LetsGOJackets!!
Registered User
I normally barely drink anything... don't know why I chose to be a hero last night... felt it all day
They're interested in dumping Jankowski or Bennett and getting a reclamation project back, so they can go f*** themselves.I have read that Calgary has expressed interest. Who knows?
Probably not for Boeser. 1)if Anderson takes his qualifying offer, would be stupid to trade Boeser for potentially 1 year of Anderson. 2)if he signs a contract, it would be too much for Vancouver. From what the fans say, the point of trading Boeser would be to clear some cap space(Markstrom and Toffoli are free agents they want to keep). 3)I think only way is if Columbus takes a cap dump (Myers, Erickson, Sutter, not sure who else they have but none of those interests me).I’m wondering if there’s a deal to be made with either Calgary or Vancouver around Gaudreau or Boeser for Anderson
Sabres fan just curious of what Columbus fans would be looking for in return in a potential Anderson trade.
Also inquiring as to the availability of Korpisalo as well. Could he be dealt?
looking more for organizational perspective as opposed to fan perspective (those can obviously vary quite greatly).
Sabres fan just curious of what Columbus fans would be looking for in return in a potential Anderson trade.
Also inquiring as to the availability of Korpisalo as well. Could he be dealt?
looking more for organizational perspective as opposed to fan perspective (those can obviously vary quite greatly).
Thirty since late October, at last count.I think we are at 20+ Josh Anderson trade threads on the main board.
Thirty since late October, at last count.
Also, I'm not seeing the benefit in going for "top-6 center prospects" since we've already got two good ones and have one spot to fill. Or "project centers", since we already have Wennberg and Grigorenko.
I love that you are tracking the offers. I used to argue with Oilers fans who thought they could give us players we didn’t need for Anderson, but I got bored of that.
You can never have too many top 6 center prospects. We could let a kid have a full season in Cleveland or another year in whatever league he is in. Go with the old Detroit model and let a kid develop longer. And a prospect might be especially valuable now — he won’t have to be exposed to Seattle or could be traded for a valuable forward that another team can’t protect.
If they played in NHL/AHL in 2018-19 or earlier they aren't exempt. Mittelstadt is a good example of that.
In any case, I don't think that matters much. If we acquire Mittelstadt and Seattle then plucks him from us, that's not bad value for us. It means we aren't losing any regulars.
I am thinking of Cozens as the center prospect. But maybe I am being greedy. And I realize it might be Korpi + Anderson for Cozens and maybe they would want us to add.
Anderson just got added to the camp roster, whatever that means.
Again, I said I am being greedy. I am not looking for fair value. I am looking at what the Jackets need. The Jackets have the sought after player. If the trade doesn’t make the Jackets better, it doesn’t happen.
Unless he and his agent insist on being paid more than the CBJ are willing to pay.
If it were only that easy. We can't force him to accept a salary. I want nothing to do with a Nylander situation like what happened in Toronto. There have been bad negotiations with him once already. Jarmo already pulled the leverage card. Twice will be a disaster. If it gets to that point he won't be here any longer.Then we keep him, bet that he plays well next year looking for his next contract, and trade him at the deadline for the best offer from a western conference team.
If it were only that easy. We can't force him to accept a salary. I want nothing to do with a Nylander situation like what happened in Toronto. There have been bad negotiations with him once already. Jarmo already pulled the leverage card. Twice will be a disaster. If it gets to that point he won't be here any longer.
Sometimes if 2 partners want different things it is best they go separate ways. It won't be successful partnership if both sides aren't happy. He was already unhappy he didn't get want he wanted the first time.It all has the vibe of wanting to dump your partner because you're afraid they'll dump you.
Then we keep him, bet that he plays well next year looking for his next contract, and trade him at the deadline for the best offer from a western conference team.
I’m wondering if there’s a deal to be made with either Calgary or Vancouver around Gaudreau or Boeser for Anderson
It all has the vibe of wanting to dump your partner because you're afraid they'll dump you.
If it were only that easy. We can't force him to accept a salary. I want nothing to do with a Nylander situation like what happened in Toronto. There have been bad negotiations with him once already. Jarmo already pulled the leverage card. Twice will be a disaster. If it gets to that point he won't be here any longer.
I get the impression that Kekalainen does that mostly with second contracts, and that afterwards he's all "you have proven your worth, have all the moneys".These are the situations I don't trust Jarmo. Seems like we need someone with hands of a surgeon and we have hands of stone Jarmo who wants to play hardball.
I hope I'm wrong, well first I hope Anderson recovers and is the player we saw in the past, then I hope we get him signed long-term.
Too many of these deals where Jarmo seems too interested in winning a negotiation. At the same time Jarmo is all too eager to pass out 3-4 year deals with bottom 6 forwards...