The self-torture, time travelling "What if" thread of Flyers drafts and other decisions

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
186,517
38,470
One I thought of is What if the Flyers never make the huge mistake of trading their first round pick in 2008 draft (27Th overall) for Steve Eminger (who onliy played 12 games as a Flyer and a 3rd rounder.
That pick, turned out to be John Carlson, who would have looked pretty good for the last 12 years on the blueline.

Giving up a 2nd and 3rd for Andrew MacDonald (and giving him that albatross of a contract) , those 2 picks turned out to Sorokin (promising young goalie) and Brandon Carlo

and of course trading Bob to the Jackets, after the Flyers goalie coach told them once he got used to North America, he'd be a Vezina candidate. And he was...

WHat if Bob Clarke understood that you do need a quality goaltender and instead of going cheap when Hexy retired, getting Beezer (who was older than Hexy at the time) when Cujo and Richter were availabe. Lindros in his [prime with a solid goalie might have made a difference in a Cup run.

Cujo and Richter were never coming here. Nobody was telling anyone that at the time though. The Flyers got the only guy they had a chance at.

The Carlson one is the real killer though. Especially given how they couldn’t find any defensemen in the draft and overvalued the guy they did draft (luckily Bob Murray did too)

The Sharp trade does suck too since he was on the other side winning the Cup but it wasn’t the killer that not getting Carlson was. That was Holmgren’s worst move, he outsmarted himself and he never got past it.
 

MiamiScreamingEagles

Global Moderator
Jan 17, 2004
71,192
48,176
There are some many to choose from.

What if Bernie Parent and Rick MacLeish were healthy for the 1976 Cup Final? Could the Flyers have made it three Cups in a row?

What if Pelle decided to stay home like he planned and never went to the team party? I'm convinced the Flyers would have won the Cup that year and Pelle would have played another decade.

What if the Flyers don't blow that 3-1 lead to Jersey in 2000? That team was on a roll and I believe the return of Lindros knocked the chemistry off. I'm still not over that series to this day.

It is one of those situations we will never know.

The Flyers had a chance without Lindros in Game 5. The Devils won handily. The spector of a Lindros return could have weighed on the team but that was the ultimate year of the never-ending soap opera and with the coaching saga as well, the team used it to their benefit.

Lindros came back for Game 6. What stands out mostly to me was in a scoreless tie, with 2.7 seconds left in the second period, the Flyers won the faceoff and Lindros scored. Except replay showed it was a nick after time expired. Would the 1-0 lead have held? Maybe, maybe not. But if the goal counted and the Flyers win the series in six with Lindros scoring? Now we are taking something special. Something maybe better than Dave Poulin in Game 7 vs. NYI. But "if" can be such a dirty word.

The return of Lindros didn't end well in that series. That is the understatement of the century but "if" the Flyers lost in seven games without Lindros and there was speculation he could have played, there would have been plenty of criticisms from every direction blasting the team for not utilizing its franchise player in a game 7.
 
Last edited:

swami24

Registered User
Jul 24, 2020
1,741
2,271
I will hate Leon stickle to my grave.
I think Forsberg could have been a fan draw, and lead a team with the non traded assets.
We win in 2000 if Steven's doesnt flatten 88.
Pelle was a crushing loss, but Hexy made up for it in 87.
Patrick Kane instead of JVR?
 

Rebels57

Former Flyers fan
Sponsor
Sep 28, 2014
76,541
122,965
It is one of those situations we will never know.

The Flyers had a chance without Lindros in Game 5. The Devils won handily. The spector of a Lindros return could have weighed on the team but that was the ultimate year of the never-ending soap opera and with the coaching saga as well, the team used it to their benefit.

Lindros came back for Game 6. What stands out mostly to me was in a scoreless tie, with 2.7 seconds left in the second period, the Flyers won the faceoff and Lindros scored. Except replay showed it was a nick after time expired. Would the 1-0 lead have held? Maybe, maybe not. But if the goal counted and the Flyers win the series in six with Lindros scoring? Now we are taking something special. Something maybe better than Dave Poulin in Game 7 in 1985 vs. NYI. But "if" can be such a dirty word.

The return of Lindros didn't end well in that series. That is the understatement of the century but "if" the Flyers lost in seven games without Lindros and there was speculation he could have played, there would have been plenty of criticisms from every direction blasting the team for not utilizing its franchise player in a game 7.

I remember that Lindros goal well. It was less than a second after the buzzer. Fate was not on our side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlyerFaithful17

Joeflyers

Registered User
Oct 7, 2006
37
0
I remember that Lindros goal well. It was less than a second after the buzzer. Fate was not on our side.
And they let time run off the clock after whistle right before it. I remember saying they have to put more time back on the clock here. Was shocked that it didn't happen and then of course heartbroken.
 

JojoTheWhale

CORN BOY
May 22, 2008
33,469
104,530
I'll give you one not brought up nearly enough -- Couturier telling management he wants a bigger role. Hakstol wasn't getting there on his own.

Does the Schenn trade still happen? Does Schenn get a real shot at Center here? Obviously it means potentially no Farabee. Does it actually mean no Frost or does it instead mean no Ratcliffe? Do they still feel comfortable giving up so much draft capital to move up in Round 2 at all?

It means probably a pick well into the lottery instead of JOB. That could have been Farabee or not. Hakstol probably gets fired much, much earlier. Does Hextall go with him or is he still in the job now? They're putrid if he's not playing big Minutes with appropriate linemates. That could trigger a full rebuild as early as 2018.
 
