People here seem to not understand that most people in the analytics community have come to the consensus that public models undervalue Kane due to his style of play, and being a guy who has outperformed his xG in 11 of his 14 years of his career. The models are flawed but even with the flaws, if the margin of error is still in the middle on Seth Jones, the most optimistic margin of error is far from encouraging from his contract.
I want to be wrong about Jones, and I want him to be an elite 1D, but the results in Columbus the past couple of seasons have pointed to otherwise.
I want to be wrong about Jones, and I want him to be an elite 1D, but the results in Columbus the past couple of seasons have pointed to otherwise.