Pre-Game Talk: The All Purpose Off Day Thread - It's Here!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,540
22,060
Pittsburgh
I find it will only be unreadable if one doesn't want to read dissenting or negative opinions. HF Pens, for the most part, does a good job of explaining their viewpoints to make it interesting to read, even in situations I don't agree with the poster.
the issue will be when they do far more good than bad but the bad is all that gets mentioned. With Letang, that's already what happens. JJ I'm obviously hoping it works out similarly in terms of his play :nod:
 

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,553
21,097
Simon has enough skill. The question will be whether he can provide the finish.

I doubt he has enough to make the 3rd line challenge opponents like HBK.

That's my ideal, and we're better suited depth-wise to do that now than we were during the Cup runs IMO.

What in the name of Thor's beer strainer have I just seen here?

My friend, you are in for a treat:



Juuso Riikola stays, Zach Aston-Reese goes as Penguins make final cuts

A few interesting Sully quotes in there too but I didn't want to quote too much.

@Tom Hanks

latest


you say this like it's only an issue for Sprong, but not for whoever else goes there. What makes Sprong more important than our other wings and prospects?

Well, he is by far our most talented and productive prospect...I mean, he handily won our best prospect vote for a reason.

You say worst position to start with like Sheahan and Cullen are awful players. The press box would be worse but even the worst position on the ice is still good.

Sprong with Malkin is that best for Malkin? Who plays on the 4th line?

Rust? Rust’s production has increased every year. Last season at a 45 point pace and he looked really good with Brassard.

Hornqvist? Horny is pretty much a consistent 50 point player (pace) throughout his career.

Kessel? Obviously not.

I think that's a lot more plausible than is generally thought here. I'd love to find out.

The obvious answer is moving Rust to LW. Yeah, the coach doesn't see him there (for who knows what reason), but Sprong's spot in the line-up is always going to be an issue until that's addressed.

Like, Bylsma saw Iginla as an LW too and it f***ed everything up - you can't very well come up with a better roster configuration when you put yourself in that box unnecessarily.
 

Tom Hanks

Spelling mistakes brought to you by my iPhone.
Nov 10, 2017
30,452
32,519

:laugh: Good news! I didn’t think ZAR would up end him as a RW. I really disliked L4 with ZAR there. Much happier with Sprong there. There isn’t anyone else on the roster unless Sully playd players on their off wing (Rust and Simon are really the only two that can).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Warm Cookies

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,393
25,264
I think that's a lot more plausible than is generally thought here. I'd love to find out.

The obvious answer is moving Rust to LW. Yeah, the coach doesn't see him there (for who knows what reason), but Sprong's spot in the line-up is always going to be an issue until that's addressed.

Like, Bylsma saw Iginla as an LW too and it ****ed everything up - you can't very well come up with a better roster configuration when you put yourself in that box unnecessarily.

He's not totally dead set against it. Rust played at least a 100 minutes with Kessel in 16-17 and 17-18 respectively (Geno's third most common line). Its not his preferred option, but its in the toolkit.

I think if he felt more confident in Sprong, he'd use it a lot more often. Alternately... if Simon gets any time on Crosby's line, that pretty much guarantees Rust to the LW too.
 

chethejet

Registered User
Feb 4, 2012
8,407
1,841
If Sprong is not on Crosby's line then a fourth line with Cullen, Sheahan who are both responsible defensive players can allow Sprong some offensive liberties. So with limited minutes and getting a defensive mindset with those two, may be the best.
 

Allie Kitsune

...and the Brawla Brawla Sewitt
Jan 7, 2006
9,957
2,337
Pennsylvania
Man, I don't mean to be a dick, because I know I'm the worst of the worst, but I just cannot bring myself to read any post where John f***ing Brennan is the avatar in front of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHOOTANDSCORE

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,553
21,097
He's not totally dead set against it. Rust played at least a 100 minutes with Kessel in 16-17 and 17-18 respectively (Geno's third most common line). Its not his preferred option, but its in the toolkit.

I think if he felt more confident in Sprong, he'd use it a lot more often. Alternately... if Simon gets any time on Crosby's line, that pretty much guarantees Rust to the LW too.

He needs to make it a go-to.

I really don't know what Sully expects from Sprong tbh. He was busting his ass at both ends and making some sharp plays out there - his talent's obvious. There's gonna be some mistakes along the way but the skill and the will is there, and I think a coach sometimes has to give that kind of upside an extended look to get comfortable and see what it can yield.

Every move is a calculated risk . Sometimes, if you can afford to, you risk a little more to possibly get a greater reward. The Pens wouldn't be forfeiting their season if Sprong got a healthy look in the top 9, but they might hit on the type of ELC scoring they'd have been foolish to pass on for a safer, competent prospect. Simon's solid, but there's a reason one guy's been our best prospect for years and the other's kinda been an afterthought.
 

WayneSid9987

Registered User
Nov 24, 2009
30,053
5,676
Good to know the brass were thinking the same as most of us on ZAR. You never really know until final decisions like today are made. ZAR needs to get that confidence back up and he can certainly do that in the A vs PIT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Hanks

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,540
22,060
Pittsburgh
He needs to make it a go-to.

I really don't know what Sully expects from Sprong tbh. He was busting his ass at both ends and making some sharp plays out there - his talent's obvious. There's gonna be some mistakes along the way but the skill and the will is there, and I think a coach sometimes has to give that kind of upside an extended look to get comfortable and see what it can yield.

