The Hockey News - Top 50 players

koyvoo

Registered User
Nov 8, 2014
17,253
17,030
02CFD8E7-168F-4B56-87A4-F04A4AD69F28.jpeg

2A178F8F-9FA0-4419-A472-FAEA99C4CCC0.jpeg
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
32,115
22,098
Interesting that 33 of 50 (quick count) didn't even make it to playoffs or past first round of playoffs.
 

Love

Registered User
Feb 29, 2012
15,014
12,252
Barkov, ROR, Vasilevskiy, Bishop, Stone, and Burns too high. Kane, Malkin, and Marchand way too low.

I don't know how one could possibly take Stone over Malkin and Marchand. Just think about how bad that is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cats2TheCup

Turin

Registered User
Feb 27, 2018
22,073
25,490
Malkin has one down year (still over a ppg) after a 98 point season following back to back Cups and he drops to 25. Unbelievable.
 

joe dirte

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
9,430
3,559
Its mostly not bad but there are a few things that stick way out.

O rielly way too high.
Pastrnak too high
Draisaitl way too high
Carey price shouldnt even be on the list given recent seasons.
Malkin wayyyyy too low
John gibson, giroux, and eichel way too low

I struggle with where to put serbob.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Binister

Just Linda

Registered User
Feb 24, 2018
6,649
6,533
I have to wonder what the background of THN reporters are sometimes. It seems to be slipping more and more, I love their podcast but I don't see anyone on their team ever reaching the ability of some of the reporters who've gone through there.

Legit, anyone here know if anyone on their staff has a legit hockey background? Ken and Ryan (blanking on last names) seems to at least have a lot of connections that get them interviews for sure but yeah, they seem to have no inside sources and are 2-3 days behind posting anything about events.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->