In fairness to Torts, they were pretty dominated when they were out there
And the Dubi-Nash-Jenner line was fairly dominant.
In fairness to Torts, they were pretty dominated when they were out there
**** Marchand for that cheap shot punch to Harrington’s head during the net scramble when the refs were focused on other tangle ups. Absolute dick. Did anyone else see this?
Thanks! I watched coach's corner replay this morning on youtube. I've watched him for decades and it's true he's getting worse.................The usual Bruins rah-rah-babble. I don't understand him much of the time anymore. He said Foligno was clearly offsides on the first goal. (Of course.)
In fairness to Torts, they were pretty dominated when they were out there
Yep, time to throw Texier back out there, Wennberg has ZERO confidence handling the puck in the offensive zone. Afraid to be hit, it's a shame how much of a shell of his former self he is.Wennberg is not remotely the same player he used to be . Goes to show how important the center position is , because any line he’s been put on this year , he basically makes that line not an option . Torts got absolutely lucky with some idiotic coaching decisions , thanks to Bob , but there is 0 reason Wennberg should see the ice the rest of the playoffs
In fairness to Torts, they were pretty dominated when they were out there
No surprises, Bjork and Wennberg have been real bad. Dzingel just invisible.
Dzingel had a turnover yes, but he also created a breakaway chance with his speed. He looked fine playing with Duchene, as the season wound down. Its when you put him on a line with Wennberg. Only Wennberg can make Bjorkstrand look like a bad player. I think dzingel looks totally fine playing him with a legit center.Bjorkstrand has been great in my opinion. He's winning battles, making good blocks, good passes, and is very disruptive on the forecheck. The only thing he needs is better linemates.
Wennberg has zero confidence and needs out of the lineup, everybody knows that.
For some reason people still want to give Wennberg money to Dzingel. I can't figure it out, he might be an even more useless player this series than Wennberg. I'd say he's moderately better at evens, he can still pass after all. But he's not as good without the puck and not a pivotal player on the PK.
It's funny to me when people describe a player as "invisible". Does that mean you just didn't notice him? I wish Dzingel was more invisible that game, I'd rather not see him turnover the puck.
Dzingel had a turnover yes, but he also created a breakaway chance with his speed. He looked fine playing with Duchene, as the season wound down. Its when you put him on a line with Wennberg. Only Wennberg can make Bjorkstrand look like a bad player. I think dzingel looks totally fine playing him with a legit center.
You mean the guy who afforded us our game winning goal? I'm okay with him sticking around.Big win.
Oh yeah, **** Brad Marchand.
That is all.
Marchand is trying to goad the Jackets into a Kadri-like retaliation and it's not going to work. If the Jackets win Game 4 he will push the envelope that much more. Our guys just need to stay focused and keep their eyes on the real prize.
Marchand will get fined some insignificant amount. No way does he get suspended for that. Not that he shouldn't but I just don't see it.
At some point the coaching staff and the captain need to have a discussion with the officials. If they aren't going to protect the players, the players are going to have to protect themselves. This includes the league reviewing the play. If things are going as well as they want, for a team like Boston, they are going to goon it up. A series with Boston always runs the risk of multiple, unnecessary, injuries.
Marchand was clearing doing that intentionally when most of the officials were looking elsewhere, but I did see an official that should have seen it. Honestly, I have mixed reactions about in in that I don't think he hit him all that hard. Having said that, he should have gotten a roughing at a minimum. Certainly a unsportsmanlike conduct. He was trying to get a reaction out of us and the officials aren't reigning him in. They are going to need to put some roughing calls on him or this could get out of hand.
As far as a suspension, I don't know his suspension history but in a vacuum I'd go with a pretty large fine if this hasn't happened before (suspension for similar action) with the understanding it can result in suspension next time.
Having said that I've seen a lot of players performing sucker punches all the time. I tend to think the league needs to crack down on thia. In this case it's more sever in that it was a cheap shot to the back of the head.