No offense but your bias is clouding your judgment. Had this been, say, John Daly (or even someone like Dustin Johnson), you and others would be singing a different tune. Or if your friend got killed by someone under the influence of pills rather than alcohol.
I actually like Tiger. He is the best thing to ever happen to modern golf. But he is a mess right now and doesn't deserve to be coddled. The over-the-top reactions from "Tiger haters" is linked to his fans who make excuses for everything. And that's what people are doing, regardless of whether pay lip service to being against DUI in all cases.
And what "bias" would that be?
While I was a fan of Tiger and remain appreciative for all the thrills he brought me/the game of golf, I've made it abundantly clear over the past few months that I do not care/am not going to cheer for him going forward. I'd like to think that I have the ability to separate my former fanaticism of the player from personal struggles that millions of Americans suffer from and one that has affected my life personally with the loss of my friend. I would hope those who have done nothing but denigrated Tiger for the past 20 years and derived perverse glee from his struggles could do the same though I know on both sides of the spectrum there are plenty of people who refuse to do so. Trying to implicate Tiger fans for soliciting these reactions is a ridiculous assertion.
I am not coddling Tiger. I explicitly stated that there is no excuse for DUI. My issue is with the way the media and certain prominent voices in the industry have covered his DUI. To leap to judgement before the facts are known, declare definitively and report on things from sources that aren't credible and run the story with sensationalist hyperbole while covering it without any tact whatsoever is embarrassing. Regardless of his celebrity, he made a major mistake that isn't defendable. But to act as if his life is in shambles to the point where he's driving around and purposefully putting others lives at risk is missing the forest from the trees. We should instead be concerned about what transpired that eventually led to him lacking the judgement to realize that he had no business operating a motor vehicle. If we're going to operate in hypotheses, the fact that he pulled over and had enough sense to realize that something was wrong is more than enough evidence that his reaction to his medication was something he wasn't expecting to occur.
As for my friend, I said the driver that killed him was DUI. Never specified if it was drugs or alcohol. But actually, it was a combination of narcotics and alcohol. I have no desire to dredge up the memories any more than that, I'm sure you understand. And as for having a double standard and judging others differently, I won't speak for others but I take offense to that suggestion personally considering this is something that is very personal to me and again, I'd like to think that regardless of who committed a DUI I would judge them in a similar fashion regardless of my personal interests from a rooting perspective.