News Article: The whole story on Vrbata

CC96

Serious Offender
Nov 6, 2012
18,098
1,029
Mesa, Arizona
Pure shooter - that's perfect. The Sedins need a trigger-man otherwise they're playin' pass to no end.

Can he handle a cycle ? Does he score more off the rush, or puck possession?

Always interesting to see what the Sedins do to a player.

He could cycle pretty well with Ray Whitney, and has good puck possession (he had really good fancy stats this year, apparently. I think he'll be a great fit for the twins.
 

kihekah19*

Registered User
Oct 25, 2010
6,016
2
Phoenix, Arizona
Craig Button was talking about him not being a good fit with the twins and I while I agree with him often, I think he's out of his head on this one. The Sedins will open up time and space for him and he can finish - plain & simple.
 

AZviaNJ

“Sure as shit want to F*** Coyote fans.”
Mar 31, 2011
6,694
4,352
AZ
Craig Button was talking about him not being a good fit with the twins and I while I agree with him often, I think he's out of his head on this one. The Sedins will open up time and space for him and he can finish - plain & simple.
Heard Button also and I agree with you, he's wrong. Vrby is a great fit with the twins and may have 40 goals this year playing with those two.
 

Nona Di Giuseppe

Registered User
Jul 14, 2009
4,919
2,447
Coquitlam
Craig Button was talking about him not being a good fit with the twins and I while I agree with him often, I think he's out of his head on this one. The Sedins will open up time and space for him and he can finish - plain & simple.

I'm more surprised to hear that anyone agrees with Button often than I am to hear him say he doesn't imagine Vrbata fitting well with Sedins.

Should be interesting to see how it pans out. Canucks took a big step back last year, but had a lot of variables contributing to it!
 

Dolemite

The one...the only...
Sponsor
May 4, 2004
43,217
2,151
Washington DC
I'm more surprised to hear that anyone agrees with Button often than I am to hear him say he doesn't imagine Vrbata fitting well with Sedins.

Should be interesting to see how it pans out. Canucks took a big step back last year, but had a lot of variables contributing to it!

The Canucks problem last season is that they had zero depth to take the pressure off the Sedins. The way to beat the canucks was simply, shut down the Sedins and watch the other three lines struggle to hit the broad side of a barn. It was that bad and that simple to beat the Canucks last season. Mike Gillis (the right players) and Tortorella (not understanding how to assess the talents he had on his roster) didn't get this and they paid for it with their jobs (rightly so).

I think this is a great signing because Vrbata would be a perfect second line forward IF the Canucks can put the right players around him to compliment his talents.

Before the Sedins became first liners this is exactly what they did they were second and third liners (take the pressure off the first line and give opposing coaches fits for game plans). The Canucks simply did not get this last season.
 
Last edited:

TheLegend

Megathread Gadfly
Aug 30, 2009
36,860
29,044
Buzzing BoH
I hope he does.

We need to be less miserly in treating our important players that have been loyal to the organization.


Exactly how was Vrbata treated so miserly? You do not know how much the Coyotes were able to afford.

Or do you really think Vrbata is worth $5M a year?? Given that his offensive output depends entirely upon having a line mate who can feed him pucks??? I don't think he is, and I say that wishing he was still a Coyote.
 

XX

Waiting for Ishbia
Dec 10, 2002
54,938
14,667
PHX
Exactly how was Vrbata treated so miserly? You do not know how much the Coyotes were able to afford.

Or do you really think Vrbata is worth $5M a year?? Given that his offensive output depends entirely upon having a line mate who can feed him pucks??? I don't think he is, and I say that wishing he was still a Coyote.

He was willing to take less than $3m, even from an organization that didn't even offer him a contract prior to free agency. The whole situation was handled poorly.
 

DesertDawg

Registered User
Mar 6, 2002
6,271
22
Superstition Mts
ridefree.net
He was willing to take less than $3m, even from an organization that didn't even offer him a contract prior to free agency. The whole situation was handled poorly.
Why do you keep posting this? Where does it say that he was willing to take less than $3mil? And that the organization didn't negotiate before free agency? My understanding was that Vrbata didn't want to be distracted during the season and put re-signing on hold until the season ended.

He took the money, that is obvious! The Coyotes offered the same modified NTC that the Canucks gave him! I also believe that if MR waived his NMC to go to Calgary, the Coyotes would have been able to re-sign Vrbata!
 

