The thing about the issue that strikes me is how rookies in the AHL drop so drastically as if they were expected to dominate right off the start. It's pretty unrealistic to me.
For instance, Jared Boll is ranked ahead of Adam Pineault in Columbus. Pineault has had a really solid year in the AHL thus far as a rookie and looks to be a pretty safe bet to crack Columbus in the next few years. Meanwhile, Boll definitely has potential, but how he passes Pineault while posting only decent numbers on a stacked team in the OHL, even for a tough guy, is beyond me. He certainly isn't ahead of him on HF's list, where Pineault is #4 and Boll unrated (although probably should be somewhere 10-20).
For Chicago, David Bolland has dropped out of the top 50 and somehow all the way to #10 with the Hawks (still #3 for Chicago on HF), all the while producing at a clip that will see him get 40-50 points in the AHL this season. I'm not sure what was expected of him, but those are very solid numbers for a 20 year old still looking to put on some muscle (that always comes easier at 23 than at 20).
The same thing happened to Schremp, Montoya and a few others. It's as if the those ranking don't appreciate what a quantum leap it is to go from junior to the AHL.
The rankings are still solid, this was just one trend with the Future Watch where it seemed so much more credit is given to junior numbers, where as a player who makes a decent imact as a rookie in the AHL all of a sudden drops.