I was wondering about this. So is it better for him to have his contract voided, figure out this bankruptcy and then sign a new contract?
Voiding the contract is the fun part. It is not as easy as that, Usually you need a reason and prove that you are unable to make money. And that is why I asked which state did he declare bankruptcy in or did he do it at the federal level? Different states have different ways of looking at bankruptcy and in some states, getting the contract voided to sign another way could be dicey, In the early 2000s several individuals and businesses declared bankruptcy, having in granted, only to have a million dollar contract waiting for them in 30 to 60 days(no pro athletes but rich normal people) and this caused many states to rejig their laws to prevent people from walking way from debt, only to walk into a very rich deal or contract a short time later.
I could be wrong, but voiding a contract just to get away from paying a debt could be illegal in a few states. My guess is the loans were given upon the basis of those contracts--so even if Kane files for bankruptsy, the Sharks could still be on line for the loans and losses.
And I will admit I need more information before saying I am right or wrong, but because he does have that contract it could be a little harder for him to file bankruptcy and sign a new contract in the NHL