The all-purpose: Alexander Wennberg thread

Wennberg points estimate for 2019-20


  • Total voters
    54
Status
Not open for further replies.

CBJx614

Registered User
May 25, 2012
14,876
6,483
C-137
I agree wholeheartedly. Especially if its an empty netter or you're up or down by 5 with a minute to go.
Let's take Folignos goal the other night where he was all alone back door for an easy tap in.

Foligno and that line did a lot of work, but him scoring was the easiest part of that whole sequence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: major major

EspenK

Registered User
Sep 25, 2011
15,615
4,183
Let's take Folignos goal the other night where he was all alone back door for an easy tap in.

Foligno and that line did a lot of work, but him scoring was the easiest part of that whole sequence.

Easy yes, important more so. How many times have we seen wide open nets missed after a great pass or whatever set it up? To say the goal itself is not the most important part of a play seems like esoteric bs to me.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
Easy yes, important more so. How many times have we seen wide open nets missed after a great pass or whatever set it up? To say the goal itself is not the most important part of a play seems like esoteric bs to me.

"The goal itself" was mostly created by Dubois' pass and the puckhound play of Duclair. Foligno's tap-in there was something anyone could do - and that is the question when it comes to the value of a player's contribution: how replaceable is it? You could put a high schooler in that spot and you still get a goal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WubbaLubbaDubDub

EspenK

Registered User
Sep 25, 2011
15,615
4,183
"The goal itself" was mostly created by Dubois' pass and the puckhound play of Duclair. Foligno's tap-in there was something anyone could do - and that is the question when it comes to the value of a player's contribution: how replaceable is it? You could put a high schooler in that spot and you still get a goal.

A high schooler yes; but a Jacket? Maybe 50/50.
 

thebus88

19/20 Columbus Blue Jackets: "It Is What It Is"
Sep 27, 2017
5,044
2,679
Michigan
This would all be relevant if WENNBERG was the 1 causing these goals to happen without scoring the goal himself. How many assists does Wennberg get that are because of the "work" of other players? How many goals does he actually create? Or are assists always important while goals aren't?

Its why I've said many times in the past, many of his "primary" assists ARE secondary.

The most redundant forward/player on the team. Its crazy how the tiniest things he does on the ice now are magnified to attempt to show his worth.
 

thebus88

19/20 Columbus Blue Jackets: "It Is What It Is"
Sep 27, 2017
5,044
2,679
Michigan
Those of you who don't believe the "rumors" about Wenny….

What does Bruce get out of making a "not much interest league wide for Wennberg" rumor public? You think the dozen Wennberg fans here and the dozen more preteen girls back in Columbus are enough hits for him to just come out with a random (made up) rumor like that??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclones Rock

Cyclones Rock

Registered User
Jun 12, 2008
10,558
6,476
Wenny with the 3rd most TOI among forwards mustered a SOG.

One goal in his last 41 regular season games-one half of a season. He's officially Ville Leino level of suckage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Bread Man

CBJx614

Registered User
May 25, 2012
14,876
6,483
C-137
Easy yes, important more so. How many times have we seen wide open nets missed after a great pass or whatever set it up? To say the goal itself is not the most important part of a play seems like esoteric bs to me.
Then we'll just have to disagree. Sometimes being able to have the vision to see 2-3 passes/plays ahead of time and being able to spring someone open can be harder than being the one whose open to pull the trigger.

Yes it takes skill to shoot the puck and it's far from easy, but being able to make the correct reads at the speed the game is played at can be just as difficult.
 

Crede777

Deputized
Dec 16, 2009
14,636
4,159
Wenny with the 3rd most TOI among forwards mustered a SOG.

One goal in his last 41 regular season games-one half of a season. He's officially Ville Leino level of suckage.
Ville Leino doesn't get trusted with that kind of ice time. Wennberg has to be doing something right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnnyJacket13

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
53,768
31,174
40N 83W (approx)
Those of you who don't believe the "rumors" about Wenny….