Last edited:

kudymen

Hakstok was a fascist clique hiver lickballs.gif
Jun 18, 2011
22,824
44,263
Atlanta (Decatur)
Yes. Supposedly, Tampa Bay's GM didn't want to move the defenseman.

source.gif
 

BritainStix

F**k Cutter Gauthier
Oct 20, 2016
6,592
9,658
I don't like playing this game.

But it also works the other way.

What if the flyers don't trade Alexi Zhitnick for Braydon Coburn.

How about tollefson for Leino.

What if that no name defenseman is still on the board instead of Giroux.

Thats just the last 15 years.
 

Normand Lacombe

Registered User
Jan 30, 2008
1,442
1,352
It is one of those situations we will never know.

The Flyers had a chance without Lindros in Game 5. The Devils won handily. The spector of a Lindros return could have weighed on the team but that was the ultimate year of the never-ending soap opera and with the coaching saga as well, the team used it to their benefit.

Lindros came back for Game 6. What stands out mostly to me was in a scoreless tie, with 2.7 seconds left in the second period, the Flyers won the faceoff and Lindros scored. Except replay showed it was a nick after time expired. Would the 1-0 lead have held? Maybe, maybe not. But if the goal counted and the Flyers win the series in six with Lindros scoring? Now we are taking something special. Something maybe better than Dave Poulin in Game 7 in 1985 vs. NYI. But "if" can be such a dirty word.

The return of Lindros didn't end well in that series. That is the understatement of the century but "if" the Flyers lost in seven games without Lindros and there was speculation he could have played, there would have been plenty of criticisms from every direction blasting the team for not utilizing its franchise player in a game 7.

MSE, you make several good points and I'm now on the fence about this. On one hand, Lindros was still the best player on the team and was the best Flyer player in Game 6. In no way do I believe Lindros was selfish in coming back as he wanted to help the team win the Cup. On the other hand, the Flyers were badly outplayed by NJ in Game 6, I've wondered if more than just a few players weren't adversely affected by his return. Nonetheless, those same players had over two periods during Game 7 after Stevens' hit to put a puck behind Brodeur and they failed.
 

Here4ThaLids

“Sunshine has always been our enemy.”
Sep 28, 2018
3,084
8,714
MSE, you make several good points and I'm now on the fence about this. On one hand, Lindros was still the best player on the team and was the best Flyer player in Game 6. In no way do I believe Lindros was selfish in coming back as he wanted to help the team win the Cup. On the other hand, the Flyers were badly outplayed by NJ in Game 6, I've wondered if more than just a few players weren't adversely affected by his return. Nonetheless, those same players had over two periods during Game 7 after Stevens' hit to put a puck behind Brodeur and they failed.

I've heard Keith Jones say multiple times that this was the case -- not just them standing around waiting for Eric to do something, but a sense of the team that worked so hard together to make things happen suddenly having to make room.

Then again, Keith Jones likes to tell stories, so who knows?
 

Redpath

Registered User
Sep 30, 2011
3,226
4,788
1987: Tim Kerr being hurt.

2000: Lindros, 3-1, Stevens.

2004: Desjardins being hurt, and Bobby Clarke liquidating Weinrich and Therrien for draft picks with the lockout/cap looming.

2010: Ray Emery being hurt. Competent goaltending wins us Game 1 in Chicago at the very least.

Thinking about 1987, 2000, 2004, and 2010 just makes me sick.
 

Bob Clarke Fan Club

Registered User
Feb 14, 2003
6,194
473
Visit site
1987: Tim Kerr being hurt.

2000: Lindros, 3-1, Stevens.

2004: Desjardins being hurt, and Bobby Clarke liquidating Weinrich and Therrien for draft picks with the lockout/cap looming.

2010: Ray Emery being hurt. Competent goaltending wins us Game 1 in Chicago at the very least.

Thinking about 1987, 2000, 2004, and 2010 just makes me sick.






Good thing you weren't around for the early 80's.
 

wankstifier

All glory to the harvest god
Jun 19, 2018
7,714
11,131
Joel Farabee alone is looking like he might wind up being a better player. Add whatever you get out of Frost to that, and I’m not sure how this take wound up here.

Had to wait three full seasons for equivalent NHL value and that’s if Farabee continues his good play. Also had to take on a total cap dump for two seasons? It’s arguable that Frost + Farabee should’ve approximated Schenn’s production as soon as last season. Still, it was a total short term loss. And Hextall traded the wrong forward!
 

Larry44

#FireTortsNOW
Mar 1, 2002
11,932
7,257
Bobby Clarke, having narrowly survived Jay Snider's attempt to can him after missing the playoffs in 89-90, steps up to the rostrum.

"With the 4th selection in the 1990 NHL draft, the Philadelphia Flyers are proud to select, from Kladno, Czechoslovakia...(what's his name again???)....Jahromer Jagger.
This is part of it. Take Jagr over Ricci, take Forsberg the next year and keep him and all the other assets they gave up for Lindros. They would have been awesome.
 

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
78,784
86,115
Nova Scotia
2007 draft...trade to move up in the 2nd round to select a Dman. We select Kevin Marshall who plays 10 games with the Flyers before being traded for Matt Ford.

The next Dman selected after Marshall just 2 picks later was PK Subban.
 

BillDineen

Former Flyer / Extinct Dinosaur Advisor
Aug 9, 2009
9,369
8,101
Always wished we had acquire Gilmour instead of Bullard
 

JayB

Registered User
May 30, 2012
551
27
What if we would have taken Zadorov instead of Morin. We would not need to watch Hägg at third pair.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->