The Premature 2020 Expansion Thread

Mcnotloilersfan

I'm here, I'm bored
Jul 11, 2010
11,071
5,112
Niagara
The Early Seattle Expansion Discussion.

With Seattle one vote away from a 2020 expansion, its never too early to start discussing Edmonton's position. Edmonton went into the previous expansion draft in one of the best situations. This time around, there are going to be some very difficult decisions. Assuming the same expansion rules are in place, here’s what we should consider.

Who Is Exempt:
Bouchard
Yamamoto
McLeod
Benson
2019+2020 picks (very important to hang on to).

Troublesome Contracts: Chiarelli has no choice here. For the sake of the team, he needs to find a way to move both of the dmen here. Any of these players that are not moved, will be forced onto our protection list.

Lucic
Sekera
Russell

Interesting to note that if this gets pushed back to 2021, we gain having Sekera and Russell off the books, while potentially having to expose Bouchard and Yama if they play Pro past the 9 game mark this season.
Assuming the worst, that Chiarelli can’t move any of those contracts, here is what a couple different scenarios look like. All of these have Talbot in place for now as the #1G, assuming a new contract is signed.

Protect 7F, 3D, 1G

Protected:
McDavid
Draisaitl
Lucic
RNH
Puljujarvi
Khaira
Strome
Russell
Sekera
Larsson
Talbot

Key Players Exposed: Nurse, Klefbom, Bear

Protect 8 Skaters, 1 G

McDavid
Draisaitl
Lucic
Russell
Sekera
Nurse
Klefbom
Larsson

Key Players Exposed: RNH, Puljujarvi, Khaira, Strome, Bear

Sekera and Russel are going to be incredibly difficult to trade. Any team who makes a deal for them is going to have to put them on their protected rosters. Edmonton might be forced into a situation of trading a 1st round pick to Seattle, to not poach one of our key assets. Maybe as part of the deal, they will take one of those contracts as well.

Thoughts?
 

Trafalgar Sadge Law

Registered User
Nov 8, 2007
11,477
6,874
Just pull a Chicago and have Sekera develop a "career threatening rash", then have Kris Russell busted for weed or something. Boom. Problem solved.
 

stratedge

My relationship with the Oilers is abusive.
Jul 25, 2007
7,102
1,462
Calgary, AB
The bad players taking up valuable spots on that list just go to show you, you can't fully appreciate how stupid Chia's contracts are up front. They get stupider and stupider with time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McFlash97

Hopelesslucicfan

Larsson fanclub 2016
Mar 14, 2009
8,156
2,124
Edmonton
Yeah, I was kind of worried about this potential draft. Were basically guaranteed to lose a very good (by our standards) forward, and one of our few top 4 dmen.
 

voxel

Testicle Terrorist
Feb 14, 2007
19,967
4,382
Florida
A premature ejaculation thread. We can always ask Lucic, Sekera, Russell to waive their NTC/NMC clauses. Doubt Seattle will take them. We'll just lose Khaira or something like that... unless we suddenly become a powerhouse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TB12

Spawn

Something in the water
Feb 20, 2006
43,627
15,057
Edmonton
According to capfriendly, Sekera's NMC becomes a limited NTC after this season. He shouldn't be a concern for a 2020 expansion.

Russell would have one year left at 4M and while he still would have a NMC, he needs to provide a list of 15 teams he'd be willing to accept a trade to. I think either a buyout or a trade would occur before the Oilers would protect him.

Lucic is the most difficult to deal with. Realistically he's going to be protected. There's an outside chance that we could get him to waive it for the expansion as Seattle might be a pretty attractive place for him to play out the rest of his career. Really close to home and family, but not right in the spotlight of Vancouver. And I don't imagine things are going to get better for him in Edmonton unfortunately. He might relish the chance to leave. But that could also just be wishful thinking.
 
Last edited:

ThreeOfAPerfectPair

Registered User
Oct 26, 2017
7,142
8,941
Edmonton
Who Is Exempt:
Bouchard
Yamamoto
McLeod
Benson
2019+2020 picks (very important to hang on to).

EDIT: Disregard this post. Players going into their 3rd season are exempt.


* All first- and second-year professionals, as well as all unsigned draft choices, will be exempt from selection (and will not be counted toward their club's applicable protection limits).

2018-19
2019-20
Expansion Year

Yams and Bouchard will be available if they play this season.
 
Last edited:

voxel

Testicle Terrorist
Feb 14, 2007
19,967
4,382
Florida

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
35,940
16,328
we will get multiple players to waive their NMCs. I thought that wouldn't happen to exposed teams last expansion, but lots of players waived when it was a sure thing that they wouldn't be picked. No one's picking an injured Sekera. With Lucic it depends on his play, but no one would pick him if he's bad, and if he's a short contract anyway.

