DickSmehlik
Registered User
Danggggggggggggggggg Crosby's grace period is getting ridiculous.
With McDavid and Matthews the most outstanding player between them was the guy who made the North Division their competition.
Crosby should win this.
Except he shouldn’t. He gets reputation votes every year because he is Crosby.
McDavid just put up a historic year. No player in their right mind would think Crosby was better this year. Defensively? Sure. But the gap in offense is a canyon.
thats what the conn smyth is for....Interesting that they were all massive disappointments in the playoffs this year. Almost makes you wonder if they should factor that into decision for the finalists/winner. After all, what good is a great regular season if you are totally shut down in the playoffs?
I didn't realize Crosby's production was that close to Kane's, in that case I can get him being ranked ahead.
Draisaitl didn't play the entire season with McDavid, he spend a lot of time in between Kahun/Yamamoto/Nuge, and he finished on pace for ~30 extra points over the whole season. Combined with his much-improved defensive play, I would have him pretty comfortably ranked ahead of Crosby.
being normal bad wasn't enough. We got numb to it. The hockey gods thought giving us a generational talent and still sucking would be more fun. Then that got old so we now have great seasons and then get upset early each year. Im waiting for the inevitable reverse sweep in the cup finals to push us oiler fans over the edge.Given that it's highly likely than an Oiler wins this award for the fourth time in five years, if we don't make some real strides forward in being a successful playoff team (herein meaning winning 2 rounds next year)... some heads have gotta roll, man.
Except he shouldn’t. He gets reputation votes every year because he is Crosby.
I remember a notorious poster here once said that a 10 point difference > than superior Selke winning defensive play.
Crosby pro-rated 82 games: 92 pts
Draisaitl pro-rated 82 games: 123 pts
Difference: 31 pts
Somehow though, now I'm sure he's swung his opinion 180 degrees and claims that superior defensive play (not close to Selke level) > a 31 pt gap. Beyond comical actually.
Why are you so bothered that Crosby's going to finish a distant 3rd in Lindsay voting? McDavid's running away with this thing, so a player getting a handful more votes to finish 3rd than the guys who finish 4th, 5th and 6th seems like you're getting worked up over literally nothing.
Should Draisaitl have come above Crosby? Yeah, I'd say so, although it's tough to evaluate Draisaitl in a vacuum just because he plays with McDavid. Does it matter? Literally neither of those guys are going to be even in the same stratosphere in voting as McDavid.
Point #1 confuses me a bit. You are acknowledging that Crosby's peers know more about who's playing good hockey (admitting they are more knowledgeable, and wouldn't be biased) - but then you say that Marchand's reputation maybe influenced how the players voted (which makes them biased - and that they didn't actually vote on who was the best).1. Crosby's peers know more about who's playing good hockey than a random fan stat watching. To suggest the players are wrong and you're right because you can look on NHL.com for stat lines is nothing short of deluded arrogance.
2. Crosby's peers realize that the Penguins had massive injury issues this season, which made Crosby's performance more impressive than it would seem on paper. I think this is more of an argument for the Hart than the Lindsay, but it's an absolutely true argument.
3. Crosby's peers may also think higher of Crosby's defensive skills than you do. Maybe they don't agree with you that guys like Marchand and Stone are better defensively.
Would I have put Draisaitl above Crosby? Yeah, I would have. Marchand? Maybe, but I totally get why his reputation influenced the way the players voted on it. Anyone else? It's splitting hairs. And even beyond that, literally who gives a crap? It's 3rd place and miles away from 1st place.
