Okay ... I'm going to post a re-post a few comments on the Clowe blocked shot in the previous "Armchair Coach's Thread" which aided and abetted the Canucks' Game tying Goal by Edler.
The original posts and names of the authors of said can be found in this link:
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=1509131&page=11
I'll also just point out that Clowe's "block" last night appeared unintentional. He didn't make a move to get in front of the shot. He was simply 8 feet away when Edler hit him with a wrister.
This is not true.
From this uploaded youtube video as "evidence", fast forward to 2:35:
Bieksa, not Edler hit him with a slap slot with Clowe ~30 feet away.
As another poster stated:
(on the inside of his foot, too, which is not how you block a shot)
Clowe, I can only assume "instinctually" reacted with the puck being shot in his direction and intentionally turned his foot sideways to block the shot and we saw the negative consequences that not only happen to befall himself but to his team as he struggled to get to the bench and the Canucks were therefore playing at a tactical advantage because of "his successfully unsuccessful blocked shot", and "it" played a huge role in why Edler was able to score rather nice GTG.
Now to a comment in this thread:
Here's what I think is missing when you guys talk about the sedins blocking shots: if you tell guys to get into shooting lanes without blocking shots, they won't.
My position on the Sedins' blocking shots was for Tort's to not make a big deal out of it. By him stating as another poster in that thread paraphrased to the media and by extension to the public:
Really Torts has said it best (and I paraphrase) "imagine the lift on the bench if the guys see a Sedin going out and blocking shots". It's a motivation, inspiration and extra effort thing.
In my opinion, that statement puts them in a no choice and in a sense, unfair predicament to go out of their way to block shots when/if they are on the PK while not exercising discretion. Because if they don't, they will tacitly give the impression that they are the equivalent of the "P" variation of the word "cats" which, IMO, would be wrong.
I ask this: Do the Sedins' have sufficient experience at this stage in their career and have developed the "skill" to block shots where they can at least try to mitigate the injury factor? I mean shot blocking isn't something you can really or want to practice (for obvious reasons) but is developed over years of actual in-game conditions.
In terms of the PK, the twins have been complaining for a long time about being taken out of the game because of lots of penalties making them sit. They are the ones pushing to play ok for this reason, they're good at it, and if they do play the PK it is unreasonable to expect they would be exempt from blocking shots like everyone else on the team.
It's not about "exempting" them from blocking shots but not pressing the issue and proclaiming how much of an "inspiration" it would be be if they blocked a bloody shot!
I mean that kind of "inspiration" would now seem to be almost as contrived as when we see a "staged" fight for no apparent reason, other than two tough guys trying to justify their role on the team and have their 2 minutes of fame and spotlight shine on them!!!
Then we see their teammates on the bench at the end of the fight banging the boards with their sticks, like it was like "inspiring" ... uh, okay.
Seriously, what would really be inspiring to see from the Sedins is more "Sedinary" and having them dominate a shift in the offensive zone:
That's gonna get their teammates and Canucks' fans to their feet.