SotasicA
Registered User
- Aug 25, 2014
- 8,489
- 6,404
Possibly. It's problematic for both Mario and Wayne that there was a time when they were both ahead of their peers, but neither clearly better than the other. There were a few years with no definitive #1 player. However Gretzky solidified his superiority to other superstars of his generation prior to Mario, and Mario then beat Gretzky enough times to become the next generational talent, a few years ahead of schedule (ie. their age difference is only like 5 years).I guess if we're doing super strict definitions, I guess Lemieux wasn't generational either because of Gretzky????
But it would be laughable to claim Malkin is the single best player of his generation. He is an elite superstar, but he is not a level above. Crosby scored 120pts as a 19-year-old. He is a clear cut above others, in talent. Malkin is in that next group. Right now looking like McDavid has already surpassed him, and on the brink (maybe a Cup short, since it is a team sport after all) of becoming the next bonafide generational player. Maybe only the 4th since Bobby Orr. 10 years per one generational talent.