World Cup: the best hockey ever 1987 Canada vs USSR

Yakushev72

Registered User
Dec 27, 2010
4,550
372
The best players were at most Canada Cups, though I can see that there are exceptions in the cases of 1976 and 1991. That is the primary consideration. Yakushev72's opinion of on the other elements is quite low on the list, though I would enjoy seeing the list of "best on best tournaments that Yakushev72 deems fair and balanced". Perhaps a new Fox News Cup is in order. The USSR's most significant single hockey achievement is winning the 1981 Canada Cup in dominating fashion. There was something to play for in the case of each participant. This isn't the joke 2016 World Cup or the majority of IIHf world championship tournaments.

While it had its flaws, the closest to "Yakushev 72's best on best hits" was the 8-game, home and home, 1972 series between Canada and the Soviets. It had all the elements of fairness and equal competition, in addition to having the best available talent. Probably the next best are the Olympics, where Russia has not been competitive since the demise of the Soviet Union.
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
18,042
12,662
While it had its flaws, the closest to "Yakushev 72's best on best hits" was the 8-game, home and home, 1972 series between Canada and the Soviets. It had all the elements of fairness and equal competition, in addition to having the best available talent. Probably the next best are the Olympics, where Russia has not been competitive since the demise of the Soviet Union.

I wouldn't include the Summit Series or most editions of the Olympics but at least your list is interesting to see.
 

RED ARMY EAST

Registered User
Feb 14, 2010
1,928
286
Freddy Beach,N.B.Canada
While it had its flaws, the closest to "Yakushev 72's best on best hits" was the 8-game, home and home, 1972 series between Canada and the Soviets. It had all the elements of fairness and equal competition, in addition to having the best available talent. Probably the next best are the Olympics, where Russia has not been competitive since the demise of the Soviet Union.
The 72 is Iconic, but it wasn't the best team from a Canadian perspective. No WHA participation, which meant, example no Bobby Hull, the most feared shooter arguably in the world. Probably would have included a few other stars, Gordie Howe? Bobby Orr didn't participate etc.
 

member 305909

Guest
Both of those teams would get their asses kicked today as in any other sport. Competition has become so much harder.
 

Yakushev72

Registered User
Dec 27, 2010
4,550
372
The 72 is Iconic, but it wasn't the best team from a Canadian perspective. No WHA participation, which meant, example no Bobby Hull, the most feared shooter arguably in the world. Probably would have included a few other stars, Gordie Howe? Bobby Orr didn't participate etc.
The 72 is Iconic, but it wasn't the best team from a Canadian perspective. No WHA participation, which meant, example no Bobby Hull, the most feared shooter arguably in the world. Probably would have included a few other stars, Gordie Howe? Bobby Orr didn't participate etc.

Orr was injured, so he couldn't have participated under any circumstances. Hull was the only player from the WHA who would have made a difference in 1972. The Canadian brass never dreamt that he would have been needed to beat a bunch of amateurs!

The Soviets were missing their best forward and scorer, Anatoli Firsov, who was also injured.
 

RED ARMY EAST

Registered User
Feb 14, 2010
1,928
286
Freddy Beach,N.B.Canada
Yes ORR was injured, but he also was the best player in Canada, perhaps the World at that time, I think most would agree, certainly from a NA perspective. He always wanted to play the Soviets and did get to to play them in the 1976 Canada Cup (MVP). 72 was also an exhibition series, not a tournament, that became much, much more.
Yakushev 72, as for Firsov, I am not familiar with him. Did he play in the 1976 Canada Cup?
 

MaxV

Registered User
Nov 6, 2006
4,888
590
New York, NY
The 72 is Iconic, but it wasn't the best team from a Canadian perspective. No WHA participation, which meant, example no Bobby Hull, the most feared shooter arguably in the world. Probably would have included a few other stars, Gordie Howe? Bobby Orr didn't participate etc.

Orr definitely, but bringing up Hull is a bit iffy in this discussion.

He played the same position as Paul Henderson.

We’ve covered this topic on this board about a million times I think.

There are people on this board that seem to think that Henderson was a slam dunk selection whether WHA players were available or not ... yeeeeah, I don’t know.
 

MaxV

Registered User
Nov 6, 2006
4,888
590
New York, NY
Neither team was at their best throughout the series in all honesty.

Canada was missing Orr, WHA guys and also players in the series who left to prepare for season (boy, do they regret that).

Soviet coach, Bobrov, also tinkered with the lineup constantly, even when Soviets were winning. I think he promised certain players that they would get to play before the tournament and didn’t want to break his word. I’m certain that was the case with old man Starshinov and Martinyuk, as Bobrov coached both at Spartak. Solodukhin and the “kids line” got their turns also. Soviets also had injury issues (I can get into the reasoning, but I don’t want to open that can of worms) throughout the tournament.

Honestly, I’m not surprised that Soviets lost the last 3 games with the likes of Volchkov, Mishakov, Bodunov, Shatalov and Lebedev.
 

JackSlater

Registered User
Apr 27, 2010
18,042
12,662
Orr was injured, so he couldn't have participated under any circumstances. Hull was the only player from the WHA who would have made a difference in 1972. The Canadian brass never dreamt that he would have been needed to beat a bunch of amateurs!

The Soviets were missing their best forward and scorer, Anatoli Firsov, who was also injured.

Was Firsov injured, or was his situation more political, as in the case of Hull?
 

MaxV

Registered User
Nov 6, 2006
4,888
590
New York, NY
Was Firsov injured, or was his situation more political, as in the case of Hull?

We will never know.

It sucks that he wasn’t there, not just for USSR team (maybe they would have lost anyway), but for his legacy.

In HHOF 2019 thread his name gets brought up, but I think there is NO WAY he has a chance. Guys like Mikhailov and Maltsev have a far better chance.
 

Peiskos

Registered User
Jan 4, 2018
3,665
3,614
I wasn't alive during this series but I've seen highlights. Have to give respect to the Soviets, this was a Canadian team with Gretzky, Lemieux, Messier, Gilmour, Gartner, Hawerchuk, Anderson, Coffey, Bourque among many more, for the scores to have been so close is really a testament to just how good the Soviets were, I would say the closest thing to near equals at the time.
 

Yakushev72

Registered User
Dec 27, 2010
4,550
372
Yes ORR was injured, but he also was the best player in Canada, perhaps the World at that time, I think most would agree, certainly from a NA perspective. He always wanted to play the Soviets and did get to to play them in the 1976 Canada Cup (MVP). 72 was also an exhibition series, not a tournament, that became much, much more.
Yakushev 72, as for Firsov, I am not familiar with him. Did he play in the 1976 Canada Cup?

Firsov was 31 years old in 1972, which is considered to be still in his physical prime, but by 1976, he was considered to be too old. The Soviets chose to go with a younger, unproven roster in 1976. Kharlamov (injured), Petrov, Mikhailov, Yakushev, Shadrin, the core of the national team, were all kept out of the tournament so that younger guys could get a try-out, if you will. They apparently didn't consider the new tournament to be worth sending their best players.
 

Yakushev72

Registered User
Dec 27, 2010
4,550
372
Was Firsov injured, or was his situation more political, as in the case of Hull?

From what I have read, he was a Tarasov loyalist who was subsequently removed from the national team, probably under the guise of a generic "injured" explanation.
 

Big Phil

Registered User
Nov 2, 2003
31,703
4,144
Those three games in 1987 were epic. All of them. I know the results of each game, when the goals are scored, and I STILL get shivers watching it. That overtime in Game 2...……….man oh man is that ever a perfect example of how Grant Fuhr could step up, and did.

Keenan built the team a little different, but it worked. Canada missed a lot of help from the back end. For a variety of reasons these were the missing Canadian defensemen: Robinson, Potvin, MacInnis, Stevens, Lowe, Wilson. Up front it isn't too shabby. I don't buy into the idea that Yzerman needed to be on the team, that was 1991. In 1987 the guy missing I thought was Denis Savard. Maybe they thought they had enough skill up front as it was and wanted more sandpaper, but I'd have loved to have seen Savard skate against that Soviet team.
 

patnyrnyg

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
10,838
869
By 87, wasn't Potvin starting to break down physically? He was about 34-35, which was considered old in 1987. But would be interesting to see people's idea for a Canada B team for that Tourney.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->