Mostly though, I'm not worried. We might have to make a side deal with Seattle, which sucks, but it's better than exposing someone like Nurse, Bear, or even a key role player like Strome. People thought that Vegas would be snagging guys like Vatanen, but that turned out to be BS. We also will not give up major pieces, but might have to give a good pick or prospect to buy our way out of it. Just pay the toll and move on.
 

Mcnotloilersfan

I'm here, I'm bored
Jul 11, 2010
11,071
5,112
Niagara
* All first- and second-year professionals, as well as all unsigned draft choices, will be exempt from selection (and will not be counted toward their club's applicable protection limits).

2018-19
2019-20
Expansion Year

Yams and Bouchard will be available if they play this season.


Players going into their 3rd season are exempt.

Connor and Nurse played 2 seasons and were exempt. Draisaitl played 2 full seasons, plus his 39 game stint the season before, so he was not exempt. Had he only played 9 games or fewer that season, he would have also been exempt.

Bouchard and Yama can play all of this year and next season. They will be exempt if the draft happens in 2020
 

Skolman

Registered User
Feb 16, 2018
9,385
7,889
It would be amazing if Lucic would waive.

Give them a 2nd round pick + decent prospect to take Lucic.
 

nexttothemoon

and again...
Jan 30, 2010
29,498
16,689
Northern AB
Sekera will be 90 years old with no legs by the time that expansion draft rolls around... he'll be about as appealing to Seattle as watching Roseanne and Rosie O'Donnell doing a 2 girls 1 cup sequel.

Of course he'll waive any NMC.
 

ThreeOfAPerfectPair

Registered User
Oct 26, 2017
7,142
8,941
Edmonton
Pretty sure Mrs. Lucic would prefer Seattle over Edmonton.

When is the lockout/compliance buy-out year supposed to happen? 2020-21? Seattle probably wants to enter the league after that's settled...
 
Last edited:

Mr Sakich

Registered User
Mar 8, 2002
9,643
1,284
Motel 35
vimeo.com
One glimmer of hope is that there is a good possibility that the threat of a lockout season may pushed the expansion to 21. We lose russel and Sekera nmc.

We can also hope for a buyout opportunity in the new cba like we had the last time. This would take care of lucic
 

ConnorMcMullet

#12 Colby Cave
Jun 10, 2017
10,293
18,030
If Lucic, Sekera, and Russell waive their NMC we will be fine.

I suspect they will, since there is next to no chance they will be picked, and they wouldn't want the team losing a valuable player.
 

Fourier

Registered User
Dec 29, 2006
25,576
19,847
Waterloo Ontario
* All first- and second-year professionals, as well as all unsigned draft choices, will be exempt from selection (and will not be counted toward their club's applicable protection limits).

2018-19
2019-20
Expansion Year

Yams and Bouchard will be available if they play this season.
Both Yamamoto and Bouchard would still be exempt just as McDavid was in the last expansion draft.

The Oilers are actually in pretty decent shape for this draft. They can go 7-3

Forwards
McDavid
Draisiatl
Nuge
Puljujarvi
Lucic
Khaira
Strome/Rattie?

Defense
Larsson
Klefbom
Nurse

Buyout or trade Russell if he does not waive.

My guess is that Lucic would waive if asked to do so. Seattle is very close to home and the success that Vegas had will likely take some of the concern about going to an expansion team off the table. I also doubt Seattle would take his contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThreeOfAPerfectPair

Mcnotloilersfan

I'm here, I'm bored
Jul 11, 2010
11,071
5,112
Niagara
Both Yamamoto and Bouchard would still be exempt just as McDavid was in the last expansion draft.

The Oilers are actually in pretty decent shape for this draft. They can go 7-3

Forwards
McDavid
Draisiatl
Nuge
Puljujarvi
Lucic
Khaira
Strome/Rattie?

Defense
Larsson
Klefbom
Nurse

Buyout or trade Russell if he does not waive.

My guess is that Lucic would waive if asked to do so. Seattle is very close to home and the success that Vegas had will likely take some of the concern about going to an expansion team off the table. I also doubt Seattle would take his contract.

There is still Sekera to deal with.
 

Mcnotloilersfan

I'm here, I'm bored
Jul 11, 2010
11,071
5,112
Niagara
Russell does but not Sekera.

Thanks, this makes me feel much better. I could honestly see Russell being fine with waiving his NMC in that case. Very likely that we would lose someone like Bear or Khaira in that situation anyway and he would recognize that.
 

Mcnotloilersfan

I'm here, I'm bored
Jul 11, 2010
11,071
5,112
Niagara
Pretty sure Mrs. Lucic would prefer Seattle over Edmonton.

When is the lockout/compliance buy-out year supposed to happen? 2020-21? Seattle probably wants to enter the league after that's settled...

If I'm Seattle, I want to enter the league before Compliance buyouts happen. Teams will be able to protect more talented players if they can do compliance buyouts. Imagine if we could buyout Lucic and Russell. We'd barely feel the expansion draft hit us.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad