I think 90% of fans can understand that there's something wrong when they play Tampa Bay in the playoffs and Tampa has $102 million of NHL payroll on their roster.
Also, no one knows what the owners or players want. There's obviously a contingent of owners or players that are happy with the current arrangement, but that doesn't mean everyone is.
If someone has the rules wrong, there's nothing wrong with correcting them, and there's nothing wrong with discussing any unintended consequences you think will come from a reform of LTIR. This isn't about any specific team, or at least it doesn't need to be. Nearly 1/3 of the league is above the salary cap, and it's probably closer to half the league if you count the full AAV of retained-salary players.
We have a pretty good idea what owners and players want, because they’ve had years to change how contracts work, and LTIR works and they’ve evidently either not thought of it as a problem, or they don’t think it’s enough of a problem that any downsides to changes made wouldn’t be worse.
LTIR is about the regular season. 90-100% of teams’ year. Icing as competitive a roster as possible to even make the playoffs, and get home ice for themselves and their fans.
Factor in how most LTIR placements don’t actually return for the playoffs and or aren’t significant players near Kucherovs level, and it probably doesn’t justify in league people’s minds making changes that would affect 100% of teams all the time.
the last closest example was Patrick Kane
several years ago, and that team wasn’t exactly world beaters. They added THREE “great” players and went something like 12-8-3
you have to be pretty “lucky” that the timing works out relative to the season and severity of the injuries (which no player would ever consider lucky in the first place) which doesn’t happen often.
now again consider how much luck good and bad plays into every teams season. Some teams (including probably the bolts anyway) lose players after the deadline and even just before the round starts. That’s both bad luck for them, and good luck for the other team. That’s an “advantage” for them. If you’re point is spending difference, now they’re X-more millions of dollars heavier in the playoffs round. Shit happens. I wouldn’t be surprised if many around the league view this as essentially the same given the degree of luck
I’d bet anything the scale of “outrage” would shift up or down any instance given the respective teams quality to begin with. A team that’s lower seed quality, maybe bubble, has made some bad decisions in the past because they can’t see the future. They’ve got some cap recapture or retained or a massively overpaid bottom six guy, yet by some miracle has been competitive and makes the playoffs. Not stacked by any means, and lost a key guy before the deadline, they should be hamstrung? The league is all about parity, and these teams have just as much potential to need the current LTIR (and still would need lucky timing to benefit as Tampa is, but would the league complain? Probably not. More talent = more entertainment)
You’d pretty much have to fundamentally alter finances and how contracts work, and I’m not smart enough to get into all that but I assume it would have impacts on the league well outside this issue or otherwise would lose on parties interest