Discussion in 'International Tournaments' started by AGraveOne, Sep 14, 2004.
just had to express that.
That's why the camera is so clean...
Seriously. How many times were they in an entirely other zone of the rink when the play was continuing? There were times were I thought Kiprusoff had the puck and its already out of the zone and times where there's a pass back to the point and I'm stuck looking at Niedermayer standing still because the puck ended up going into the corner.
Anticipating the play is a worthy goal, but following the puck accurately is much more helpful.
Once all the games are in HD we won't have to worry about this
I watched on CBC, looked fine to me.
Yes the cameramen suck, I have a hard time seeing the puck...I think they need to bring back the glowing puck.
Great thread. It would help if the poster mentioned what broadcast they watched.
Well that explains it.
Hah, that's nothing. If you want the real deal, check out a game broadcasted from Russia. The cameramen probably drinks 3-4 bottles of Vodka for breakfast.
Myabe they should have used ESPN 8 the Oc............uh, nevermind just forget it.
:lol I was wondering what you were talking about. The angles were fine for me. You should write them and let them know though.
Man, the ESPN crew did ok with angles (mostly) but they often trailed the puck by a second...which on a shot from high in the zone you get to the goalie after the puck and rebound...
it was tough at times.
Separate names with a comma.