Blade Paradigm
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2017
- 823
- 1,172
In March of 1986, Vancouver Canucks coach and assistant general manager Tom Watt famously said "there's no question we have too many young players."
Three months later, the Canucks traded Cam Neely and their first-round pick in 1987 for Barry Pederson.
"There's no question we have too many young players. It's difficult to compete, for example, when you have less than 1,000 games of NHL experience among your six defencemen some nights. Mistakes made behind your own blueline cost you, and we have a lot of young fellows back there. It takes time to mature in the National Hockey League, especially on defence.
With youth, there's optimism that things are going to get better. But youth doesn't always mean good, and older players doesn't always mean bad. There's a danger that you can always be building and you never get there.
Sometimes, I get concerned that we put too much (emphasis) on young players and try to rush them to be leaders before they're really ready." - Tom Watt, March 1986
"Cam Neely, a rugged, 205-pound right winger at age 20, is a prime example. Neely was rushed into the Canuck lineup as a raw rookie in 1983. He's had moderate success, with 21 goals last season, but this year has been a disaster.
Neely has scored only eight times and his confidence has deteriorated. A product of the underage draft, Neely's career would have been better served by a longer training period in junior." - Grant Kerr, The Globe and Mail, March 7, 1986
The Canucks had planned to sign Pederson and pay the compensation, which would have been two first-round draft choices or one first-round choice plus the fifth-best player on their roster. By making the formal trade, compensation did not need to be worked out." - William Houston, The Globe and Mail, June 7, 1986
Three months later, the Canucks traded Cam Neely and their first-round pick in 1987 for Barry Pederson.
"There's no question we have too many young players. It's difficult to compete, for example, when you have less than 1,000 games of NHL experience among your six defencemen some nights. Mistakes made behind your own blueline cost you, and we have a lot of young fellows back there. It takes time to mature in the National Hockey League, especially on defence.
With youth, there's optimism that things are going to get better. But youth doesn't always mean good, and older players doesn't always mean bad. There's a danger that you can always be building and you never get there.
Sometimes, I get concerned that we put too much (emphasis) on young players and try to rush them to be leaders before they're really ready." - Tom Watt, March 1986
"Cam Neely, a rugged, 205-pound right winger at age 20, is a prime example. Neely was rushed into the Canuck lineup as a raw rookie in 1983. He's had moderate success, with 21 goals last season, but this year has been a disaster.
Neely has scored only eight times and his confidence has deteriorated. A product of the underage draft, Neely's career would have been better served by a longer training period in junior." - Grant Kerr, The Globe and Mail, March 7, 1986
"Yesterday, the Vancouver Canucks avoided a compensation issue by trading forward Cam Neely and their first-round draft choice in the 1986 entry draft to the Boston Bruins for star centre Barry Pederson, whose contract was about to expire on July 1.Watt finding sad Canucks slow to learn
Kerr, Grant. The Globe and Mail; Toronto, Ont. [Toronto, Ont]07 Mar 1986: D.16.
...
How is it, then, that the holder of a master's degree in physical education has been unable to pry an ounce of improvement out of the Vancouver Canucks this season?
...
Watt, 50, is in his first season as head coach of the Canucks. He also doubles as assistant to the general manager, the often invisible Jack Gordon, who carries the title of director of hockey operations.
...
"There's no question we have too many young players," Watt says. "It's difficult to compete, for example, when you have less than 1,000 games of NHL experience among your six defencemen some nights.
"Mistakes made behind your own blueline cost you, and we have a lot of young fellows back there. It takes time to mature in the National Hockey League, especially on defence."
Many NHL teams try to rebuild through the draft. It's a method that can be rewarding, but just as often costs competent coaches, such as Watt, their jobs. Watt remembers having been fired by the Winnipeg Jets in 1984, less than 18 months after being named the NHL coach of the year.
...
Vancouver is a franchise that has suffered growing pains since entering the NHL in 1970 as an expansion team. There have been some good coaches - Phil Maloney and Roger Neilson come to mind - but often their hard work and dedication have been undermined by the constant influx of youth into the lineup during the building process.
"With youth, there's optimism that things are going to get better," Watt says. "But youth doesn't always mean good, and older players doesn't always mean bad.
"There's a danger that you can always be building and you never get there. Sometimes, I get concerned that we put too much (emphasis) on young players and try to rush them to be leaders before they're really ready."
Cam Neely, a rugged, 205-pound right winger at age 20, is a prime example. Neely was rushed into the Canuck lineup as a raw rookie in 1983. He's had moderate success, with 21 goals last season, but this year has been a disaster.
Neely has scored only eight times and his confidence has deteriorated. A product of the underage draft, Neely's career would have been better served by a longer training period in junior.
...
His peers readily acknowledge that Watt is a sound if not brilliant coach. He was perhaps the best coach in the history of Canadian college hockey and the NHL is looking more and more to college- trained coaches.
"My eyes were wide open when I came back to Vancouver," says Watt, who first joined the Canucks as an assistant in 1980. "You do the best you can, even though you know it's not going to be a bed of roses.
"That's what being a professional coach is all about. You try and do the job, no matter the circumstances. No matter how up or down the team is, you have to take a professional approach to the situation."
...
The Canucks had planned to sign Pederson and pay the compensation, which would have been two first-round draft choices or one first-round choice plus the fifth-best player on their roster. By making the formal trade, compensation did not need to be worked out." - William Houston, The Globe and Mail, June 7, 1986
"Sure, we gave up a lot. But we had to get Pederson. Last year, we didn't have a centre who scored 20 goals. How would you like to play the Edmonton Oilers eight times a year without a 20-goal centreman?" - Tom Watt, December 1986Eagle seeks liberty for NHL free agents
Houston, William. The Globe and Mail; Toronto, Ont. [Toronto, Ont]07 June 1986: C.3.
...
Yesterday, the Vancouver Canucks avoided a compensation issue by trading forward Cam Neely and their first-round draft choice in the 1986 entry draft to the Boston Bruins for star centre Barry Pederson, whose contract was about to expire on July 1.
...
The Canucks had planned to sign Pederson and pay the compensation, which would have been two first-round draft choices or one first-round choice plus the fifth-best player on their roster. By making the formal trade, compensation did not need to be worked out.
...
Pederson trade could be Canucks' downfall: [FINAL Edition]
Mike Beamish Southam News. The Ottawa Citizen; Ottawa, Ont. [Ottawa, Ont]02 Dec 1986: D3.
VANCOUVER - It has the potential to be the worst deal since the California Golden Seals traded their first pick in the 1971 draft to the Montreal Canadiens.
Montreal used the selection to take Guy Lafleur.
The Vancouver Canucks paid a heavy price in June to obtain centre Barry Pederson from the Boston Bruins. Not only did they give up rugged cornerman in Cam Neely, only 21 and a former first-round draft pick, but also they threw in their first choice for the 1987 NHL draft.
The star attraction in that draft will another swashbuckling French Canadian, Granby Bisons' centre Pierre Turgeon. Considering the Canucks (7-15-2) are already behind their 59-point pace of the 1985-86 season, the Bruins could own the No. 1 pick in '87.
Trading away their first choice to Montreal was the death knell for the Golden Seals. It could also be the final act for the Canucks, who have stretched the resilience and loyalty of their fans beyond limit.
Once the season began, no one on the west coast was too surprised to see Neely bolt to the top of the Bruins' scoring derby before a knee injury sidelined him. Meanwhile, Pederson struggled, while the Canucks won only two of their first 13 games.
"Sure, we gave up a lot," said Canuck coach Tom Watt, who felt it was his job to defend the Pederson trade. "But we had to get Pederson. Last year, we didn't have a centre who scored 20 goals. How would you like to play the Edmonton Oilers eight times a year without a 20-goal centreman?"
Pederson, 25, used to be one of the top three or four centres in the NHL, but that was before he missed 58 games in the 1984-85 season after surgery to remove a fibrous tumor from his right bicep. There was concern his career might be over, but after a slow start in the '85-'86 season, Pederson finished with 29 goals and 76 points in Boston.
Pederson's arm is a constant reminder of what he has gone through. A long line of scar tissue snakes from the shoulder to the elbow.
"The scar is a big thing with everyone," Pederson concedes. "I don't feel it will be an issue for the rest of my career; I feel it's behind me. I feel I'll have a greater chance of injuring my knee than having problems with my arm again. Still, the scar is there and I guess people feel they're entitled to keep asking about it."
Doctors tell Pederson he'll probably have a greater chance of winning the Stanley Cup in Vancouver than having a recurrence of the tumor.
Last edited: