we can acknowledge that both of the following are true, without needing to pick sides
a) Horny was present for the past 2 playoff failures, and had some concerns that made trading him a palatable idea
b) early returns on the trade are abysmal and the team as a whole is playing worse without him
Pretty much where I'm at.
I don't regret dealing Hornqvist. He had to be dealt a day early as opposed to a day late, and he was a 3rd liner making ~$5.5 million to be a power play specialist on a team with a below average power play, who hasn't done a damn thing in the playoffs for years despite being labeled a "playoff warrior", yadda yadda. Also, due to his injury issues recently, contract, and age, we were never getting a great return for him. Still, a trade needed to happen.
But, the issue is that JR was the GM who traded him. A guy so brain-poisoned by his success with reclamation projects that he went out and landed a guy who is a huge question mark, makes ~$5 million, and is signed until the end of time--so if/when he ends up being a bad player, we're going to have to pay Seattle a big premium to take him off of our hands.