darko
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2009
- 70,267
- 7,792
Has to be Houston
Don't see how Houston fits him in.
Anderson's contract is an issue. Also bringing back Capela is a must.
Has to be Houston
LeBron is an opportunist. Great players have their time to shine and some win championships and some don't. If Lebron moves on again it will just further cement the fact that as an individual he was great but he didn't build anything like the greats before him. LeBron could play until he is 45 and have every record in the book and even invent more but it won't change the fact that the greats before him did more with less. The more GS wins the more impact it has on LeBrons legacy because at this stage in their careers the most dominant players where playing for the most dominant teams, which Cleveland never was.This is so absurd. I'm not saying it's something that doesn't get talked about, but the fact that there's even a debate about "Yeah, he can win a bunch of championships if he goes to team X, but it won't be rewarding" is just insane. How has it gotten to the point where people don't even value winning the NBA Championship if it isn't done in a certain way?
No sane person doesn't think he's the best ever, and if he goes to LA and wins 5 more Championships by himself, the people that think Jordan is better because he was 6-0 in the Finals or whatever the argument is would still never change their opinion. His legacy is set either way, just go to a place that will help you win more Championships, unless he values something else more.
Lavar is possibly the only man who could have beat MJ 1 on 1 in his prime... who better to learn from?He's joining the Lakers so Lavar Ball can show him how to play better.
I thought the Sixers had a great shot before the Colangelo thing, but with that it's hard to see him going there now.
I went with the Lakers since it's a high profile location that can attract other free agents, they've started a decent rebuild, and I'm pretty sure LeBron has a house in SoCal.
Lavar is possibly the only man who could have beat MJ 1 on 1 in his prime... who better to learn from?
Ball, Ingram, Kuzma, Randle are a better group than the Cavs he just carried to the finals. That, plus lifestyle and business opportunities, the Lakers just seem like the best fit IMO.
Rockets and Spurs are two other potential suitors. Close friends on both teams, and they’re already very good without LeBron.
I would never watch basketball again.Lebron james to golden state warriors would be awesome
No chance LeBron goes to Los Angeles and it isn't to play for the Lakers.Honestly I could see him going to the Clippers. Maybe it's just me but if they can get a PG and resign Bradley and let West find a C that he likes.
I’d rather go to a team with the person who built the Warriors and has actually been to the playoffs recently over a team that does have some promising players but is still young.No chance LeBron goes to Los Angeles and it isn't to play for the Lakers.
I mean, I wouldn't exactly give Jerry West all the credit for building the Warriors. Curry was already in tow when he got there, and they drafted Klay Thompson a month after hiring West.I’d rather go to a team with the person who built the Warriors and has actually been to the playoffs recently over a team that does have some promising players but is still young.
I’d rather go to a team with the person who built the Warriors and has actually been to the playoffs recently over a team that does have some promising players but is still young.
If Lebron goes to LA how long until he gets Walton fired and inserts someone who he can control as HC?
Honestly I could see him going to the Clippers. Maybe it's just me but if they can get a PG and resign Bradley and let West find a C that he likes.
If Lebron goes to LA how long until he gets Walton fired and inserts someone who he can control as HC?
He's not going to play with those young players if he goes to the Lakers. It'll likely be similar to the Cavs return where he knows beforehand they're going to move some of them out.
Nice circular logic.LeBron is an opportunist. Great players have their time to shine and some win championships and some don't. If Lebron moves on again it will just further cement the fact that as an individual he was great but he didn't build anything like the greats before him. LeBron could play until he is 45 and have every record in the book and even invent more but it won't change the fact that the greats before him did more with less. The more GS wins the more impact it has on LeBrons legacy because at this stage in their careers the most dominant players where playing for the most dominant teams, which Cleveland never was.
Ingram, or more likely Lonzo would be tarred for a K-Love type of piece. Thing is, if he joins the Lakers he may not win or make the finals right away, but they have quite the young core, he's never been surrounded by that many good young players.
If LeBron comes to the Lakers, the one thing I'm certain of is that Lonzo Ball will not be a Laker. I believe LeBron will make it a stipulation that the Lakers move him if he signs there. No need to deal with the circus that is LaVar Ball.lonzo isn't going anywhere. and they'd be extremely stupid to move him anyways
like i said, if ingram can keep making strides like he did last season he'll be a star pretty soon. kuzma is on the fast track to star status already
lebron would be that vet they need to put them over the top