I dunno...Granlund could come to camp a new man,..He's always been a tough read...He,like Gaunce,Leipsic,Motte etc are all going to be in a fight for jobs in September.
Not sure on this one. I’d dangle him for whatever pick I could get. If that doesn’t work out then offer him a two way with good money in the AHL. Or a one way for 650KDo not qualify.
The Georgia Straight,June 5 2018He's not a tough read at all. He's a bad hockey player who got lucky for one season with an inflated SH%, and extremely favourable deployment. It's happened many times with many other scrub players in the NHL. I wouldn't bother qualifying Granlund. He's the type of useless player this team needs to move on from.
The Georgia Straight,June 5 2018
"But the Canucks went through a coaching change last offseason, and it became obvious very quickly that the new regime under head coach Travis Green was going to put an emphasis on having a strong and able checking line to match up with opponents’ top players.
Granlund was eyed as one of the candidates for that role and removed from a plum spot with the Sedins, which he occupied for much of the previous season.
That change in role is undoubtedly going to factor into Granlund’s next contract in a massive way. That’s because it’s hard to judge what Granlund did this year by looking at the bare stats.
Eight goals and four assists in 53 games. Minus-10. On the surface that’s a rough drop-off and would seem in line with the $900,000 salary he earned for the last two years.
But Granlund will almost certainly get a raise. Green leaned on him and Brandon Sutter quite a lot, sending them out against other teams’ top players. In fact, the 25-year-old started just under 62 percent of his shifts in the defensive zone.
He also only registered a minute and eight seconds of powerplay time per game—just barely above the likes of AHLer Reid Boucher—down from drawing almost two minutes of average time with the extra man last season.
That loss in powerplay time was more than made up for by the fact that Granlund averaged 2:25 of ice time while the Canucks were shorthanded, good for an increase of more than a minute on the previous season and second on the team among regular forwards. "
He just had a different role..and to be fair,I thought that he had a bit of an off year as well....Green likes him.Doesn't surprise me that Benning would give him a raise. Linden did compare Granlund to Patrice Bergeron. These idiots don't have a clue what they're doing so why would we expect them to do anything that makes sense?
Granlund was awful last year.
Havent heard that nickname for Hunter but I like itLol there is a checking line?
Either way if they boot him or sign him to a cheap deal he is a lot better than Baby Gary Busey. I hate Granlund but Shinkaruk was a lousy pick with Shea Theodore sitting there. Come on Eye Bags!!!!
He just had a different role..and to be fair,I thought that he had a bit of an off year as well....Green likes him.
When he's on,he can be an effective player that can play all 3 forward positions up and down the lineup...I think he will have a bounce back next season.
Your bias on this particular player is well documented..Even if he had a great season,you would never concede to it.Except that's not true at all. He wasn't even a good player in 2016-17. He just had an inflated SH% and favourable deployment. It's not like he was playing well on the ice. He constantly gets beat on board battles. He's weak defensively. He doesn't generate much offensively. He's not worth a roster spot.
Your bias on this particular player is well documented..Even if he had a great season,you would never concede to it.
Your bias on this particular player is well documented..Even if he had a great season,you would never concede to it.
Just because there's the 20 or 30 or so posters on HFVan that doubled down on the Shinkaruk trade does not mean that thats the general view of Markus Granlund.Well when he has a great season then this theory will be tested, no?
Kind of a useless accusation until then...
Just because there's the 20 or 30 or so posters on HFVan that doubled down on the Shinkaruk trade does not mean that thats the general view of Markus Granlund.
Vancouver Canucks: Markus Granlund deserves another chance
Predicting what will happen with the Vancouver Canucks’ restricted free agents: Markus Granlund
So opinions vs opinions?
Except that's not true at all. He wasn't even a good player in 2016-17. He just had an inflated SH% and favourable deployment. It's not like he was playing well on the ice. He constantly gets beat on board battles. He's weak defensively. He doesn't generate much offensively. He's not worth a roster spot.
There's no bias. I've formulated my opinion on this player based on his analytics. He's not a good hockey player.
Nobody cares about Shinkaruk. It's just a straw man for those out there who refuse to face the fact this is a thread about the player and not the transaction.Just because there's the 20 or 30 or so posters on HFVan that doubled down on the Shinkaruk trade does not mean that thats the general view of Markus Granlund.
Vancouver Canucks: Markus Granlund deserves another chance
Predicting what will happen with the Vancouver Canucks’ restricted free agents: Markus Granlund