It was as bad as this in about 2001, probably worse really. This particular list left off Bieksa who (along with the soon to be pissed away UMberger) was actually our best prospect at the time. It's still ugly if you add Bieksa:
2001-02 Canucks Preview of Ranked Prospects - Hockey's Future (hockeysfuture.com)
in no way do we have one of our worst prospect pools. overall depth? maybe.
first this write-up was done after the draft(why umberger was there) so they couldnt include prospects that had graduated. so youd be either looking to include the upcoming draft picks or go back to the start of the season and include hoglander etc.
even if we cut hoglander, and juolevi it still leaves us with rathbone, dipeitro who are still considered prospects even though they were with the team for a longer time.
theres no way we are worse.
looking at that link and what we have now.
bieksa - woo (top 4 rd)
umberger - 1st 2021 (umberger was just drafted when that list was created so ill put it as a comparable)
auld- dipietro (back-up, with starter hype)
chubarov - costmar (3rd/4th c)
fedorov - kunz (interesting but flaws)
vyrdaney - breeeesbois (dman who wont contribute to canucks)
reid- lind (interesting but prob fizzle out)
bell - karlsson(never gonna see either)
holden - jasek (2 players done with the canucks that capped out in ahl)
smith - zlodeyev (two players who had rumblings after draft, but project as 3rd liners if that)
komarniski - rafferty (2 high scoring d who will be gone)
still leaves us rathbone, podz, gadj, focht, this years draft class besides the 1st who dont match up with prospects we had back then.
yes i realize holden and smith were higher draft picks but they were always predicted as 3rd liners, so thats why i matched them with similar