Every move is a calculated risk . Sometimes, if you can afford to, you risk a little more to possibly get a greater reward. The Pens wouldn't be forfeiting their season if Sprong got a healthy look in the top 9, but they might hit on the type of ELC scoring they'd have been foolish to pass on for a safer, competent prospect. Simon's solid, but there's a reason one guy's been our best prospect for years and the other's kinda been an afterthought.
I really don't feel like it's an issue with Sprong that has him on the 4th line. I think Sully just really wants to keep Rust at RW for whatever reason. But with that, I also expect to see rotation between the RW's. Especially Rust and Sprong. I figure big D-zone draws will be Rust, and then Sprong will take the next 3rd line shift. But if they get on the ice mid-play it will be Rust on L3 and Sprong on L4. Similarly, I figure Sprong will get a 3rd line shift following most PK's. Plus the 2nd PP time. So even if he's on L4, I don't think he's going to be stapled to the D zone. And we all know Sully doesn't keep lines for long.

Maybe I'm just a naive optimist, but hopefully I'm right on that.
 

Dipsy Doodle

Rent A Barn
May 28, 2006
76,553
21,097
I really don't feel like it's an issue with Sprong that has him on the 4th line. I think Sully just really wants to keep Rust at RW for whatever reason. But with that, I also expect to see rotation between the RW's. Especially Rust and Sprong. I figure big D-zone draws will be Rust, and then Sprong will take the next 3rd line shift. But if they get on the ice mid-play it will be Rust on L3 and Sprong on L4. Similarly, I figure Sprong will get a 3rd line shift following most PK's. Plus the 2nd PP time. So even if he's on L4, I don't think he's going to be stapled to the D zone. And we all know Sully doesn't keep lines for long.

Maybe I'm just a naive optimist, but hopefully I'm right on that.

Maybe. If that were how things went I'd probably be as satisfied as I could be without Rust moving to LW. It does kind of beg the question though: If the plan is to regularly throw Sprong on the 3rd line after Rust's played PK/on the 4th for a d-zone draw...why didn't he play on the 3rd line even once in preseason to see if it would work?

Meticulous as Sully is, it's hard to imagine he'd come to a conclusion like that without at least checking what the line looked like first. Sprong only saw 1st and the 4th line duty.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,540
22,060
Pittsburgh
Maybe. If that were how things went I'd probably be as satisfied as I could be without Rust moving to LW. It does kind of beg the question though: If the plan is to regularly throw Sprong on the 3rd line after Rust's played PK/on the 4th for a d-zone draw...why didn't he play on the 3rd line even once in preseason to see if it would work?

Meticulous as Sully is, it's hard to imagine he'd come to a conclusion like that without at least checking what the line looked like first. Sprong only saw 1st and the 4th line duty.
I mean, we're going to see 100 line combos throughout the season. Rust will play on all 4 lines. Kessel will play with both Brass and Geno. Probably with Sheahan even. And I assume Sprong will move all over. I'm sure Brass will play some LW. A lot of things weren't done in preseason that I expect will be tried in the season.
 

EightyOne

My posts are jokes. And hockey is just a game.
Nov 23, 2016
12,697
12,034
I'm at the Acceptance phase re: Sprong

I don't even care anymore. I hope he scores points. But whatever.
 

ColePens

RIP Fugu Buffaloed & parabola
Mar 27, 2008
107,022
67,647
Pittsburgh
I'm at the Acceptance phase re: Sprong

I don't even care anymore. I hope he scores points. But whatever.

Totally agree. I've come to terms that the guy will move on from here and there is a very small percent that makes me believe he will ever be a regular here. I don't even invest time/effort into it because I just know it isn't going to work out.
 

BlindWillyMcHurt

ti kallisti
May 31, 2004
34,200
28,094
Totally agree. I've come to terms that the guy will move on from here and there is a very small percent that makes me believe he will ever be a regular here. I don't even invest time/effort into it because I just know it isn't going to work out.

I'm not trying to snap to judgement because the example I'm about to give had more egregious coaching/developmental errors associated with him but it reminds me a bit of the Despres situation. Where a ton was expected but every error was magnified and used to hold him down in the lineup. Oh well... hopefully when he's traded it'll be for someone who eventually helps them win another Stanley Cup, as Lovejoy undeniably did... regardless of how milquetoast and no-ceiling he was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Warm Cookies

EightyOne

My posts are jokes. And hockey is just a game.
Nov 23, 2016
12,697
12,034
Totally agree. I've come to terms that the guy will move on from here and there is a very small percent that makes me believe he will ever be a regular here. I don't even invest time/effort into it because I just know it isn't going to work out.

The last two years it was denial.
He's better than the 20ish games showed...I just know it. He'll prove it through stellar play!

The last week I had plenty of angry posts. Coaches suck! Booooo!

Then there's the bargaining that..hey there's a lot of RWs and you know Sprong can do good on that fourth line that isn't a fourth line.

Then the depression when the day to day injury as scratch happened.

And now..I accept this is the world now. It'll be okay.
 

Sidney the Kidney

One last time
Jun 29, 2009
55,670
46,538
so who do you put at 4RW; Horny, Phil, or Rust?

If Cullen and Sheahan are going to make up the C and LW on that line, then Rust. It can be used as a proper defensive line since all three guys are capable defensively, but also all three aren't devoid of offensive talent.

Sprong just seems like a fish out of water on a line that includes two guys who will likely see 70% of their shifts in the defensive zone. That's literally the last line I'd think he'd fit on.
 

Ogrezilla

Nerf Herder
Jul 5, 2009
75,540
22,060
Pittsburgh
If Cullen and Sheahan are going to make up the C and LW on that line, then Rust. It can be used as a proper defensive line since all three guys are capable defensively, but also all three aren't devoid of offensive talent.

Sprong just seems like a fish out of water on a line that includes two guys who will likely see 70% of their shifts in the defensive zone. That's literally the last line I'd think he'd fit on.
yeah, the thing is Rust is also better than him on the scoring line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->