It's endlessly funny that "because William Karlsson" is used as an argument for dumping Wennberg, and not as an argument for keeping him.
You'd think that Karlsson being the last Jacket to play 43 games with one goal would tell you something. But no, the very posters excoriating the FO for not seeing Karlsson's underlying brilliance are also clamoring for the FO to dump Wennberg, on the very grounds that Wennberg has only one goal in 43 games, as if it should automatically follow from the goal drought that the player should be dumped. If there was any thought involved, as opposed to ill-tempered crankery, it wouldn't be the same group of people espousing both views.