Hawkaholic
Registered User
Luckily for them, they only have to play against him for 8mins a game.Ask any player in the NHL who they hate to play against and I'd bet Reaves name would often come up.
Luckily for them, they only have to play against him for 8mins a game.Ask any player in the NHL who they hate to play against and I'd bet Reaves name would often come up.
I’ll bet good players love playing against him.Ask any player in the NHL who they hate to play against and I'd bet Reaves name would often come up.
He is a punk and $ 2.25 M per season is a tad high but I think McPhee has proven that he knows what he's doing. N'est pas?
People used the same argument to defend Q stupidity. Appeal to authority doesn’t do much for me.
That’s a great deal for CBJ. Not sure why Hawks were so quick to give up on him.
He have enough guys that can take Duke's role (Ejdsell, Kunitz, Kahun). Didn't make sense keep him.
He would have gone on waivers and he wouldn’t have cleared.I wouldn't have minded if Duclair was given more time in RFD if necessary. I just find it difficult to give up so easily on a kid with his skill, when he can be re-signed for league minimum.
He would have gone on waivers and he wouldn’t have cleared.
Exactly. Which is why Duclair, by the time the all star break hits, will be in the press box more often than not.It will be interesting to see if Duclair can reach his potential with better coaching. One thing certain, Torts will not tolerate a one-dimensional floater.
why did stan ever trade for duclair to begin with?
Panik was making like 2.25 mil right? Not much of a cap hit to save. But I guess that makes sense. I would have rather had just kept him and hoped he turned it around again. 1.5 million in cap savings doesn't seem like much to me when you arent up against it.