Thoughts on the Jones deal?

Do you like the trade?


  • Total voters
    179

Dr Salt

Bedard saved me
Feb 26, 2019
1,604
879
ym
People here seem to not understand that most people in the analytics community have come to the consensus that public models undervalue Kane due to his style of play, and being a guy who has outperformed his xG in 11 of his 14 years of his career. The models are flawed but even with the flaws, if the margin of error is still in the middle on Seth Jones, the most optimistic margin of error is far from encouraging from his contract.

I want to be wrong about Jones, and I want him to be an elite 1D, but the results in Columbus the past couple of seasons have pointed to otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JaegerDice

JaegerDice

The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
Dec 26, 2014
25,113
9,314
I think Mike Kelly of SportLogiq, which works directly with NHL teams analytic departments, sums it up nicely.

SethJonesweighted.png


These are not the type of numbers that warrant a long-term contract at $9.5 million a year.

Can Seth Jones live up to his massive contract after trade to Blackhawks?

By their modeling, roughly 20-30% of the defensemen in the league are better than Jones in any of the key areas of defensive play, and as a whole (Adjusted D percentile), 1 in 4 dmen are better than Seth Jones when accounting for deployment and usage.

It's worth a read. Kelly falls in the middle. He doesn't think Jones is as bad as most of the analytics models suggest, but he doesn't think he's elite or likely ever to be either. He basically says that the player has little hope of warranting the price paid in assets and cap.
 

Pez68

Registered User
Mar 18, 2010
18,485
25,437
Chicago, IL
I think Mike Kelly of SportLogiq, which works directly with NHL teams analytic departments, sums it up nicely.

SethJonesweighted.png




Can Seth Jones live up to his massive contract after trade to Blackhawks?

By their modeling, roughly 20-30% of the defensemen in the league are better than Jones in any of the key areas of defensive play, and as a whole (Adjusted D percentile), 1 in 4 dmen are better than Seth Jones when accounting for deployment and usage.

It's worth a read. Kelly falls in the middle. He doesn't think Jones is as bad as most of the analytics models suggest, but he doesn't think he's elite or likely ever to be either. He basically says that the player has little hope of warranting the price paid in assets and cap.

It couldn't possibly be that Jones is one of those outliers. An elite player that analytics doesn't properly account for? You know, kind of like Kane? I mean, the margin of error in all of these models is massive. It's why you constantly see a bunch of elite players listed with a bunch of f***ing grinders, who aren't even in a remotely similar category of player.

Let's also see how Jones plays away from Torts....
 
  • Like
Reactions: clydesdale line

JaegerDice

The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
Dec 26, 2014
25,113
9,314
It couldn't possibly be that Jones is one of those outliers. An elite player that analytics doesn't properly account for? You know, kind of like Kane? I mean, the margin of error in all of these models is massive. It's why you constantly see a bunch of elite players listed with a bunch of f***ing grinders, who aren't even in a remotely similar category of player.

It's always possible, just as any player scouted to be the next superstar can end up as a flop.

There is not perfect system for player prediction. If there were, there would be no bad draft picks, no bad contracts, no bad trades, etc. Everybody would have a perfect understanding of every players value at any given moment and into the future.

That said, we can either treat hockey as some magical black box that we'll never understand, or try and iterate, and discuss and evaluation along the way in hopes of getting better (not just as fans, but as a sport overall).
 

crazyhawk

Registered User
Apr 8, 2011
2,878
1,311
In the Hills
Is his two year waited average from the last two years?
If yes then we perhaps have to take into account the state of the team, coaching, chemistry, Columbus exodus issue etc etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wahsnairb

Pez68

Registered User
Mar 18, 2010
18,485
25,437
Chicago, IL
It's always possible, just as any player scouted to be the next superstar can end up as a flop.

There is not perfect system for player prediction. If there were, there would be no bad draft picks, no bad contracts, no bad trades, etc. Everybody would have a perfect understanding of every players value at any given moment and into the future.

At no point in his career has he ever played with the talent at forward that this team will have. WHO you move the puck to is just as important as how quickly and accurately you move that puck. Again, linemates matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wahsnairb

JaegerDice

The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
Dec 26, 2014
25,113
9,314
At no point in his career has he ever played with the talent at forward that this team will have. WHO you move the puck to is just as important as how quickly and accurately you move that puck. Again, linemates matter.

Is his two year waited average from the last two years?
If yes then we perhaps have to take into account the state of the team, coaching, chemistry, Columbus exodus issue etc etc.

The problem is that he doesn't just have to be better than he ever was in Columbus, he has to be MUCH better to make the price paid in assets and cap hit worthwhile. That is a massive ask of any player, to literally be better than you ever have by a huge margin.
 

wahsnairb

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
5,240
2,558
The problem is that he doesn't just have to be better than he ever was in Columbus, he has to be MUCH better to make the price paid in assets and cap hit worthwhile. That is a massive ask of any player, to literally be better than you ever have by a huge margin.

If he is consistently in the top 5-10 of Norris voting (something he has already done), you’re getting a top 1D and potential elite 1D and that’s more than worth what we gave up and probably worth the contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CanadianHawks

jaysoneil

Registered User
Feb 22, 2013
2,068
2,023
IL
The problem is that he doesn't just have to be better than he ever was in Columbus, he has to be MUCH better to make the price paid in assets and cap hit worthwhile. That is a massive ask of any player, to literally be better than you ever have by a huge margin.
Have you pulled any sort of analytical data on the percentage of players that perform above or equal to the assets paid and cap hit?

There's great contracts in the league, I don't question it, but just from a quick glance, I'd guess there are far more poor active contracts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tdfxman

Pez68

Registered User
Mar 18, 2010
18,485
25,437
Chicago, IL
Have you pulled any sort of analytical data on the percentage of players that perform above or equal to the assets paid and cap hit?

There's great contracts in the league, I don't question it, but just from a quick glance, I'd guess there are far more poor active contracts.

The analytics for "contract value" are almost completely flawed. Because you have guys like Makar, Fox, McAvoy, Heiskanan, Werenski, etc. who perform like a #1 or top pairing defenseman, while on their ELC or extremely friendly contracts. These guys drive down the "average salary" for a top pairing defender by a ridiculous amount. Slavin is a top pairing defender who only makes....$5.3M. It's almost impossible to gauge "contract value" because of this. Players are worth what the market is willing to pay for them.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad