who_me?
Registered User
- Oct 7, 2003
- 3,408
- 1,241
He looks like Kelly Buchberger's love child.He looked like complete ass tonight against the Rangers.
He looks like Kelly Buchberger's love child.He looked like complete ass tonight against the Rangers.
That year he won that Hart trophy for his Herculean effort in dragging the Devils into the playoffs, all I could think was “you lazy smarmy bastard”. I also didn’t know that being horribly snake bit, which is Hall’s only problem right now, is a personality disorder.Better than playing with Jack Eichel?
Hall is a renowned lazy player who coasts on his skill and is generally been talked about as being uncoachable and a terrible influence for nearly a decade now. Worse he has been known to drag others into his sphere of smarmy laziness and was seen as a negative presence almost everywhere he played.
Would it though? I'd assume it would only be teams with a good shot at the cup, so something like Tampa, Boston, Colorado, Toronto, Washington, and Vegas.
Tampa, Toronto, Washington, and Vegas will have no room to add him (at least i'm pretty sure). That would leave Colorado potentially (it would be quite tight though) and Boston.
A couple points:
1) Hall and Eichel mostly haven't been linemates at even-strength. They started the year together but were separated early on and it has been Olofsson-Eichel-Reinhart and Hall-Staal-Cozens lately, with a different winger here or there.
2) Being an Oilers fan that watched Hall closely from 2010-2016, I completely dispute the notion of Hall being lazy. He was the team's best player by a pretty wide margin until McDavid was drafted, and on some pretty terrible teams he managed to Corsi at just shy of 50%, netting +3 in 5 on 5 goals (261GF-258GA), while producing at a rate of 70 points per 82 games with 2 top 10 scoring finishes in the entire league over those 6 years. To my eye, he was the one making everything happen on whatever line he played on for those years. It would be fair to call him a bit soft/lazy defensively, but his forechecking and effort put into puck retrieval in the offensive zone are his bread-and-butter as a player. He came up with a lot of high-effort plays to make things happen for the team offensively, and tilted the ice positively on a lot of nights. The results as far as win-loss don't match that because he was only out there for 18-20 out of the 60 minutes in the game. I won't speak to coachability, and there is some smoke around his locker-room presence that I can't dispute though. A lot of this reputational stuff though (I think) is some immaturity (not uncommon for young, rich and famous people) and not always handling his emotions/frustrations well in his early 20s, playing on such a bad team.
To me, it feels like you're parroting some common HF rhetoric on this player without having seen them play.
Not really HF rhetoric. I am parroting what his coaches and teammates and a lot of connected news sources said about him after he left each team he was on.
thats not quite accurate, the acquiring team would also need to have been sitting on at LEAST $4 mil of cap space all season to fit in half of a season of Hall at 50%.IF i understand the rules right,,IF Buff retains half AND over half the season is played
Halls cap hit would be in the 2m range
Ryan (cap) + Bennett + Flames 1st (lottery protected) for Hall + 30% retention (cap)
Flames add a ‘missing piece’ up front and see if they can’t reach their potential.
Offer contingent on the Flames firing Ward and hiring an actual coach.
HA! I wish the Flames would make a trade like this for Hall, and then sign him to a long and pricey contract.
Don't you think the Oilers could benefit from one year of Hall at 50%?
No ... I wish Hall all the best, but his time as an Oiler is over. I would be happy to watch Calgary's team become even more dysfunctional with the addition of the ego that is Hall.
I could see us having him for a playoff push. Might be exciting to see.
Long term? I agree with you 100%.
I don't see where he would play ... he and McDavid were not good together. They both need to be the guy with the puck. Drai's line ... maybe? Beyond that, Hall - even at 50% - would be an expensive 3rd liner.
I want to see player movement on the Oil (trades), but I would rather see actual hockey trades at this point involving players signed beyond this season. I don't want to see the Oilers give up the assets to sign Hall just for a push. And as I suggested, Hall has no place on the Oilers going forward.
We were told we were going to compete for a playoff spot...I was told by Sabres fans not too long ago that Hall was going to sign long term, that there was no chance Buffalo would trade him
Hmmm
I did watch him play. Terrific skillet.I think you hit the nail on the head about Taylor Hall as a player. When he played for the Oilers he was on some pretty bad teams and was often referred to as the straw that stirs the drink when on the ice. He was a difference maker.
His issues with being coached? That is also very fair. remember the water bottle incident on the bench?
Whether parroting HF rhetoric or parroting what you've read online you're not in a position to state you know what is going on with this player. You have to actually watch him play the game. Boxed scores only tell you part of the story.
Arizona was so excited when they got him. Calling it a once in a lifetime opportunity to get a player of his caliber.At this point, I honestly think there is an issue with Hall. Other than his peak with the Hart trophy, everything else has been underwhelming with him. Failure doesn't just follow him, it rides on his back.
I'd avoid him if I were a GM.
We were told we were going to compete for a playoff spot...
Arizona was so excited when they got him. Calling it a once in a lifetime opportunity to get a player of his caliber.
Then they decided to mutually part ways and let him walk to free agency despite having the cap room to resign him if they wanted
I don't see where he would play ... he and McDavid were not good together. They both need to be the guy with the puck. Drai's line ... maybe? Beyond that, Hall - even at 50% - would be an expensive 3rd liner.
I want to see player movement on the Oil (trades), but I would rather see actual hockey trades at this point involving players signed beyond this season. I don't want to see the Oilers give up the assets to sign Hall just for a push. And as I suggested, Hall has no place on the Oilers going forward.
If we get Hall back, I'd prefer him flanking the 3rd line centered by Nuge.
Chances are, when he signed with Buffalo, he likely told them where he wanted to be traded (which included either back to Edmonton or a cup contender).
Hall is a terrible long-term gamble for any team, and I certainly don't want us on the receiving end of any contract over $5m AAV or 4 years.
With his style of play and injury history, his career trajectory is likely on a downward spiral.