What does Bruce get out of making a "not much interest league wide for Wennberg" rumor public? You think the dozen Wennberg fans here and the dozen more preteen girls back in Columbus are enough hits for him to just come out with a random (made up) rumor like that??
You're assuming competence on the part of Garrioch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnnyJacket13

EDM

Registered User
Mar 8, 2008
6,228
2,010
Why does it sound surprising that a player getting paid almost $5 million per year and who has scored only one goal in half a season would be drawing minimal interest around the league as a trade candidate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: thebus88

Monk

Registered User
Feb 5, 2008
7,504
5,398
Why does it sound surprising that a player getting paid almost $5 million per year and who has scored only one goal in half a season would be drawing minimal interest around the league as a trade candidate?

Where are you seeing surprise?
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
53,768
31,174
40N 83W (approx)
I will happily completely reconsider my stance on Wennberg the instant any of the Wennberg Hate Crowd manages to make a tangible fact-based argument against his having any value that does NOT involve: 1) ignoring points in favor of goals scored, OR 2) "because William Karlsson".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anisimovs AK

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
I will happily completely reconsider my stance on Wennberg the instant any of the Wennberg Hate Crowd manages to make a tangible fact-based argument against his having any value that does NOT involve: 1) ignoring points in favor of goals scored, OR 2) "because William Karlsson".

It's endlessly funny that "because William Karlsson" is used as an argument for dumping Wennberg, and not as an argument for keeping him.

You'd think that Karlsson being the last Jacket to play 43 games with one goal would tell you something. But no, the very posters excoriating the FO for not seeing Karlsson's underlying brilliance are also clamoring for the FO to dump Wennberg, on the very grounds that Wennberg has only one goal in 43 games, as if it should automatically follow from the goal drought that the player should be dumped. If there was any thought involved, as opposed to ill-tempered crankery, it wouldn't be the same group of people espousing both views.
 

Cyclones Rock

Registered User
Jun 12, 2008
10,558
6,476
It's endlessly funny that "because William Karlsson" is used as an argument for dumping Wennberg, and not as an argument for keeping him.

You'd think that Karlsson being the last Jacket to play 43 games with one goal would tell you something. But no, the very posters excoriating the FO for not seeing Karlsson's underlying brilliance are also clamoring for the FO to dump Wennberg, on the very grounds that Wennberg has only one goal in 43 games, as if it should automatically follow from the goal drought that the player should be dumped. If there was any thought involved, as opposed to ill-tempered crankery, it wouldn't be the same group of people espousing both views.

Karlsson never saw the minutes/usage Wennberg gets. Apples and Orangutans. Nice Try. Not.

Karlsson's at 14 goals and counting after a slow start. 14th among 95 centers who have played 35 games or more. Shooting 17.5%. 13th among centers. Yeah. Columbus management BLEW IT with him. Completely.

Wenny last among 95 centers with 35 games with 1 goal. 92/95 with his stellar 2.9% shooting percentage.

The CBJ are where they are in the standings in spite of Wennberg, not because of him. He is an anchor.

Ill-tempered crankery. From whom did you lift that one:laugh:
 
Last edited:

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
Karlsson never saw the minutes/usage Wennberg gets. Apples and Orangutans. Nice Try. Not.

Karlsson's at 14 goals and counting after a slow start. 14th among 95 centers who have played 35 games or more. Shooting 17.5%. 13th among centers. Yeah. Columbus management BLEW IT with him. Completely.

Wenny last among 95 centers with 35 games with 1 goal. 92/95 with his stellar 2.9% shooting percentage.

Karlsson played a little over 14 minutes per, in two consecutive seasons. Wennberg is currently averaging a little over 15.

Where do you think Karlsson was in those goal rankings when he was a Jacket?
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
53,768
31,174
40N 83W (approx)
Check out the comparable contracts to Wennberg from a real source, not some cherry-picking, Wennberg excuse-making, CBJ management cheerleader:

Alexander Wennberg Comparables Results - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps

It's a terrible contract. Trade him or buy him out at 1/3rd.
Hon? Guys like Bo Horvat and Vincent Trocheck are considered to be on deals that are amazingly good for their teams. This might come as a surprise, but there are contract states in between "screamingly good deal for the team" and "buyout candidate".

Seriously. You're trying to compare him to the sorts of guys we'd end up trading folks like Werenski for. That's insanity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad