For the purposes of this project I compute a "score" for every draft-eligible player. This number doesn't mean anything in and of itself, it's just something I have to do so that I can rank the players. Needless to say, there are plenty of examples where two players are barely separate and there is no meaningful difference between the two.
Today, I wanted to look at the opposite situation, that is, the widest "gaps" in my data-set. I wanted to see where there was the widest separation between best-player statistically and 2nd best player, statistically. Here is where the widest gaps lie from 2006-2017:
draftyear | Best Player | draftpos | 2nd Best Player | draftpos | Gap |
2017 | Elias Pettersson | 5 | Nick Suzuki | 13 | 1.10 |
2010 | Mikael Granlund | 9 | Taylor Hall | 1 | 0.61 |
2009 | Victor Hedman | 2 | John Tavares | 1 | 0.60 |
2015 | Connor McDavid | 1 | Jack Eichel | 2 | 0.42 |
2012 | Tomas Hertl | 17 | Nail Yakupov | 1 | 0.33 |
2014 | William Nylander | 8 | David Pastrnak | 25 | 0.28 |
2007 | Patrick Kane | 1 | Sam Gagner | 6 | 0.27 |
2008 | Steven Stamkos | 1 | Zach Bogosian | 3 | 0.26 |
2013 | Aleksander Barkov | 2 | Elias Lindholm | 5 | 0.21 |
2006 | Nicklas Backstrom | 4 | Derick Brassard | 6 | 0.08 |
2011 | Ryan Strome | 5 | Joel Armia | 16 | 0.03 |
2016 | Patrik Laine | 2 | Auston Matthews | 1 | 0.01 |
[TBODY]
[/TBODY]
Now, obviously, this is far from perfect, and it was never designed to be. There are some pretty clear cases where the scouts got it right, as they should, since they are paid a lot of money to do so.
But, that 2017 draft right now is looking to be the biggest scouting fail in the recent history, where the
most clear-cut #1 player statistically fell all the way to 5 due to his body type. There is no other example in my data where there was even close to as wide a gap between #1 and #2
statistically where the #1 player fell like that. The 2010 draft saw Granlund fall all the way to 9 but Hall and Seguin were at least closer to him than the 2nd tier in 2017 (where Hischier and Suzuki were esssentially tied.)