Hockey DB Devils main pageWhat site are you looking at? Hockey reference has the 09 team at 238 goals and this years team at 243.
Hall only had 2 20+ goal scorers with Palms at 24 and Nico at 20. Parise had 4 on his team with Elias at 37, Langs at 29 and Gionta and Zajac at 20.
The narrative isn't false to say that Hall carried this team on his back, because he did and the stats back it up. Parise had way more help than Hall did.
That 09 team was way better than this one, finished with 106 points and won the division and should have never lost in the first round until they **** the bed in game 7 in the worst moment in the history of the Prudential Center and one of the worst in the teams history.
This is why I disagree when people say the Devils need more "depth scoring". They really need production from the 2nd line, which I don't consider a "depth" line. They're EXPECTED to score.Hockey DB Devils main page
New Jersey Devils hockey team statistics and history at hockeydb.com
We also had a lot of depth scoring this year and injured players that performed well when in the lineup but only played partial seasons like Palmieri on 62 games, like Zajac only 63 games, like Johansson 29 games and 14 points, like Gibbons 59 games...we got scoring from everyone this season.
10 players had 10 or more goals and Severson had 9.
The 2009 team had 8 10 or more goal scores and then it drops to 7... because fewer players in 2009 were doing a bulk of the scoring.
The 2009 team was better mostly because of experience from battle tested winners but not overall skill.
Hockey DB Devils main page
New Jersey Devils hockey team statistics and history at hockeydb.com
We also had a lot of depth scoring this year and injured players that performed well when in the lineup but only played partial seasons like Palmieri on 62 games, like Zajac only 63 games, like Johansson 29 games and 14 points, like Gibbons 59 games...we got scoring from everyone this season.
10 players had 10 or more goals and Severson had 9.
The 2009 team had 8 10 or more goal scores and then it drops to 7... because fewer players in 2009 were doing a bulk of the scoring.
The 2009 team was better mostly because of experience from battle tested winners but not overall skill.
In 2009 Coaching was better, defensive structure was better, goaltending was better, overall system was better...the team still saw themselves as winners.Hockey DB has it listed wrong, it's 243 on here the NHL website too.
Hall played 6 less games than Parise too or he would have easily put up a bunch more points.
We are just going to have to agree to disagree on this one cause I think the 09 team was way better than this one. We didn't even get into goaltending which was way better that year even with Marty getting hurt.
I was just happy to be in the playoffs this year cause none of us expected to go far. That 09 team could have and should have at least gotten to the second round if not another round after that. That ending still pisses me off.
phil kessel, come on downnnnnnnnGive this man a RW and a top pairing defenseman this summer
phil kessel, come on downnnnnnnn
phil kessel, come on downnnnnnnn
In 2009 Coaching was better, defensive structure was better, goaltending was better, overall system was better...the team still saw themselves as winners.
But I would argue that it's easier to put up 90 points playing in a Hynes system than a Sutter system. From a pure scoring perspective the 2018 team was much more conducive to putting up numbers in my opinion.
we lost that carolina series because of terrible coaching. no excuse for madden to lead the devils in ice time in a game 7, with pandolfo and shanahan having just as much as parise and more than langenbrunner and zajac, and elias less than all of them , decided to start line matching at the worst time and i have no doubt that cost us the series. have hated sutter since then
it looks more like an onion than a torchis it just me or is that trophy ugly?