Jakey53

Registered User
Aug 27, 2011
30,187
9,201
Why do you keep posting this? Where does it say that he was willing to take less than $3mil? And that the organization didn't negotiate before free agency? My understanding was that Vrbata didn't want to be distracted during the season and put re-signing on hold until the season ended.

He took the money, that is obvious! The Coyotes offered the same modified NTC that the Canucks gave him! I also believe that if MR waived his NMC to go to Calgary, the Coyotes would have been able to re-sign Vrbata!

Everyone is assuming this happened and that happened and so on. I guess we have to look at DM's track record and trust that what he did was right. Last year when Vrbata went MIA for much of the season, most of us were very critical of his performance, but now we are blaming DM for not signing him. How soon we forget.:)
 

TheLegend

Megathread Gadfly
Aug 30, 2009
36,860
29,044
Buzzing BoH
Why do you keep posting this? Where does it say that he was willing to take less than $3mil? And that the organization didn't negotiate before free agency? My understanding was that Vrbata didn't want to be distracted during the season and put re-signing on hold until the season ended.

He took the money, that is obvious! The Coyotes offered the same modified NTC that the Canucks gave him! I also believe that if MR waived his NMC to go to Calgary, the Coyotes would have been able to re-sign Vrbata!

Bingo....!!

All we know for sure is... Vrby would have taken less than the $5M/yr Vancouver offered.. But it also meant a locking him into 4 year deal with NTC/NMC for the entire contract.

I too believe the Ribeiro situation completely turned Maloney off to offering future NTCs or NMCs to anyone. Maloney did finally offer Vrby a limited NMC (I'm assuming for the latter 1 or 2 only)... but that essentially boiled it down to comparing the money between the two offers.
 

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,555
46,613
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
He was willing to take less than $3m, even from an organization that didn't even offer him a contract prior to free agency. The whole situation was handled poorly.

He was willing to take the sweetheart hometown deal in Arizona UNTIL the Canucks swooped in with the bigger offer. He was ALMOST willing to take the cheap deal here. I think the timeline is mixed up here.
 

RemoAZ

Let it burn
Mar 30, 2010
11,160
7,502
Glendale, Arizona
The simple fact is he got over paid. You can't blame him for taking the cash. He seems like a really good guy and I'm happy for him. We're already stuck paying our big FA signing from last year not to play here. We couldn't afford to over pay for a streaky, soft scorer that did very little in the playoffs. If we could have got him at 3 to 3.5, that would have been a solid signing. $5 mil on our team means he has to be a top line guy. That isn't Vrbata. After listening to Maloney, you'd hope all those Vrbata minutes go to Domi or some young scorer we could land in a trade. That's not looking like it's going to happen at this point. I guess we'll see.
 

KG

Registered User
Sep 23, 2010
4,872
744
A soft, streaky scorer who was reliable defensively and with only 10 guys ahead of him in the whole league with more GPG.

But ok guys, keep trying to rationalize losing Vrbata.

Losing Vrbata's production is the worst blow this team has taken since I started watching them, anyways.

Perhaps the only thing worse has been losing Ottawa Turris.
 

doaner

Registered User
Aug 21, 2008
5,397
359
SURPRISE!
A soft, streaky scorer who was reliable defensively and with only 10 guys ahead of him in the whole league with more GPG.

But ok guys, keep trying to rationalize losing Vrbata.

Losing Vrbata's production is the worst blow this team has taken since I started watching them, anyways.

Perhaps the only thing worse has been losing Ottawa Turris.

Lost him before. I'm sure we'll survive. Not sure if he will, though.
 

_Del_

Registered User
Jul 4, 2003
15,426
6,738
Selanne was worse, but at the time the team was still in Winnipeg, and I did not follow them.
 

The Nuge

Some say…
Jan 26, 2011
27,430
7,528
British Columbia
A soft, streaky scorer who was reliable defensively and with only 10 guys ahead of him in the whole league with more GPG.

But ok guys, keep trying to rationalize losing Vrbata.

Losing Vrbata's production is the worst blow this team has taken since I started watching them, anyways.

Perhaps the only thing worse has been losing Ottawa Turris.

I don't think anyone is saying losing him doesn't matter, but a 50 point forward doesn't make or break your team. There are guys that could likely fill in for him
 

awfulwaffle

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
11,901
1,930
Dallas, TX
Ok people, he's no longer a Coyote. Best of luck to him in Vancouver. Fact is, he was a streaky scorer, and we had nobody to pair with him successfully like Whitney did. Hell, probably never will. Sad to see him go, but it's part of the business.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad