5m that the team would stay. Um, Tom Glavine could buy that himself...but he doesn't want to work with ASG. He HATES them.
That's the problem. With all the corporations in Atlanta, there ARE plenty that would buy the team or be a part of it. No one in their right mind would be in Atlanta Spirit's arena or be part of their group.
Bettman's wrong to say hockey in Atlanta depends on someone wanting to own the team, it depends upon someone wanting to deal with Atlanta Spirit.
1. At this point, it makes no sense for Bettman to not publically admit that things are more than just a "maybe". This deal is already at least a "probable", if not a certainty, and everyone by now knows that. Especially for a lawyer there are certainly much more accurate ways to portray the current situation without acting against anyone's interests.Bettman comments today.....
1. "Maybe at some point there will be a deal, maybe there will never be a deal"
2. But the issue, if there's a problem that's unsolvable, despite the grass roots hockey, despite all of the corporate headquarters, is there somebody, if it gets to this point where the current owners don't want to own it anymore, is there somebody who wants to own this franchise in Atlanta?
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=563978
Rj, it's not about Atlanta Spirit having bad personalities or being bad/unlikeable people, its about them being bad business men...
Levenson has a very unorthodox company of his own that is run in a very free-form spartan way. It doesn't work in the sports world.
It's not that people think they are unlikeable, its that nobody trusts them.
I just have this bad feeling that there will be a stalemate Brodie.
Indeed.He just said a bunch of vague things in lawyer speak which can be interpreted any way you want them to be.
Both stations will likely have pre- and post-game shows, as was the case for the period when CKY had PBP rights. For TV, now-a-days those always go cable so it is likely SportsNet.Shaw and MTS won't be bidding on broadcast rights, they are the pipe only not the content. Global (owned by Shaw) and CityTV would be the only over the air companies conceivably bidding (I don't see CTV going after it now that they are corporate owned rather than Moffat), but it'll be Sportsnet regional that gets the rights in my view.
As for radio, it will be interesting to see if CFRW or CJOB emerges from that fight to the death with the rights. My guess is CFRW will sell the farm to get the first contract with the team.
Winnipeg would likely rank below the 6 Canadian teams and in the middle of the US teams.That's not necessarily a bad thing. There seems to be some kind of expectation among some people that Winnipeg needs to be a top-5 revenue generator for the League and that anything less is a spectacular failure or something. Winnipeg offers some decent middle-of-the-road stability and quality reliable ownership, which is exactly what the League needs right now.
Perhaps now that Bettman KNOWS that half of ASG wants to sell all three, he's going to do what he can to force them to take that offer if it comes. Which it hasn't
How does the league go about making them take an offer?
Indeed.
And this is part of the problem. Even though he is a lawyer, he isn't making public comments outside a courtroom. I know he reports to the BOG and not the public, but as commissioner of a sports league a major part of his job is public relations. How does he expect fans and sponsors who ultimately provide this guy with a high-paying job to trust a word he says when he talks like this?
I largely agree with you, but on the counter side, part of sports is competing for front page of the sports section and first item in the local TV sports wrapup at night. In pre-Crosby days at least (probably still true today), the Penguins consistently showed an uptick in ticket sales once the football Steelers were done their season. And in Toronto, there is no doubt that Blue Jay ticket sales are impacted in April/May when the Leafs actually make the playoffs.i dont think that is case here....i know lots of people who like both....the CFL still has a television ratings edge nationally....
...
i think the return of the NHL will help the bombers....their $500 season ticket packages will look like a bargain....they are popular with young people who wont be able to choke up $4000 for NHL seats.....the CFL will benefit from the money flowing for sports entertainment in my opinion.
The NHL BoG could not pass the vote the relocation/sale to TSNE down on the basis of the arena and market size.
I am not saying that the preceding will happen. It is just a what the NHL "could" do, if so inclined.
Also. great Simpsons reference. I'm watching Jose Canseco haul a washer and dryer out of a burning building as I type this.
When the NHL needed leaverage in Glendale they called TNSE's offer for the Coyotes legitimate.
The BOG wouldn't have a leg to stand on if they voted against TNSE now.
It's a rubber stamp.
Unless they have been using TNSE all along to get what they need to salvage the southern teams. I mean, we can defenalty make the case that Winnipeg was very useful leverage to get an additional $25M from Glendale. Here we are a month later and has anyone heard from Matt H? Is the NHL going to go into another season owning a franchise in the desert? I guess it's okay from their point of view if they don't have to pay for it.
I guess Bettman is going to teach us Canadian fans once and for all that we have to learn our place in supporting the NHL.
When the NHL needed leaverage in Glendale they called TNSE's offer for the Coyotes legitimate.
The BOG wouldn't have a leg to stand on if they voted against TNSE now.
It's a rubber stamp.
Just because it is a legitamite offer doesn't mean they have to rubber stamp it.
But all I am saying is that, if the NHL choose to, they could vote against the relocation to Winnipeg.
If they choose to. Assuming it gets to that point, they will in all likelihood vote for the relocation.
If the BoG doesn't approve TNSE or turns down the relocation, it will likely be a PR disaster for the NHL.
If the NHL gave a damn, that would happen. But Canadians will still watch and go to the games.If the BoG doesn't approve TNSE or turns down the relocation, it will likely be a PR disaster for the NHL in Canada. It is one thing for the deal to fall through, it is another for the NHL to deny it from happening.