I think after watching the defense in the last two games Demko and Markstrom have developed season ending injuries.
Great loss.
Great loss.
As much as I'm on the tank, nobody wants to see a rookie thrown to the wolves like that.
As much as I'm on the tank, nobody wants to see a rookie thrown to the wolves like that.
I feel bad for Dipietro, but if he's the sacrificial lamb that will get Benning fired then so be it. Though I'm smart enough to know it won't be. And yes, I do know that there will be people defying logic once again and coming up with some way to praise Benning for this.
Honestly, I don't even know how you spin a positive angle on this.I feel bad for Dipietro, but if he's the sacrificial lamb that will get Benning fired then so be it. Though I'm smart enough to know it won't be. And yes, I do know that there will be people defying logic once again and coming up with some way to praise Benning for this.
I'm puzzled by the complaints about the situation in goal and DiPietro playing. I could understand it in the game-day thread, but not here. Why would tank supporters want management to give up an asset in order to acquire a temporary solution in goal that might mean another point or two for the Canucks? That makes no sense.
What's the cost of DiPietro starting this game and perhaps one or two more with respect to his development? Probably no cost at all. What's the cost in relation to team performance? Perhaps it costs a point or two in the standings. That's not a bad thing. It's the opposite.
Here's a thought: Maybe the people in this thread have opinions slightly more sophisticated than simply: TEAM LOSE IS GOOD.I'm puzzled by the complaints about the situation in goal and DiPietro playing. I could understand it in the game-day thread, but not here. Why would tank supporters want management to give up an asset in order to acquire a temporary solution in goal that might mean another point or two for the Canucks? That makes no sense.
What's the cost of DiPietro starting this game and perhaps one or two more with respect to his development? Probably no cost at all. What's the cost in relation to team performance? Perhaps it costs a point or two in the standings. That's not a bad thing. It's the opposite.
I'm puzzled by the complaints about the situation in goal and DiPietro playing. I could understand it in the game-day thread, but not here. Why would tank supporters want management to give up an asset in order to acquire a temporary solution in goal that might mean another point or two for the Canucks? That makes no sense.
What's the cost of DiPietro starting this game and perhaps one or two more with respect to his development? Probably no cost at all. What's the cost in relation to team performance? Perhaps it costs a point or two in the standings. That's not a bad thing. It's the opposite.
Here's a thought: Maybe the people in this thread have opinions slightly more sophisticated than simply: TEAM LOSE IS GOOD.
It is preferable to NOT have to risk your blue chipper to achieve said objective.
But.
If the cost of public outrage against these fake Canuck managers is the ruination of the prospect named Michael DiPietro, then so be it.
Winter is coming.
You're confusing sophistication with inconsistency and lack of logic.
There is a lot of nuance to people who are pro-tank. You're also lumping a large group of people into having exactly the same belief. You don't even get that in any walk of life, let alone pro-tank fandom.
Minnesota is up 3 - 1 on Philadelphia after 20. PHI is 8-1-1 L10.
St. Louis and Dallas are about to establish more separation on Vancouver
EDIT: Seguin ices it for Dallas and we're 1-for-3 on the night. Philadelphia has scored to make it 3 - 2. STL is destroying NJD 6 - 1
EDIT 2: Philadelphia ties it. For the tank, Minnesota must take points here