Points | Goals | Points above | Goals above | Points | Goals | Points above | Goals above | |||
Crosby | 62 | 24 | Marchand | 69 | 29 | |||||
#1 | #1 | |||||||||
#2 | 57 | 23 | 9% | 4% | #2 | 48 | 23 | 44% | 26% | |
#3 | 45 | 22 | 38% | 9% | #3 | 48 | 20 | 44% | 45% | |
#4 | 42 | 14 | 48% | 71% | #4 | 44 | 15 | 57% | 93% | |
#5 | 32 | 11 | 94% | 118% | #5 | 32 | 13 | 116% | 123% | |
Points | Goals | Points above | Goals above | Points | Goals | Points above | Goals above | |||
Stone | 61 | 21 | Draisaitl | 84 | 31 | |||||
#1 | 24 | -13% | #1 | 105 | 33 | -20% | -6% | |||
#2 | 51 | 21 | 20% | 0% | #2 | 84 | 31 | 0% | 0% | |
#3 | 44 | 18 | 39% | 17% | #3 | 48 | 16 | 75% | 94% | |
#4 | 42 | 18 | 45% | 17% | #4 | 36 | 16 | 133% | 94% | |
#5 | 39 | 14 | 56% | 50% | #5 | 35 | 15 | 140% | 107% | |
Points | Goals | Points above | Goals above | |||||||
Barkov | 58 | 26 | ||||||||
#1 | 61 | 26 | -5% | 0% | ||||||
#2 | 58 | 20 | 0% | 30% | ||||||
#3 | 36 | 18 | 61% | 44% | ||||||
#4 | 36 | 18 | 61% | 44% | ||||||
#5 | 32 | 17 | 81% | 53% |
% of team goals that player had point on: | |
Crosby | 32% |
Marchand | 42% |
Stone | 32% |
Draisaitl | 46% |
Barkov | 31% |
Point #1 confuses me a bit. You are acknowledging that Crosby's peers know more about who's playing good hockey (admitting they are more knowledgeable, and wouldn't be biased) - but then you say that Marchand's reputation maybe influenced how the players voted (which makes them biased - and that they didn't actually vote on who was the best).
Point #2: Every team had injuries, Crosby wasn't really any better offensively compared to his own team than any of the guys who I believe were better players this year (other than Mackinnon since the Avs are stacked - but most pens fans wouldn't acknowledge that argument when Crosby got to play PP and some ES time with Malkin in their careers - but that's aside from my point)
Drai and Marchand actually come out way ahead compared to Crosby, and Stone/Barkov are pretty close (even despite Barkov missing like 6 games too).[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Points Goals Points above Goals above Points Goals Points above Goals above Crosby 62 24 Marchand 69 29 #1 #1 #2 57 23 9% 4% #2 48 23 44% 26% #3 45 22 38% 9% #3 48 20 44% 45% #4 42 14 48% 71% #4 44 15 57% 93% #5 32 11 94% 118% #5 32 13 116% 123% Points Goals Points above Goals above Points Goals Points above Goals above Stone 61 21 Draisaitl 84 31 #1 24 -13% #1 105 33 -20% -6% #2 51 21 20% 0% #2 84 31 0% 0% #3 44 18 39% 17% #3 48 16 75% 94% #4 42 18 45% 17% #4 36 16 133% 94% #5 39 14 56% 50% #5 35 15 140% 107% Points Goals Points above Goals above Barkov 58 26 #1 61 26 -5% 0% #2 58 20 0% 30% #3 36 18 61% 44% #4 36 18 61% 44% #5 32 17 81% 53%
When you look at offence compared to total team, Crosby is nothing special in this comparison either.
At the end of the day, even if 3-7 was close, I think it's fair to say he's much closer to 7th than he is to 3. I would say for sure that Draisaitl and Marchand are actually on a separate tier than the rest of those guys (Mackinnon too, but his regular season wasn't as dominant)[TBODY] [/TBODY]
% of team goals that player had point on: Crosby 32% Marchand 42% Stone 32% Draisaitl 46% Barkov 31%
Just wait until the hart finalists come. 33 year old crosby still top 3 player in the world.....Oof this had made a lot of people angry.
Never did I once say that's how I believe the award should have been voted on. I was simply proving someone else's argument to be incorrect.I am guessing all of the players created Excel spreadsheets just like this when they were doing their voting. Maybe they had a bad sumif formula?
Gretzky led the nhl in points in 1994Gretzky likely wasent Even a top 5 player in 94
And didn't get a single hart vote. Not comparableGretzky led the nhl in points in 1994
Non play off teamAnd didn't get a single hart vote. Not comparable