Body Checker
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2005
- 3,416
- 1,077
Has to stay on left side for now as wideman only thrives with big minutes. Once wideman goes to 3rd pairing minutes his game suffers. Next year Brodie can go back to the right side
Yet another foolish agenda.
Before this year Brodie played for 1 count it 1 NHL head coach.
Yet another foolish agenda.
Before this year Brodie played for 1 count it 1 NHL head coach. Now as we all know it takes Dmen longer to develop and when they are younger it takes them longer to adjust to new systems. (Look no further than Dougie last season.)
Couple that with some personal life issues and it is not difficult to see why Brodie has lagged a little behind the others.
That said Brodie is one of the smoothest skating D-men in the league. He is an elite playmaker and great hockey IQ.
That said some are suggesting we trade a younger defenseman that many analysts view as a potential future Norris trophy candidate instead of 2 mediocre older defensemen. Factor in the fact his contract is one of the few bargains in the NHL and I have to ask are some of you sniffing glue?
The largest factors facing the Flames moving forward are:
1.) Can Wideman and Engelland be moved so some of the younger prospects can get some NHL time.
2.) Which of the bottom 6 forwards do you move to bring up prospects with higher potentials. (Bouma, Stajan, Freddie Hamilton, Backlund, Ferland)
3.) Can Calgary buy a development machine to make the prospects in the AHL develop faster. Might be worth having a look on E-Bay.
Yet another foolish agenda.
Just wondering, as someone who doesn't pay much attention to D-pairings during the game, did we ever try Brodie-Russell? If we did, did it look passable?
I believe we did in 13-14 when Gio was injured.
Just wondering, as someone who doesn't pay much attention to D-pairings during the game, did we ever try Brodie-Russell? If we did, did it look passable?
if we did it was short lived. It was Brodie - Engellanda nd Russell - Wideman for the most part.
oh, then in that case, i do not recallThe pairings you're mentioning are from 14-15 when gio went down for the playoff run, I was referring to the season before, when we didn't have Engellend.
Does this include his several massive giveaways in the slot to opposing players? Not taking away that Gio has been a solid D presence, but let's not act like he's been phenomenal. Brodie has had small lapses, but he's been better in all zones than Gio.He's obviously had a fantastic start offensively but that's definitely blinding people from how he's actually played. He's played good, but he without a doubt has another gear in him.
He's been pretty inconsistent and his defensive play (which is usually elite) has been non-existent for some stretches early this season. I am fully confident he'll get better as the season goes along but Giordano has remained our best D-man early on in the season. His defensive play continues to be phenomenal.
Some Flames fans are just looking at his offensive numbers and going "Wow! He's been unbelievable! Clearly our best D-man so far!" That's simply not the case.
Gonna have to disagree with you on that. Brodie's my favourite Flames dman, but he has not played as well as he historically did defensively. He's gotten lost a couple of times and been beaten a few as well. There was a period of a couple of years where he was almost impossible to get around and was always in good position, which hasn't been the case in the last season and a bit.Does this include his several massive giveaways in the slot to opposing players? Not taking away that Gio has been a solid D presence, but let's not act like he's been phenomenal. Brodie has had small lapses, but he's been better in all zones than Gio.