Draft
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2013
- 8,434
- 5,098
Thought of the same.
Are you reading this as a trade possibility?
Thought of the same.
Are you reading this as a trade possibility?
Therrien better not waste Bournival on the 4th line and Tinordi on the 3rd pairing with Bouillon.
Well deserving, made more easy a decision because of injuries.
But they DESERVE to be on the fully healthy lineup. Moen doesn't. Bouillon can be a good reserve in the press box.
When is the waiver draft / day when they have to hand in their 23-men roster?
I wouldn't waive Moen because somebody would pick him up for sure and I'd rather NOT have him pop up on a division rival being pissed that we demoted him from his 3rd line job down to the 4th and then ****-canned him altogether.
Bournival would be our Michael Frolik and more, hopefully.
Wait.. what?? Is'nt frolik an underachieving 1st rounder?
Even if I'm wrong , I just dont get the comparison..
Anyways .. great news! Tinordi has no business in the AHL, Bournival has been really impressive, let's wait and see!
Is that confirmed? Because if DD 44 if not on IR, then Habs are one player over the limit. Either DD44 or I would say White would have to be moved before Tuesday.
He is from the perspective of the 2006 draft, wherein he was expected to become an NHL producer. That being said, he has become an excellent energy player who can chip in with occasional offense and play on the PK. If we can get that from Bournival, that would be fantastic.
Maybe I'm reading way too much into it but Therrien was being really cryptic when answering questions about the opening day lineup. He kept saying "we're only Thursday, many things can happen before Tuesday". He also pretty much confirmed that Parros will be in the lineup. Weird.
Sounds good but one thing for sure is we'll get Bournival's effort on a consistent basis, not so sure about how much of a hardworker Frolik is. That plus MB (lol) can handle more defensively imo...
I just don't see these 2 guys as being the same kinda player, even though they might fill similar roles.
Well this send the right message, if you do well, you'll play and get the money, still I don't see these two players been ready to play all season in the main club I see them getting send down after 10 games.
Tinordi! I ****ing love this guy. Future captain.
Surprised Bournival made the team. Yes he had points but I think it was just a hot streak/luck. Then again I didn't watch most games because of work. Good luck to him. Kid is a hard worker. Take some notes Leblanc.
Speaking of Leblanc ; Bournival's meteoric rise does not bode well for the marvel of Pointe-Claire. After all they are both pretty much the same type of player, and we can't have that many 2nd-3rd line average sized two way forwards.
There goes that great theory that that were so afraid of losing Dumont on waivers...That was what? 1 day difference between the 8-men cut?
When Emelin gets back, it's really going to be a cluster**** on defense. I'm all for depth, but sitting NHL players like Bouillon, Murray, Diaz or Tinordi to make room for Emelin can not be a good thing. Then we also have Drewiske who we signed as a seventh defenseman, but he looks to be the 9th on the depth chart.
Same thing for when Parros is healthy, if the team intends to place him in the lineup. Who of Moen, White, Bournival, and Prust sits? All have a rightful claim to a roster spot, with Prust pretty much being a guarantee.
This is going to get very tricky. I can't help but think the Habs are going to need to make some space.
Sounds good but one thing for sure is we'll get Bournival's effort on a consistent basis, not so sure about how much of a hardworker Frolik is. That plus MB (lol) can handle more defensively imo...
I just don't see these 2 guys as being the same kinda player, even though they might fill similar roles.