Bad Goalie
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2014
- 20,076
- 8,728
I'll venture into it for you, then.
There were 7 LHD's and only 5 RHD's in camp. Travis is fairly adamant about defencemen not playing on their "off" side so Chatfield and Rafferty would've had to have been rather bad to get cut. That left Juolevi, Brisebois and Sautner in the real battle and the time off helped Olli who was reportedly moving much better and obviously has more innate potential than the other two.
Lind isn't there from a skating and physical standpoint. Bailey is much faster and can better withstand the physicality of NHL game action. But Lind, still three months shy of turning 22, is progressing and already has better hockey sense and puck distribution skills than Bailey does at age 25 with five pro seasons under his belt. In the last three scrimmages Lind was doing better than Bailey in that less physical environment.
Canucks are deep with NHLers at forward but thin at defence. Two or more blueline injuries could create a real problem.
Only meant my list of 6 were rolls of the dice. None are must keep over any of the others. Any one or two being there vs not being there wouldn't have cause me any shock either way. This had nothing to do with depth charts. Note I had a goalie, a forward, and a D-man in one group and 3 M-men in the other. I wasn't even comparing them to one another. I was simply voicing my opinion as to the idea I don't see any of them as serious pieces at this time and if the team is going to have to lean hard on them, it's not likely to fare well as a result.
Last edited: